瀏覽人次:
12419
相關演講
|
演講主題
|
作者來說書｜賀照田《革命-後革命：當代中國歷史、思想、文化省思》線上座談回顧 |
|
演講日期
|
2020年6月12日 |
|
演講講者
|
賀照田 |
|
演講摘要
|
賀照田老師，主要研究範圍在中國十八世紀中葉以降政治史、思想史和中國現當代文學。 在他的《革命—後革命：當代中國歷史、思想、文化省思》一書中，提供認識中國崛起的不同視角，並重新認識當代中國「革命—後革命」的歷史進程。 因為疫情的關係，本場新書講座採線上會議的方式進行。由交大劉紀蕙老師主持，並邀請王智明老師、林淑芬老師與作者賀照田老師對談。本場講座達100多位讀者參與，是在疫情期間，難能可貴橫跨兩岸的成功線上座談。 今次釋出的片段為講座過程的節錄，供各位讀者回顧四位老師的精彩對談。 而賀照田老師更完整的論述與思想，也敬請參考他的新書：《革命—後革命：當代中國歷史、思想、文化省思》 博客來：https://reurl.cc/oLAkyg 三民：https://reurl.cc/O1nZ5r 誠品：https://reurl.cc/oLAkYV 學生書局：https://reurl.cc/5lzjbR 主辦單位：文化研究國際中心 International Center for Cultural Studies - UST 中央研究院 Academia Sinica 交通大學社會與文化研究所 SRCS 台灣社會研究學會 Association for Taiwan Social Studies |
|
演講主題
|
青春的祝福 《蝸牛在荊棘上——路翎及其作品研究》新書座談會 |
|
演講日期
|
2020年5月26日 |
|
演講講者
|
宋玉雯、顧玉玲 |
|
演講摘要
|
青春的祝福 《蝸牛在荊棘上——路翎及其作品研究》新書座談會 時間：2020年5月26日(二) 8:00-10:00 地點：交通大學綜合一館A401教室 路翎（1923-1994）是四十年代中國現代文學的耀眼晨星，偏好描寫流浪漢－工人和底層人物的複雜心靈，刻劃知識青年在歷史變局中的追尋和惶惑。1955年因「胡風反革命集團」案繫獄，身心受挫，被迫輟筆逾四分之一世紀，晚年的文學炭火，重燃冷寂中難得的熱與光。誠摯邀請您同來閱讀路翎的創作故事，探索路翎「落後書寫」的洞見和契機。 主持人：彭明偉 （交通大學社會與文化研究所副教授） 與談：宋玉雯（國立中央大學中國文學系助理教授）、顧玉玲（台北藝術大學出版中心主任） 主辦單位：國立交通大學文化研究國際中心、亞際文化研究國際碩士學位學程（台灣聯合大學系統）、交通大學社會與文化研究所、交通大學出版社、交通大學通識中心 |
|
演講主題
|
液態正義：以類造人的意識形態與治理術 |
|
演講日期
|
2020年5月5日 |
|
演講講者
|
吳哲良 |
|
演講摘要
|
講題: 液態正義：以類造人的意識形態與治理術Liquid Justice: Ideology and Governmentality of Making up People 譯書發表：《亞斯伯格的孩子們：自閉症在納粹維也納的起源》On Asperger's Children: The Origins of Autism in Nazi Vienna (Chinese edition) 時間：2020年5月5日（二）18:30-21:30 地點：交通大學人社二館106A室（106A HA Building 2 ,NCTU） 自閉症與亞斯伯格症候群的研究先驅——漢斯・亞斯伯格（Hans Asperger），長久以來被視為捍衛身心障礙兒童的仁慈醫生，然而，近年來有不少歷史學者透過生涯歷程、著作與檔案史料的追溯，重新檢視亞斯伯格醫生與納粹優生學及醫療體制的共謀聯繫。《亞斯伯格的孩子們：自閉症在納粹維也納的起源》一書，企圖揭露心理疾病的命名與診斷、醫療制度運作、以及政治意識形態之間的潛在關連。「亞斯伯格」此一人名或是診斷名稱的備受爭議之處，正是引發我們反省當今對於界定「非常態」（abnormality）的閾限或譜系的歷史破口。 主持：朱元鴻Yuan-Horng Chu（交大社會與文化研究所教授） 講者：吳哲良Che-Liang Wu（清華大學書院導師及通識教育中心兼任助理教授） 對談：黃明慧Ming-Hui Huang（英國謝菲爾德大學俄羅斯與斯拉夫研究所博士） *中文演講（英語同步口譯） 主辦單位：國立交通大學文化研究國際中心、亞際文化研究國際碩士學位學程（台灣聯合大學系統）、交通大學社會與文化研究所、交通大學出版社 |
|
演講主題
|
The Role of Ethnography in Studying Taiwan's Migrant Workers and the Broker System |
|
演講日期
|
2020年4月1日 |
|
演講講者
|
Sudarat Musikawong |
|
演講摘要
|
Date：2020/04/01 Time：14:00-17:00 Venue：106A HA Building 2 ,NCTU Lecture Description： The lecture is an informal discussion focused on methodology, primarily about the role of ethnography in the project "Broker & Employer Practices and Working Conditions Foreign Migrant Workers in Taiwan" (Qualitative Study- June 2019-November 2020). This project is still ongoing, in collaboration with faculty and researchers at Mahidol University/ IPSR, NCTU/ICCS and National Dongwa University, Department of Sociology. Taiwan’s formal international labor migration began in March 1989 when the government pursued fourteen large infrastructural projects like Highway 3, the MRT, which utilize the broker system to hire a majority of Thai workers, with Filipinos and Indonesians. That year Taiwan signed the Taiwan Beneficial Relations Act (1989), designating favorable import quotas for the Philippines. By 1992, the process of hiring foreign migrant workers in construction, industry, domestic caretaking, and fisheries sectors became more formalized (Chen, 2006). While after 2005, such infrastructural construction projects slowed, the demand for labor in personal care services, SME factories and both long-and short haul fisheries sectors increased. While some receiving countries like Thailand and South Korea have moved toward Government to Government direct hiring systems through MOU processes and government run migrant worker services, Taiwan continues to utilize the private broker industry (recently amended direct employer hiring), waranting more careful study of broker and employer practices. These developments in Taiwan are rather public and can be followed in the news, but how do we study brokering as social practices. The talk will consider methodological challenges of accessing interviews with broker companies, developing trust with manpower agencies, employers, and migrant worker populations, as well as the demands of NGO/Union solidarity practices in research. |
|
演講主題
|
On the Corporate State |
|
演講日期
|
2020年1月8日 |
|
演講講者
|
Bruce Kapferer、Marina Gold |
|
演講摘要
|
Date：2020.01.08 (Wed.) Time：14:00-17:00 Venue：國立交通大學人社二館 106 / R106 HA Building 2, NCTU (全程英翻中同步口譯) Abstract: A synopsis of an upcoming book, On the Corporate State, jointly authored by Kapferer, Gold and Donald Nonini. 本次講座主題源自講者Kapferer、Gold，以及 Donald Nonini 合著的新書《On the Corporate State》 ，其主要概念以「平等」議題為核心。事實上，「平等」的定義範圍多元，由哲學論述涵蓋至日常實踐的基礎領域。 同時，「平等主義」與「進步」也有同質的意思，因為其明確的主張和意識形態的合法化推動了經濟和文化變遷、政治批判，以及社會運動。這次演講主要探討平等主義計劃中與當代社會危機有關的理論目標，特別是民粹主義運動，以及圖像在儀式傳統、及科技時代中再儀式化現代性的潛力。 |
|
演講主題
|
Egalitarianism and Inequality: A Theoretical & Cross-Cultural Dialogue 「平等主義與不平等事實: 一個理論和泛文化的探討 」研討會 |
|
演講日期
|
2020年1月7日 |
|
演講講者
|
Allen Chun陳奕麟、Bruce Kapferer、Alain Brossat、Derek Sheridan謝力登、Knut Rio、Joyce Liu 劉紀蕙、Ya-Chung Chuang莊雅仲、Bjørn Bertelsen、Yuan-Horng Chu朱元鴻、Kai-Shyh Lin 林開世、Kai-Shyh Lin 林開世、Shu-Fen Lin林淑芬 |
|
演講摘要
|
日期：2020年1月7日(二) 時間：9:10-17:45 地點：國立交通大學人社三館 201 / R201 HA Building 3, NCTU *全程英翻中同步口譯 Simultaneous interpretation (English-Chinese) 其他影片：https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzLn5TDx5vGdH7STGmLsTyzYiObJm37it |
|
演講主題
|
香港論壇：法治、警權、人民 |
|
演講日期
|
2019年12月21日 |
|
演講講者
|
彭麗君、鄭肇祺、陳錦榮、林志潔、葉蔭聰、曾仲堅、容邵武、劉紀蕙、陳奕麟、朱元鴻、林淑芬 |
|
演講摘要
|
自今年（2019）3月15日起，至6月9日大規模爆發的反對《逃犯條例》修訂草案社會運動，至今已經八個月，香港示威堵路活動仍然不絕。雖然《逃犯條例》至今已暫時撤回，但在催淚瓦斯的煙硝不斷，人民對法治與警權的信任基石已然動搖。 詳細簡介：https://iccs.nctu.edu.tw/zh/activity.php?USN=550 其他影片：https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzLn5TDx5vGclg-pq3pG9kONDmpGicpw_ |
|
演講主題
|
Political Transition in Myanmar and the Conflict in Rakhine State Interlinked? |
|
演講日期
|
2019年12月18日 |
|
演講講者
|
Kristina Kironska |
|
演講摘要
|
In this lecture, you will learn about ethnic groups in Asia that are stateless and what that means for them in their daily life. The main focus will, however, be on the Rohingya who have since 2012 left Myanmar's Rakhine State en masse. Who are they and why did they have to flee? How is the conflict in Rakhine State connected to the recent transition process in Myanmar? |
|
演講主題
|
Global Shanghai through Trans-Asian Film & Literature |
|
演講日期
|
2019年12月16日 |
|
演講講者
|
Manas Ghosh |
|
演講摘要
|
Shanghai in the nineteenth century and in the first half of the twentieth century grew as the Paris of Asia. It had a long experience of multiple modernities in the form of colonialism, expansion of overseas trade, industrialisation, underworld, imperial warfare and people’s resistance to the foreign invasion. Shanghai appeared as one of the most cosmopolitan global-cosmopolitan global city. It has become the principal axis of the articulation of post-May 4thChinese modernity. The city has a special historical significance in the context of Indo-China cultural interaction. Rabindranath Tagore visitedShanghai in 1924 and 1928. Shanghai modernity attracted him. In memory of Tagore's visit to China, a bust of Tagore has been installed in a Shanghai locality where he stayed while visiting Shanghai. The paper would discuss a minor novel that portrayed Shanghai. A noted Bengali writer Bibhuti Bhusan Bandyopadhyay in the 1940s wrote a novel called MaranerDonka Baje (The Death Drum Beats)for the Bengali young adults. The novel portrayed Shanghai as two protagonists of the novel ended up their voyage in the city in the time of Sino-Japanese war. The city, as described by Bandyopadhyay had become a space that corresponded with the desire for cosmopolitan modernity, belonged to the heart of the two young Bengali educated young men. In spite of their stay in the city was infested with war-time emergency and crisis, diseased by petty crimes, prostitution and poverty, Shanghai provided them with a kind of emancipatory air, globality and youthfulness. The presentation will discuss the Shanghai Leftwing cinema of the 1930s and the Bengali novel by Bandyapadhyay side by side towards an inter-Asian understanding of the global city Shanghai. |
|
演講主題
|
THE DEMISE OF (STATE) MULTILATERALISM IN THE MULTIPOLAR WORLD; WHY? (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Goran Fejic |
|
演講摘要
|
Why is multilateralism (the idea that international relations should be shaped by commonly agreed rules and implemented for the benefit of all) undergoing a crisis today, precisely at the time when the world seems to become genuinely multi-polar? |
|
演講主題
|
THE DEMISE OF (STATE) MULTILATERALISM IN THE MULTIPOLAR WORLD; WHY? (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Goran Fejic |
|
演講摘要
|
Why is multilateralism (the idea that international relations should be shaped by commonly agreed rules and implemented for the benefit of all) undergoing a crisis today, precisely at the time when the world seems to become genuinely multi-polar? |
|
演講主題
|
THE DEMISE OF (STATE) MULTILATERALISM IN THE MULTIPOLAR WORLD; WHY? (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Goran Fejic |
|
演講摘要
|
Why is multilateralism (the idea that international relations should be shaped by commonly agreed rules and implemented for the benefit of all) undergoing a crisis today, precisely at the time when the world seems to become genuinely multi-polar? |
|
演講主題
|
THE DEMISE OF (STATE) MULTILATERALISM IN THE MULTIPOLAR WORLD; WHY? (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Goran Fejic |
|
演講摘要
|
Why is multilateralism (the idea that international relations should be shaped by commonly agreed rules and implemented for the benefit of all) undergoing a crisis today, precisely at the time when the world seems to become genuinely multi-polar? |
|
演講主題
|
THE DEMISE OF (STATE) MULTILATERALISM IN THE MULTIPOLAR WORLD; WHY? (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Goran Fejic |
|
演講摘要
|
Why is multilateralism (the idea that international relations should be shaped by commonly agreed rules and implemented for the benefit of all) undergoing a crisis today, precisely at the time when the world seems to become genuinely multi-polar? |
|
演講主題
|
THE DEMISE OF (STATE) MULTILATERALISM IN THE MULTIPOLAR WORLD; WHY? (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Goran Fejic |
|
演講摘要
|
Why is multilateralism (the idea that international relations should be shaped by commonly agreed rules and implemented for the benefit of all) undergoing a crisis today, precisely at the time when the world seems to become genuinely multi-polar? |
|
演講主題
|
THE DEMISE OF (STATE) MULTILATERALISM IN THE MULTIPOLAR WORLD; WHY? (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Goran Fejic |
|
演講摘要
|
Why is multilateralism (the idea that international relations should be shaped by commonly agreed rules and implemented for the benefit of all) undergoing a crisis today, precisely at the time when the world seems to become genuinely multi-polar? |
|
演講主題
|
White Slaves/Black Revolutionaries—Who Has the Right to Have Rights? Who Has the Right to Resist? Explorations of the US and the Haitian Revolutions (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月20日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Coterminous with US press coverage of US white “enslavement,” during the Barbary Wars, news of the slave uprisings in the French sugar colony of Saint Domingue hit the US popular press. Were the rebellious slaves in one of the most sadistic plantation slave economies justified in asserting their right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” or did they embody the worst threat to democratic rule—savage black mobs raping and murdering? This talk will explore the evolution of the Haitian Revolution and the radical press’s (in both France and the United States) response to Afro-Caribbean’s assertion to their rights to freedom, political agency and independence from French colonial rule. |
|
演講主題
|
White Slaves/Black Revolutionaries—Who Has the Right to Have Rights? Who Has the Right to Resist? Explorations of the US and the Haitian Revolutions (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月20日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Coterminous with US press coverage of US white “enslavement,” during the Barbary Wars, news of the slave uprisings in the French sugar colony of Saint Domingue hit the US popular press. Were the rebellious slaves in one of the most sadistic plantation slave economies justified in asserting their right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” or did they embody the worst threat to democratic rule—savage black mobs raping and murdering? This talk will explore the evolution of the Haitian Revolution and the radical press’s (in both France and the United States) response to Afro-Caribbean’s assertion to their rights to freedom, political agency and independence from French colonial rule. |
|
演講主題
|
White Slaves/Black Revolutionaries—Who Has the Right to Have Rights? Who Has the Right to Resist? Explorations of the US and the Haitian Revolutions (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月20日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Coterminous with US press coverage of US white “enslavement,” during the Barbary Wars, news of the slave uprisings in the French sugar colony of Saint Domingue hit the US popular press. Were the rebellious slaves in one of the most sadistic plantation slave economies justified in asserting their right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” or did they embody the worst threat to democratic rule—savage black mobs raping and murdering? This talk will explore the evolution of the Haitian Revolution and the radical press’s (in both France and the United States) response to Afro-Caribbean’s assertion to their rights to freedom, political agency and independence from French colonial rule. |
|
演講主題
|
White Slaves/Black Revolutionaries—Who Has the Right to Have Rights? Who Has the Right to Resist? Explorations of the US and the Haitian Revolutions (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月20日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Coterminous with US press coverage of US white “enslavement,” during the Barbary Wars, news of the slave uprisings in the French sugar colony of Saint Domingue hit the US popular press. Were the rebellious slaves in one of the most sadistic plantation slave economies justified in asserting their right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” or did they embody the worst threat to democratic rule—savage black mobs raping and murdering? This talk will explore the evolution of the Haitian Revolution and the radical press’s (in both France and the United States) response to Afro-Caribbean’s assertion to their rights to freedom, political agency and independence from French colonial rule. |
|
演講主題
|
White Slaves/Black Revolutionaries—Who Has the Right to Have Rights? Who Has the Right to Resist? Explorations of the US and the Haitian Revolutions (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月20日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Coterminous with US press coverage of US white “enslavement,” during the Barbary Wars, news of the slave uprisings in the French sugar colony of Saint Domingue hit the US popular press. Were the rebellious slaves in one of the most sadistic plantation slave economies justified in asserting their right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” or did they embody the worst threat to democratic rule—savage black mobs raping and murdering? This talk will explore the evolution of the Haitian Revolution and the radical press’s (in both France and the United States) response to Afro-Caribbean’s assertion to their rights to freedom, political agency and independence from French colonial rule. |
|
演講主題
|
White Slaves/Black Revolutionaries—Who Has the Right to Have Rights? Who Has the Right to Resist? Explorations of the US and the Haitian Revolutions (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月20日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Coterminous with US press coverage of US white “enslavement,” during the Barbary Wars, news of the slave uprisings in the French sugar colony of Saint Domingue hit the US popular press. Were the rebellious slaves in one of the most sadistic plantation slave economies justified in asserting their right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” or did they embody the worst threat to democratic rule—savage black mobs raping and murdering? This talk will explore the evolution of the Haitian Revolution and the radical press’s (in both France and the United States) response to Afro-Caribbean’s assertion to their rights to freedom, political agency and independence from French colonial rule. |
|
演講主題
|
White Slaves/Black Revolutionaries—Who Has the Right to Have Rights? Who Has the Right to Resist? Explorations of the US and the Haitian Revolutions (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月20日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Coterminous with US press coverage of US white “enslavement,” during the Barbary Wars, news of the slave uprisings in the French sugar colony of Saint Domingue hit the US popular press. Were the rebellious slaves in one of the most sadistic plantation slave economies justified in asserting their right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” or did they embody the worst threat to democratic rule—savage black mobs raping and murdering? This talk will explore the evolution of the Haitian Revolution and the radical press’s (in both France and the United States) response to Afro-Caribbean’s assertion to their rights to freedom, political agency and independence from French colonial rule. |
|
演講主題
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演講主題
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演講主題
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演講主題
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演講主題
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演講主題
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演講主題
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演講主題
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (8) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演講主題
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演講主題
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演講主題
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演講主題
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演講主題
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演講主題
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演講主題
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演講主題
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (8) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演講主題
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (9) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演講主題
|
Overcoming individual on success based art practices (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月11日 |
|
演講講者
|
Reinaart Vanhoe |
|
演講摘要
|
In the coming years, I would like to formulate a biotope of what I want to name a ‘caring/imaginative’ (art) practice’. How to understand art for a citizen-scene opposed to art for an art-scene, or culture-scene of a certain educational class. This formulation will, probably, be based on a mix of certain practices in South East Asia. Important for such a practice is how to speak together, how to understand its ecology and how to understand different perspectives of how people enter interactions. There is a need for formulations how these art-practices look like to give confidence and comfort to artists searching for new articulations. It serves to inspire a younger generation growing up with something named ‘global art’. What comes along with collaborations, how to understand the effort, where to locate critique, what is materialisation, where is the audience, who is the audience. |
|
演講主題
|
Overcoming individual on success based art practices (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月11日 |
|
演講講者
|
Reinaart Vanhoe |
|
演講摘要
|
In the coming years, I would like to formulate a biotope of what I want to name a ‘caring/imaginative’ (art) practice’. How to understand art for a citizen-scene opposed to art for an art-scene, or culture-scene of a certain educational class. This formulation will, probably, be based on a mix of certain practices in South East Asia. Important for such a practice is how to speak together, how to understand its ecology and how to understand different perspectives of how people enter interactions. There is a need for formulations how these art-practices look like to give confidence and comfort to artists searching for new articulations. It serves to inspire a younger generation growing up with something named ‘global art’. What comes along with collaborations, how to understand the effort, where to locate critique, what is materialisation, where is the audience, who is the audience. |
|
演講主題
|
Overcoming individual on success based art practices (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月11日 |
|
演講講者
|
Reinaart Vanhoe |
|
演講摘要
|
In the coming years, I would like to formulate a biotope of what I want to name a ‘caring/imaginative’ (art) practice’. How to understand art for a citizen-scene opposed to art for an art-scene, or culture-scene of a certain educational class. This formulation will, probably, be based on a mix of certain practices in South East Asia. Important for such a practice is how to speak together, how to understand its ecology and how to understand different perspectives of how people enter interactions. There is a need for formulations how these art-practices look like to give confidence and comfort to artists searching for new articulations. It serves to inspire a younger generation growing up with something named ‘global art’. What comes along with collaborations, how to understand the effort, where to locate critique, what is materialisation, where is the audience, who is the audience. |
|
演講主題
|
Overcoming individual on success based art practices (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月11日 |
|
演講講者
|
Reinaart Vanhoe |
|
演講摘要
|
In the coming years, I would like to formulate a biotope of what I want to name a ‘caring/imaginative’ (art) practice’. How to understand art for a citizen-scene opposed to art for an art-scene, or culture-scene of a certain educational class. This formulation will, probably, be based on a mix of certain practices in South East Asia. Important for such a practice is how to speak together, how to understand its ecology and how to understand different perspectives of how people enter interactions. There is a need for formulations how these art-practices look like to give confidence and comfort to artists searching for new articulations. It serves to inspire a younger generation growing up with something named ‘global art’. What comes along with collaborations, how to understand the effort, where to locate critique, what is materialisation, where is the audience, who is the audience. |
|
演講主題
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演講講者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講主題
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演講講者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講主題
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演講講者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講主題
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演講講者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講主題
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演講講者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講主題
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演講講者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講主題
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演講講者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講主題
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (8) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演講講者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (許煜) |
|
演講主題
|
Is same-sex marriage in Taiwan (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月30日 |
|
演講講者
|
Alain Naze, Yung-Hao Liu |
|
演講摘要
|
In France, the carrying of same-sex marriage has often been pictured as a progress for gays and lesbians, some people even saying that this legal advance promoting equality would be an extension of the so-called movements for « sexual freedom » in the 1970' – or even their completion. However, a comparative analysis of these two periods (the 1970' and the present) gives prominence strong disparities in terms of demands addressed by gays and lesbians and one might consider that a radical reversal of perspective has taken place in the meantime: some sort of a care for « respectability » seems to have come to light, a complete breach, in the French context, with what the gay philosopher Guy Hocquenghem would have called, in the 1970', a « rogue » (delinquent) homosexuality. Could some specificities of the local situation in Taiwan make that maybe same-sex marriage would be an exception to such a « normalization » of the gays and lesbians? |
|
演講主題
|
Is same-sex marriage in Taiwan (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月30日 |
|
演講講者
|
Alain Naze, Yung-Hao Liu |
|
演講摘要
|
In France, the carrying of same-sex marriage has often been pictured as a progress for gays and lesbians, some people even saying that this legal advance promoting equality would be an extension of the so-called movements for « sexual freedom » in the 1970' – or even their completion. However, a comparative analysis of these two periods (the 1970' and the present) gives prominence strong disparities in terms of demands addressed by gays and lesbians and one might consider that a radical reversal of perspective has taken place in the meantime: some sort of a care for « respectability » seems to have come to light, a complete breach, in the French context, with what the gay philosopher Guy Hocquenghem would have called, in the 1970', a « rogue » (delinquent) homosexuality. Could some specificities of the local situation in Taiwan make that maybe same-sex marriage would be an exception to such a « normalization » of the gays and lesbians? |
|
演講主題
|
Is same-sex marriage in Taiwan (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月30日 |
|
演講講者
|
Alain Naze, Yung-Hao Liu |
|
演講摘要
|
In France, the carrying of same-sex marriage has often been pictured as a progress for gays and lesbians, some people even saying that this legal advance promoting equality would be an extension of the so-called movements for « sexual freedom » in the 1970' – or even their completion. However, a comparative analysis of these two periods (the 1970' and the present) gives prominence strong disparities in terms of demands addressed by gays and lesbians and one might consider that a radical reversal of perspective has taken place in the meantime: some sort of a care for « respectability » seems to have come to light, a complete breach, in the French context, with what the gay philosopher Guy Hocquenghem would have called, in the 1970', a « rogue » (delinquent) homosexuality. Could some specificities of the local situation in Taiwan make that maybe same-sex marriage would be an exception to such a « normalization » of the gays and lesbians? |
|
演講主題
|
Is same-sex marriage in Taiwan (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月30日 |
|
演講講者
|
Alain Naze, Yung-Hao Liu |
|
演講摘要
|
In France, the carrying of same-sex marriage has often been pictured as a progress for gays and lesbians, some people even saying that this legal advance promoting equality would be an extension of the so-called movements for « sexual freedom » in the 1970' – or even their completion. However, a comparative analysis of these two periods (the 1970' and the present) gives prominence strong disparities in terms of demands addressed by gays and lesbians and one might consider that a radical reversal of perspective has taken place in the meantime: some sort of a care for « respectability » seems to have come to light, a complete breach, in the French context, with what the gay philosopher Guy Hocquenghem would have called, in the 1970', a « rogue » (delinquent) homosexuality. Could some specificities of the local situation in Taiwan make that maybe same-sex marriage would be an exception to such a « normalization » of the gays and lesbians? |
|
演講主題
|
Is same-sex marriage in Taiwan (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月30日 |
|
演講講者
|
Alain Naze, Yung-Hao Liu |
|
演講摘要
|
In France, the carrying of same-sex marriage has often been pictured as a progress for gays and lesbians, some people even saying that this legal advance promoting equality would be an extension of the so-called movements for « sexual freedom » in the 1970' – or even their completion. However, a comparative analysis of these two periods (the 1970' and the present) gives prominence strong disparities in terms of demands addressed by gays and lesbians and one might consider that a radical reversal of perspective has taken place in the meantime: some sort of a care for « respectability » seems to have come to light, a complete breach, in the French context, with what the gay philosopher Guy Hocquenghem would have called, in the 1970', a « rogue » (delinquent) homosexuality. Could some specificities of the local situation in Taiwan make that maybe same-sex marriage would be an exception to such a « normalization » of the gays and lesbians? |
|
演講主題
|
Is same-sex marriage in Taiwan (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月30日 |
|
演講講者
|
Alain Naze, Yung-Hao Liu |
|
演講摘要
|
In France, the carrying of same-sex marriage has often been pictured as a progress for gays and lesbians, some people even saying that this legal advance promoting equality would be an extension of the so-called movements for « sexual freedom » in the 1970' – or even their completion. However, a comparative analysis of these two periods (the 1970' and the present) gives prominence strong disparities in terms of demands addressed by gays and lesbians and one might consider that a radical reversal of perspective has taken place in the meantime: some sort of a care for « respectability » seems to have come to light, a complete breach, in the French context, with what the gay philosopher Guy Hocquenghem would have called, in the 1970', a « rogue » (delinquent) homosexuality. Could some specificities of the local situation in Taiwan make that maybe same-sex marriage would be an exception to such a « normalization » of the gays and lesbians? |
|
演講主題
|
Europe and Contemporary Migrations (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Rada Iveković |
|
演講摘要
|
Europe is no exception to the contemporary closure of borders to people from the global south and east, but it is a particularly insidious example of what is going on practically world-wide in the 21st century and within the new world-configuration of powers. Migrations as an ancient human way of being, but at this time as an epochal and global issue, now define the 21st century. In a globalized world, migrations too should be apprehended globally and as a trans-national phenomenon. In the public lecture, as well as in my mini course at the International Institute for Cultural Studies (ICCS/IICS) of National Chiao Tung University, I shall raise some philosophical questions regarding the functioning of exception(s), immunisation and blind-spots within a given political context, and some political questions regarding the responsibility of Europe in this state of affairs. Postfascism and the status of tolerance in capitalism should be addressed, as well as the role of historiography and compared political economy. |
|
演講主題
|
Europe and Contemporary Migrations (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Rada Iveković |
|
演講摘要
|
Europe is no exception to the contemporary closure of borders to people from the global south and east, but it is a particularly insidious example of what is going on practically world-wide in the 21st century and within the new world-configuration of powers. Migrations as an ancient human way of being, but at this time as an epochal and global issue, now define the 21st century. In a globalized world, migrations too should be apprehended globally and as a trans-national phenomenon. In the public lecture, as well as in my mini course at the International Institute for Cultural Studies (ICCS/IICS) of National Chiao Tung University, I shall raise some philosophical questions regarding the functioning of exception(s), immunisation and blind-spots within a given political context, and some political questions regarding the responsibility of Europe in this state of affairs. Postfascism and the status of tolerance in capitalism should be addressed, as well as the role of historiography and compared political economy. |
|
演講主題
|
Europe and Contemporary Migrations (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Rada Iveković |
|
演講摘要
|
Europe is no exception to the contemporary closure of borders to people from the global south and east, but it is a particularly insidious example of what is going on practically world-wide in the 21st century and within the new world-configuration of powers. Migrations as an ancient human way of being, but at this time as an epochal and global issue, now define the 21st century. In a globalized world, migrations too should be apprehended globally and as a trans-national phenomenon. In the public lecture, as well as in my mini course at the International Institute for Cultural Studies (ICCS/IICS) of National Chiao Tung University, I shall raise some philosophical questions regarding the functioning of exception(s), immunisation and blind-spots within a given political context, and some political questions regarding the responsibility of Europe in this state of affairs. Postfascism and the status of tolerance in capitalism should be addressed, as well as the role of historiography and compared political economy. |
|
演講主題
|
Europe and Contemporary Migrations (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Rada Iveković |
|
演講摘要
|
Europe is no exception to the contemporary closure of borders to people from the global south and east, but it is a particularly insidious example of what is going on practically world-wide in the 21st century and within the new world-configuration of powers. Migrations as an ancient human way of being, but at this time as an epochal and global issue, now define the 21st century. In a globalized world, migrations too should be apprehended globally and as a trans-national phenomenon. In the public lecture, as well as in my mini course at the International Institute for Cultural Studies (ICCS/IICS) of National Chiao Tung University, I shall raise some philosophical questions regarding the functioning of exception(s), immunisation and blind-spots within a given political context, and some political questions regarding the responsibility of Europe in this state of affairs. Postfascism and the status of tolerance in capitalism should be addressed, as well as the role of historiography and compared political economy. |
|
演講主題
|
Lecture: The Tree Remember (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月14日 |
|
演講講者
|
LAU Kek-huat |
|
演講摘要
|
Derived from the proverb "What the axe forgets, the tree remembers", presents the current situation in Malaysia whereas the racial policy is still practised in Malaysia and the victims forced to have remained in silence. This film tackles the origin of racism in Malaysia and the taboo of racial riot in 1969. |
|
演講主題
|
Lecture: The Tree Remember (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月14日 |
|
演講講者
|
LAU Kek-huat |
|
演講摘要
|
Derived from the proverb "What the axe forgets, the tree remembers", presents the current situation in Malaysia whereas the racial policy is still practised in Malaysia and the victims forced to have remained in silence. This film tackles the origin of racism in Malaysia and the taboo of racial riot in 1969. |
|
演講主題
|
Lecture: The Tree Remember (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月14日 |
|
演講講者
|
LAU Kek-huat |
|
演講摘要
|
Derived from the proverb "What the axe forgets, the tree remembers", presents the current situation in Malaysia whereas the racial policy is still practised in Malaysia and the victims forced to have remained in silence. This film tackles the origin of racism in Malaysia and the taboo of racial riot in 1969. |
|
演講主題
|
Insurgent Mobilities (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月09日 |
|
演講講者
|
Maple J. Razsa |
|
演講摘要
|
In 2015–2016, 1.2 million refugees sought safety in Europe via the Balkan Route. How, in an era of securitized borders, did this unprecedented movement of people from the global south reach the global north? Ethnographic research from two post-Yugoslav nodes along the Route—Preshevë, Serbia and Ljubljana, Slovenia—offers answers that diverge from state-centric accounts, revealing that the relationships between movements, in the sense of both migration and activism, were integral to the dynamics of the Route. |
|
演講主題
|
Insurgent Mobilities (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月09日 |
|
演講講者
|
Maple J. Razsa |
|
演講摘要
|
In 2015–2016, 1.2 million refugees sought safety in Europe via the Balkan Route. How, in an era of securitized borders, did this unprecedented movement of people from the global south reach the global north? Ethnographic research from two post-Yugoslav nodes along the Route—Preshevë, Serbia and Ljubljana, Slovenia—offers answers that diverge from state-centric accounts, revealing that the relationships between movements, in the sense of both migration and activism, were integral to the dynamics of the Route. |
|
演講主題
|
Insurgent Mobilities (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月09日 |
|
演講講者
|
Maple J. Razsa |
|
演講摘要
|
In 2015–2016, 1.2 million refugees sought safety in Europe via the Balkan Route. How, in an era of securitized borders, did this unprecedented movement of people from the global south reach the global north? Ethnographic research from two post-Yugoslav nodes along the Route—Preshevë, Serbia and Ljubljana, Slovenia—offers answers that diverge from state-centric accounts, revealing that the relationships between movements, in the sense of both migration and activism, were integral to the dynamics of the Route. |
|
演講主題
|
Insurgent Mobilities (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月09日 |
|
演講講者
|
Maple J. Razsa |
|
演講摘要
|
In 2015–2016, 1.2 million refugees sought safety in Europe via the Balkan Route. How, in an era of securitized borders, did this unprecedented movement of people from the global south reach the global north? Ethnographic research from two post-Yugoslav nodes along the Route—Preshevë, Serbia and Ljubljana, Slovenia—offers answers that diverge from state-centric accounts, revealing that the relationships between movements, in the sense of both migration and activism, were integral to the dynamics of the Route. |
|
演講主題
|
Insurgent Mobilities (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月09日 |
|
演講講者
|
Maple J. Razsa |
|
演講摘要
|
In 2015–2016, 1.2 million refugees sought safety in Europe via the Balkan Route. How, in an era of securitized borders, did this unprecedented movement of people from the global south reach the global north? Ethnographic research from two post-Yugoslav nodes along the Route—Preshevë, Serbia and Ljubljana, Slovenia—offers answers that diverge from state-centric accounts, revealing that the relationships between movements, in the sense of both migration and activism, were integral to the dynamics of the Route. |
|
演講主題
|
Insurgent Mobilities (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月09日 |
|
演講講者
|
Maple J. Razsa |
|
演講摘要
|
In 2015–2016, 1.2 million refugees sought safety in Europe via the Balkan Route. How, in an era of securitized borders, did this unprecedented movement of people from the global south reach the global north? Ethnographic research from two post-Yugoslav nodes along the Route—Preshevë, Serbia and Ljubljana, Slovenia—offers answers that diverge from state-centric accounts, revealing that the relationships between movements, in the sense of both migration and activism, were integral to the dynamics of the Route. |
|
演講主題
|
Insurgent Mobilities (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月09日 |
|
演講講者
|
Maple J. Razsa |
|
演講摘要
|
In 2015–2016, 1.2 million refugees sought safety in Europe via the Balkan Route. How, in an era of securitized borders, did this unprecedented movement of people from the global south reach the global north? Ethnographic research from two post-Yugoslav nodes along the Route—Preshevë, Serbia and Ljubljana, Slovenia—offers answers that diverge from state-centric accounts, revealing that the relationships between movements, in the sense of both migration and activism, were integral to the dynamics of the Route. |
|
演講主題
|
Africa Rising? BRICS – Diversifying Dependency (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月02日 |
|
演講講者
|
Ian Taylor |
|
演講摘要
|
Africa is said to be rising, turning a definitive page in its history, heralding new and exciting possibilities for the continent. This discourse maintains that with upsurge in economic growth comes improved governance and endogenous dynamics; that the emerging economies, and especially the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India China, South Africa), have been instrumental in diversifying Africa's international relations, perhaps leading to a radical change in the global order, favourable to the developing world. But to what extent is this true, and how deep and how broad has been the impact on society at large? This book takes a critical look at the prevalent Africa Rising discourse, and explores the nature and implications of Africa's "rise" and the role that the BRICS have played in it. The author argues that Africa has still to undergo any structural transformation; that there is strong evidence that deindustrialisation and jobless growth have accompanied the upsurge of interest in the continent; and that far from making a radical turn in its developmental trajectory, Africa is being pushed into the resource corner as commodity exporters, to the North (and now, the BRICS) with little scope for industrial progress or skills advancement. Hope that the BRICS might offer an alternative to the extant neoliberal order are misplaced, for the BRICS have a stake in maintaining the current global unequality. Africa must therefore fashion its own independent path - while the emerging economies will be important, relying on external actors may simply reproduce anew the current state of underdevelopment. |
|
演講主題
|
Africa Rising? BRICS – Diversifying Dependency (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月02日 |
|
演講講者
|
Ian Taylor |
|
演講摘要
|
Africa is said to be rising, turning a definitive page in its history, heralding new and exciting possibilities for the continent. This discourse maintains that with upsurge in economic growth comes improved governance and endogenous dynamics; that the emerging economies, and especially the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India China, South Africa), have been instrumental in diversifying Africa's international relations, perhaps leading to a radical change in the global order, favourable to the developing world. But to what extent is this true, and how deep and how broad has been the impact on society at large? This book takes a critical look at the prevalent Africa Rising discourse, and explores the nature and implications of Africa's "rise" and the role that the BRICS have played in it. The author argues that Africa has still to undergo any structural transformation; that there is strong evidence that deindustrialisation and jobless growth have accompanied the upsurge of interest in the continent; and that far from making a radical turn in its developmental trajectory, Africa is being pushed into the resource corner as commodity exporters, to the North (and now, the BRICS) with little scope for industrial progress or skills advancement. Hope that the BRICS might offer an alternative to the extant neoliberal order are misplaced, for the BRICS have a stake in maintaining the current global unequality. Africa must therefore fashion its own independent path - while the emerging economies will be important, relying on external actors may simply reproduce anew the current state of underdevelopment. |
|
演講主題
|
Africa Rising? BRICS – Diversifying Dependency (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月02日 |
|
演講講者
|
Ian Taylor |
|
演講摘要
|
Africa is said to be rising, turning a definitive page in its history, heralding new and exciting possibilities for the continent. This discourse maintains that with upsurge in economic growth comes improved governance and endogenous dynamics; that the emerging economies, and especially the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India China, South Africa), have been instrumental in diversifying Africa's international relations, perhaps leading to a radical change in the global order, favourable to the developing world. But to what extent is this true, and how deep and how broad has been the impact on society at large? This book takes a critical look at the prevalent Africa Rising discourse, and explores the nature and implications of Africa's "rise" and the role that the BRICS have played in it. The author argues that Africa has still to undergo any structural transformation; that there is strong evidence that deindustrialisation and jobless growth have accompanied the upsurge of interest in the continent; and that far from making a radical turn in its developmental trajectory, Africa is being pushed into the resource corner as commodity exporters, to the North (and now, the BRICS) with little scope for industrial progress or skills advancement. Hope that the BRICS might offer an alternative to the extant neoliberal order are misplaced, for the BRICS have a stake in maintaining the current global unequality. Africa must therefore fashion its own independent path - while the emerging economies will be important, relying on external actors may simply reproduce anew the current state of underdevelopment. |
|
演講主題
|
Africa Rising? BRICS – Diversifying Dependency (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月02日 |
|
演講講者
|
Ian Taylor |
|
演講摘要
|
Africa is said to be rising, turning a definitive page in its history, heralding new and exciting possibilities for the continent. This discourse maintains that with upsurge in economic growth comes improved governance and endogenous dynamics; that the emerging economies, and especially the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India China, South Africa), have been instrumental in diversifying Africa's international relations, perhaps leading to a radical change in the global order, favourable to the developing world. But to what extent is this true, and how deep and how broad has been the impact on society at large? This book takes a critical look at the prevalent Africa Rising discourse, and explores the nature and implications of Africa's "rise" and the role that the BRICS have played in it. The author argues that Africa has still to undergo any structural transformation; that there is strong evidence that deindustrialisation and jobless growth have accompanied the upsurge of interest in the continent; and that far from making a radical turn in its developmental trajectory, Africa is being pushed into the resource corner as commodity exporters, to the North (and now, the BRICS) with little scope for industrial progress or skills advancement. Hope that the BRICS might offer an alternative to the extant neoliberal order are misplaced, for the BRICS have a stake in maintaining the current global unequality. Africa must therefore fashion its own independent path - while the emerging economies will be important, relying on external actors may simply reproduce anew the current state of underdevelopment. |
|
演講主題
|
Africa Rising? BRICS – Diversifying Dependency (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月02日 |
|
演講講者
|
Ian Taylor |
|
演講摘要
|
Africa is said to be rising, turning a definitive page in its history, heralding new and exciting possibilities for the continent. This discourse maintains that with upsurge in economic growth comes improved governance and endogenous dynamics; that the emerging economies, and especially the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India China, South Africa), have been instrumental in diversifying Africa's international relations, perhaps leading to a radical change in the global order, favourable to the developing world. But to what extent is this true, and how deep and how broad has been the impact on society at large? This book takes a critical look at the prevalent Africa Rising discourse, and explores the nature and implications of Africa's "rise" and the role that the BRICS have played in it. The author argues that Africa has still to undergo any structural transformation; that there is strong evidence that deindustrialisation and jobless growth have accompanied the upsurge of interest in the continent; and that far from making a radical turn in its developmental trajectory, Africa is being pushed into the resource corner as commodity exporters, to the North (and now, the BRICS) with little scope for industrial progress or skills advancement. Hope that the BRICS might offer an alternative to the extant neoliberal order are misplaced, for the BRICS have a stake in maintaining the current global unequality. Africa must therefore fashion its own independent path - while the emerging economies will be important, relying on external actors may simply reproduce anew the current state of underdevelopment. |
|
演講主題
|
The Rise of China and the US-led World Order (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月01日 |
|
演講講者
|
Li Xing |
|
演講摘要
|
內容簡介: 講座著重分析和解讀中國崛起對現存美國主導的世界秩序所産生的重大影響，並從不同的角度以及多層次的解析，將全球化，現行世界秩序的危機以及中國崛起這些問題建構在一個立體的架構，全面地分析中國崛起過程中與美國為主導的資本主義世界秩序之間的既有融合合作又有矛盾沖突的複雜關系。講座通過結合一些主流國際關系和國際政治經濟理論視角的討論和反思，指出中國崛起所帶來的複雜性，挑戰性和不確定性。世界秩序的主導權(hegemony)已經進入到”相互依存主導權” ( interdependent hegemony)的時代。 *中文演講 (Chinese Lectures) |
|
演講主題
|
The Rise of China and the US-led World Order (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月01日 |
|
演講講者
|
Li Xing |
|
演講摘要
|
內容簡介: 講座著重分析和解讀中國崛起對現存美國主導的世界秩序所産生的重大影響，並從不同的角度以及多層次的解析，將全球化，現行世界秩序的危機以及中國崛起這些問題建構在一個立體的架構，全面地分析中國崛起過程中與美國為主導的資本主義世界秩序之間的既有融合合作又有矛盾沖突的複雜關系。講座通過結合一些主流國際關系和國際政治經濟理論視角的討論和反思，指出中國崛起所帶來的複雜性，挑戰性和不確定性。世界秩序的主導權(hegemony)已經進入到”相互依存主導權” ( interdependent hegemony)的時代。 *中文演講 (Chinese Lectures) |
|
演講主題
|
The Rise of China and the US-led World Order (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月01日 |
|
演講講者
|
Li Xing |
|
演講摘要
|
內容簡介: 講座著重分析和解讀中國崛起對現存美國主導的世界秩序所産生的重大影響，並從不同的角度以及多層次的解析，將全球化，現行世界秩序的危機以及中國崛起這些問題建構在一個立體的架構，全面地分析中國崛起過程中與美國為主導的資本主義世界秩序之間的既有融合合作又有矛盾沖突的複雜關系。講座通過結合一些主流國際關系和國際政治經濟理論視角的討論和反思，指出中國崛起所帶來的複雜性，挑戰性和不確定性。世界秩序的主導權(hegemony)已經進入到”相互依存主導權” ( interdependent hegemony)的時代。 *中文演講 (Chinese Lectures) |
|
演講主題
|
The Rise of China and the US-led World Order (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月01日 |
|
演講講者
|
Li Xing |
|
演講摘要
|
內容簡介: 講座著重分析和解讀中國崛起對現存美國主導的世界秩序所産生的重大影響，並從不同的角度以及多層次的解析，將全球化，現行世界秩序的危機以及中國崛起這些問題建構在一個立體的架構，全面地分析中國崛起過程中與美國為主導的資本主義世界秩序之間的既有融合合作又有矛盾沖突的複雜關系。講座通過結合一些主流國際關系和國際政治經濟理論視角的討論和反思，指出中國崛起所帶來的複雜性，挑戰性和不確定性。世界秩序的主導權(hegemony)已經進入到”相互依存主導權” ( interdependent hegemony)的時代。 *中文演講 (Chinese Lectures) |
|
演講主題
|
The Rise of China and the US-led World Order (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月01日 |
|
演講講者
|
Li Xing |
|
演講摘要
|
內容簡介: 講座著重分析和解讀中國崛起對現存美國主導的世界秩序所産生的重大影響，並從不同的角度以及多層次的解析，將全球化，現行世界秩序的危機以及中國崛起這些問題建構在一個立體的架構，全面地分析中國崛起過程中與美國為主導的資本主義世界秩序之間的既有融合合作又有矛盾沖突的複雜關系。講座通過結合一些主流國際關系和國際政治經濟理論視角的討論和反思，指出中國崛起所帶來的複雜性，挑戰性和不確定性。世界秩序的主導權(hegemony)已經進入到”相互依存主導權” ( interdependent hegemony)的時代。 *中文演講 (Chinese Lectures) |
|
演講主題
|
The Rise of China and the US-led World Order (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年10月01日 |
|
演講講者
|
Li Xing |
|
演講摘要
|
內容簡介: 講座著重分析和解讀中國崛起對現存美國主導的世界秩序所産生的重大影響，並從不同的角度以及多層次的解析，將全球化，現行世界秩序的危機以及中國崛起這些問題建構在一個立體的架構，全面地分析中國崛起過程中與美國為主導的資本主義世界秩序之間的既有融合合作又有矛盾沖突的複雜關系。講座通過結合一些主流國際關系和國際政治經濟理論視角的討論和反思，指出中國崛起所帶來的複雜性，挑戰性和不確定性。世界秩序的主導權(hegemony)已經進入到”相互依存主導權” ( interdependent hegemony)的時代。 *中文演講 (Chinese Lectures) |
|
演講主題
|
Queer Radiance: Disability, Sexuality, and Vision (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年09月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演講摘要
|
In this talk, Professor Villarejo will introduce to students an intersectional approach to disability studies, gender studies, queer theory, and TV studies. |
|
演講主題
|
Queer Radiance: Disability, Sexuality, and Vision (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年09月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演講摘要
|
In this talk, Professor Villarejo will introduce to students an intersectional approach to disability studies, gender studies, queer theory, and TV studies. |
|
演講主題
|
Queer Radiance: Disability, Sexuality, and Vision (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年09月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演講摘要
|
In this talk, Professor Villarejo will introduce to students an intersectional approach to disability studies, gender studies, queer theory, and TV studies. |
|
演講主題
|
Queer Radiance: Disability, Sexuality, and Vision (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年09月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演講摘要
|
In this talk, Professor Villarejo will introduce to students an intersectional approach to disability studies, gender studies, queer theory, and TV studies. |
|
演講主題
|
Queer Sentiment on Television Venue (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年09月26日 |
|
演講講者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演講摘要
|
A helpful tradition of queer theory — from Lauren Berlant to others involved in the collective called “political emotions” — has helped us to understand sentiment as a power wielded socially and historically, in which the public is sustained and defined through shared feeling. This talk examines how sentiment is activated in the particular mode of crying in response to television programs, using recent examples from Queer Eye and the reboot of Tales of the City. |
|
演講主題
|
Queer Sentiment on Television Venue (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年09月26日 |
|
演講講者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演講摘要
|
A helpful tradition of queer theory — from Lauren Berlant to others involved in the collective called “political emotions” — has helped us to understand sentiment as a power wielded socially and historically, in which the public is sustained and defined through shared feeling. This talk examines how sentiment is activated in the particular mode of crying in response to television programs, using recent examples from Queer Eye and the reboot of Tales of the City. |
|
演講主題
|
Queer Sentiment on Television Venue (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年09月26日 |
|
演講講者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演講摘要
|
A helpful tradition of queer theory — from Lauren Berlant to others involved in the collective called “political emotions” — has helped us to understand sentiment as a power wielded socially and historically, in which the public is sustained and defined through shared feeling. This talk examines how sentiment is activated in the particular mode of crying in response to television programs, using recent examples from Queer Eye and the reboot of Tales of the City. |
|
演講主題
|
Queer Sentiment on Television Venue (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年09月26日 |
|
演講講者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演講摘要
|
A helpful tradition of queer theory — from Lauren Berlant to others involved in the collective called “political emotions” — has helped us to understand sentiment as a power wielded socially and historically, in which the public is sustained and defined through shared feeling. This talk examines how sentiment is activated in the particular mode of crying in response to television programs, using recent examples from Queer Eye and the reboot of Tales of the City. |
|
演講主題
|
Queer Sentiment on Television Venue (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年09月26日 |
|
演講講者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演講摘要
|
A helpful tradition of queer theory — from Lauren Berlant to others involved in the collective called “political emotions” — has helped us to understand sentiment as a power wielded socially and historically, in which the public is sustained and defined through shared feeling. This talk examines how sentiment is activated in the particular mode of crying in response to television programs, using recent examples from Queer Eye and the reboot of Tales of the City. |
|
演講主題
|
Queer Sentiment on Television Venue (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年09月26日 |
|
演講講者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演講摘要
|
A helpful tradition of queer theory — from Lauren Berlant to others involved in the collective called “political emotions” — has helped us to understand sentiment as a power wielded socially and historically, in which the public is sustained and defined through shared feeling. This talk examines how sentiment is activated in the particular mode of crying in response to television programs, using recent examples from Queer Eye and the reboot of Tales of the City. |
|
演講主題
|
Queer Sentiment on Television Venue (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年09月26日 |
|
演講講者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演講摘要
|
A helpful tradition of queer theory — from Lauren Berlant to others involved in the collective called “political emotions” — has helped us to understand sentiment as a power wielded socially and historically, in which the public is sustained and defined through shared feeling. This talk examines how sentiment is activated in the particular mode of crying in response to television programs, using recent examples from Queer Eye and the reboot of Tales of the City. |
|
演講主題
|
難民與移工：馬來西亞的平行社會 (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月06日 |
|
演講講者
|
唐南發(Josh Hong) |
|
演講摘要
|
自1970年代中開始，馬來西亞就成為東南亞難民暫居的主要國家之一，四十幾年來收容過來自菲律賓，越南，柬埔寨，印尼，緬甸，泰國以及世界其他地區的難民。 但馬來西亞並未簽署1951年聯合國的難民公約，因此無義務為這些人士提供教育，醫療和就業機會，於是這些責任主要由駐在馬來西亞的聯合國難民署(United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR)扛下來。直至今日，有高達16萬的各國難民和尋求庇護者向UNHCR登記，這個數字尚未包括因菲律賓南部動亂而長期居住在沙巴，難以估算的菲律賓籍人口。 除此之外，馬來西亞還擁有人數龐大的移工群體，是東南亞主要的移工接收國之一。根據人力資源部數據，截至2018年底為止，馬來西亞有證照(documented)的各國移工達180萬，主要來自印尼，孟加拉，尼泊爾，印度和緬甸，而在這個數字之上還有人數可能達到300萬的無證照(undocumented)移工。 換句話說，馬來西亞人口僅僅3200萬，竟然有將近500萬的外籍人士 - 絕大多數還是無證照者 - 居住其中，難怪這個議題經常成為媒體和公眾的焦點，也是政治人物借題發揮的素材。 無論難民或移工，其實幾乎都以一種無形的方式存在，和主流馬來西亞社會並行，形成了所謂“平行社會”的現象。儘管這些群體為馬來西亞經濟作出巨大貢獻，基於對國家體制缺乏人權保障的恐懼，加上對主流社會的不信任，他們於教育，就業甚至經貿層面衍生出一套求存的策略。 本次交流旨在透過馬來西亞特殊的歷史，宗教，族群和文化脈絡，分享他們與一般民眾時而緊張，時而有趣而正面的互動，并解構馬來西亞作為一個“三大族群同心同德”國家的荒謬與謎思。 |
|
演講主題
|
難民與移工：馬來西亞的平行社會 (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月06日 |
|
演講講者
|
唐南發(Josh Hong) |
|
演講摘要
|
自1970年代中開始，馬來西亞就成為東南亞難民暫居的主要國家之一，四十幾年來收容過來自菲律賓，越南，柬埔寨，印尼，緬甸，泰國以及世界其他地區的難民。 但馬來西亞並未簽署1951年聯合國的難民公約，因此無義務為這些人士提供教育，醫療和就業機會，於是這些責任主要由駐在馬來西亞的聯合國難民署(United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR)扛下來。直至今日，有高達16萬的各國難民和尋求庇護者向UNHCR登記，這個數字尚未包括因菲律賓南部動亂而長期居住在沙巴，難以估算的菲律賓籍人口。 除此之外，馬來西亞還擁有人數龐大的移工群體，是東南亞主要的移工接收國之一。根據人力資源部數據，截至2018年底為止，馬來西亞有證照(documented)的各國移工達180萬，主要來自印尼，孟加拉，尼泊爾，印度和緬甸，而在這個數字之上還有人數可能達到300萬的無證照(undocumented)移工。 換句話說，馬來西亞人口僅僅3200萬，竟然有將近500萬的外籍人士 - 絕大多數還是無證照者 - 居住其中，難怪這個議題經常成為媒體和公眾的焦點，也是政治人物借題發揮的素材。 無論難民或移工，其實幾乎都以一種無形的方式存在，和主流馬來西亞社會並行，形成了所謂“平行社會”的現象。儘管這些群體為馬來西亞經濟作出巨大貢獻，基於對國家體制缺乏人權保障的恐懼，加上對主流社會的不信任，他們於教育，就業甚至經貿層面衍生出一套求存的策略。 本次交流旨在透過馬來西亞特殊的歷史，宗教，族群和文化脈絡，分享他們與一般民眾時而緊張，時而有趣而正面的互動，并解構馬來西亞作為一個“三大族群同心同德”國家的荒謬與謎思。 |
|
演講主題
|
難民與移工：馬來西亞的平行社會 (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月06日 |
|
演講講者
|
唐南發(Josh Hong) |
|
演講摘要
|
自1970年代中開始，馬來西亞就成為東南亞難民暫居的主要國家之一，四十幾年來收容過來自菲律賓，越南，柬埔寨，印尼，緬甸，泰國以及世界其他地區的難民。 但馬來西亞並未簽署1951年聯合國的難民公約，因此無義務為這些人士提供教育，醫療和就業機會，於是這些責任主要由駐在馬來西亞的聯合國難民署(United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR)扛下來。直至今日，有高達16萬的各國難民和尋求庇護者向UNHCR登記，這個數字尚未包括因菲律賓南部動亂而長期居住在沙巴，難以估算的菲律賓籍人口。 除此之外，馬來西亞還擁有人數龐大的移工群體，是東南亞主要的移工接收國之一。根據人力資源部數據，截至2018年底為止，馬來西亞有證照(documented)的各國移工達180萬，主要來自印尼，孟加拉，尼泊爾，印度和緬甸，而在這個數字之上還有人數可能達到300萬的無證照(undocumented)移工。 換句話說，馬來西亞人口僅僅3200萬，竟然有將近500萬的外籍人士 - 絕大多數還是無證照者 - 居住其中，難怪這個議題經常成為媒體和公眾的焦點，也是政治人物借題發揮的素材。 無論難民或移工，其實幾乎都以一種無形的方式存在，和主流馬來西亞社會並行，形成了所謂“平行社會”的現象。儘管這些群體為馬來西亞經濟作出巨大貢獻，基於對國家體制缺乏人權保障的恐懼，加上對主流社會的不信任，他們於教育，就業甚至經貿層面衍生出一套求存的策略。 本次交流旨在透過馬來西亞特殊的歷史，宗教，族群和文化脈絡，分享他們與一般民眾時而緊張，時而有趣而正面的互動，并解構馬來西亞作為一個“三大族群同心同德”國家的荒謬與謎思。 |
|
演講主題
|
難民與移工：馬來西亞的平行社會 (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月06日 |
|
演講講者
|
唐南發(Josh Hong) |
|
演講摘要
|
自1970年代中開始，馬來西亞就成為東南亞難民暫居的主要國家之一，四十幾年來收容過來自菲律賓，越南，柬埔寨，印尼，緬甸，泰國以及世界其他地區的難民。 但馬來西亞並未簽署1951年聯合國的難民公約，因此無義務為這些人士提供教育，醫療和就業機會，於是這些責任主要由駐在馬來西亞的聯合國難民署(United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR)扛下來。直至今日，有高達16萬的各國難民和尋求庇護者向UNHCR登記，這個數字尚未包括因菲律賓南部動亂而長期居住在沙巴，難以估算的菲律賓籍人口。 除此之外，馬來西亞還擁有人數龐大的移工群體，是東南亞主要的移工接收國之一。根據人力資源部數據，截至2018年底為止，馬來西亞有證照(documented)的各國移工達180萬，主要來自印尼，孟加拉，尼泊爾，印度和緬甸，而在這個數字之上還有人數可能達到300萬的無證照(undocumented)移工。 換句話說，馬來西亞人口僅僅3200萬，竟然有將近500萬的外籍人士 - 絕大多數還是無證照者 - 居住其中，難怪這個議題經常成為媒體和公眾的焦點，也是政治人物借題發揮的素材。 無論難民或移工，其實幾乎都以一種無形的方式存在，和主流馬來西亞社會並行，形成了所謂“平行社會”的現象。儘管這些群體為馬來西亞經濟作出巨大貢獻，基於對國家體制缺乏人權保障的恐懼，加上對主流社會的不信任，他們於教育，就業甚至經貿層面衍生出一套求存的策略。 本次交流旨在透過馬來西亞特殊的歷史，宗教，族群和文化脈絡，分享他們與一般民眾時而緊張，時而有趣而正面的互動，并解構馬來西亞作為一個“三大族群同心同德”國家的荒謬與謎思。 |
|
演講主題
|
難民與移工：馬來西亞的平行社會 (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月06日 |
|
演講講者
|
唐南發(Josh Hong) |
|
演講摘要
|
自1970年代中開始，馬來西亞就成為東南亞難民暫居的主要國家之一，四十幾年來收容過來自菲律賓，越南，柬埔寨，印尼，緬甸，泰國以及世界其他地區的難民。 但馬來西亞並未簽署1951年聯合國的難民公約，因此無義務為這些人士提供教育，醫療和就業機會，於是這些責任主要由駐在馬來西亞的聯合國難民署(United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR)扛下來。直至今日，有高達16萬的各國難民和尋求庇護者向UNHCR登記，這個數字尚未包括因菲律賓南部動亂而長期居住在沙巴，難以估算的菲律賓籍人口。 除此之外，馬來西亞還擁有人數龐大的移工群體，是東南亞主要的移工接收國之一。根據人力資源部數據，截至2018年底為止，馬來西亞有證照(documented)的各國移工達180萬，主要來自印尼，孟加拉，尼泊爾，印度和緬甸，而在這個數字之上還有人數可能達到300萬的無證照(undocumented)移工。 換句話說，馬來西亞人口僅僅3200萬，竟然有將近500萬的外籍人士 - 絕大多數還是無證照者 - 居住其中，難怪這個議題經常成為媒體和公眾的焦點，也是政治人物借題發揮的素材。 無論難民或移工，其實幾乎都以一種無形的方式存在，和主流馬來西亞社會並行，形成了所謂“平行社會”的現象。儘管這些群體為馬來西亞經濟作出巨大貢獻，基於對國家體制缺乏人權保障的恐懼，加上對主流社會的不信任，他們於教育，就業甚至經貿層面衍生出一套求存的策略。 本次交流旨在透過馬來西亞特殊的歷史，宗教，族群和文化脈絡，分享他們與一般民眾時而緊張，時而有趣而正面的互動，并解構馬來西亞作為一個“三大族群同心同德”國家的荒謬與謎思。 |
|
演講主題
|
難民與移工：馬來西亞的平行社會 (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月06日 |
|
演講講者
|
唐南發(Josh Hong) |
|
演講摘要
|
自1970年代中開始，馬來西亞就成為東南亞難民暫居的主要國家之一，四十幾年來收容過來自菲律賓，越南，柬埔寨，印尼，緬甸，泰國以及世界其他地區的難民。 但馬來西亞並未簽署1951年聯合國的難民公約，因此無義務為這些人士提供教育，醫療和就業機會，於是這些責任主要由駐在馬來西亞的聯合國難民署(United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR)扛下來。直至今日，有高達16萬的各國難民和尋求庇護者向UNHCR登記，這個數字尚未包括因菲律賓南部動亂而長期居住在沙巴，難以估算的菲律賓籍人口。 除此之外，馬來西亞還擁有人數龐大的移工群體，是東南亞主要的移工接收國之一。根據人力資源部數據，截至2018年底為止，馬來西亞有證照(documented)的各國移工達180萬，主要來自印尼，孟加拉，尼泊爾，印度和緬甸，而在這個數字之上還有人數可能達到300萬的無證照(undocumented)移工。 換句話說，馬來西亞人口僅僅3200萬，竟然有將近500萬的外籍人士 - 絕大多數還是無證照者 - 居住其中，難怪這個議題經常成為媒體和公眾的焦點，也是政治人物借題發揮的素材。 無論難民或移工，其實幾乎都以一種無形的方式存在，和主流馬來西亞社會並行，形成了所謂“平行社會”的現象。儘管這些群體為馬來西亞經濟作出巨大貢獻，基於對國家體制缺乏人權保障的恐懼，加上對主流社會的不信任，他們於教育，就業甚至經貿層面衍生出一套求存的策略。 本次交流旨在透過馬來西亞特殊的歷史，宗教，族群和文化脈絡，分享他們與一般民眾時而緊張，時而有趣而正面的互動，并解構馬來西亞作為一個“三大族群同心同德”國家的荒謬與謎思。 |
|
演講主題
|
Another way of making philosophy (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月11日 |
|
演講講者
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou |
|
演講摘要
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou是希臘愛琴(海)大學教育哲學與應用哲學系教授，愛琴海大學應用哲學研究中心主任。Elena Theodoropoulou主要研究領域為應用哲學及其多元型態、教育倫理及其實務型態，哲學的當代邏輯性。她在希臘引進兒童教育哲學之對話與反思、從哲學探討職場倫理等。 |
|
演講主題
|
Another way of making philosophy (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月11日 |
|
演講講者
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou |
|
演講摘要
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou是希臘愛琴(海)大學教育哲學與應用哲學系教授，愛琴海大學應用哲學研究中心主任。Elena Theodoropoulou主要研究領域為應用哲學及其多元型態、教育倫理及其實務型態，哲學的當代邏輯性。她在希臘引進兒童教育哲學之對話與反思、從哲學探討職場倫理等。 |
|
演講主題
|
Another way of making philosophy (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月11日 |
|
演講講者
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou |
|
演講摘要
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou是希臘愛琴(海)大學教育哲學與應用哲學系教授，愛琴海大學應用哲學研究中心主任。Elena Theodoropoulou主要研究領域為應用哲學及其多元型態、教育倫理及其實務型態，哲學的當代邏輯性。她在希臘引進兒童教育哲學之對話與反思、從哲學探討職場倫理等。 |
|
演講主題
|
Another way of making philosophy (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月11日 |
|
演講講者
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou |
|
演講摘要
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou是希臘愛琴(海)大學教育哲學與應用哲學系教授，愛琴海大學應用哲學研究中心主任。Elena Theodoropoulou主要研究領域為應用哲學及其多元型態、教育倫理及其實務型態，哲學的當代邏輯性。她在希臘引進兒童教育哲學之對話與反思、從哲學探討職場倫理等。 |
|
演講主題
|
Another way of making philosophy (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月11日 |
|
演講講者
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou |
|
演講摘要
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou是希臘愛琴(海)大學教育哲學與應用哲學系教授，愛琴海大學應用哲學研究中心主任。Elena Theodoropoulou主要研究領域為應用哲學及其多元型態、教育倫理及其實務型態，哲學的當代邏輯性。她在希臘引進兒童教育哲學之對話與反思、從哲學探討職場倫理等。 |
|
演講主題
|
Another way of making philosophy (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月11日 |
|
演講講者
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou |
|
演講摘要
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou是希臘愛琴(海)大學教育哲學與應用哲學系教授，愛琴海大學應用哲學研究中心主任。Elena Theodoropoulou主要研究領域為應用哲學及其多元型態、教育倫理及其實務型態，哲學的當代邏輯性。她在希臘引進兒童教育哲學之對話與反思、從哲學探討職場倫理等。 |
|
演講主題
|
Another way of making philosophy (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月11日 |
|
演講講者
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou |
|
演講摘要
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou是希臘愛琴(海)大學教育哲學與應用哲學系教授，愛琴海大學應用哲學研究中心主任。Elena Theodoropoulou主要研究領域為應用哲學及其多元型態、教育倫理及其實務型態，哲學的當代邏輯性。她在希臘引進兒童教育哲學之對話與反思、從哲學探討職場倫理等。 |
|
演講主題
|
The "Great Replacement”? (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月05日 |
|
演講講者
|
Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison |
|
演講摘要
|
「大取代」這個詞是法國極右派作家赫努卡謬(Renaud Camus)所提出的，他控訴穆斯林是族群「大取代」的起源，從而帶給法國社會與其「身分」的重大威脅。不久前，紐西蘭發生仇視伊斯蘭攻擊，這起屠殺事件很明顯呼應了赫努卡謬的用詞，可見「大取代」這個命名和影響力已經國際化了。 |
|
演講主題
|
The "Great Replacement”? (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月05日 |
|
演講講者
|
Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison |
|
演講摘要
|
「大取代」這個詞是法國極右派作家赫努卡謬(Renaud Camus)所提出的，他控訴穆斯林是族群「大取代」的起源，從而帶給法國社會與其「身分」的重大威脅。不久前，紐西蘭發生仇視伊斯蘭攻擊，這起屠殺事件很明顯呼應了赫努卡謬的用詞，可見「大取代」這個命名和影響力已經國際化了。 |
|
演講主題
|
The "Great Replacement”? (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月05日 |
|
演講講者
|
Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison |
|
演講摘要
|
「大取代」這個詞是法國極右派作家赫努卡謬(Renaud Camus)所提出的，他控訴穆斯林是族群「大取代」的起源，從而帶給法國社會與其「身分」的重大威脅。不久前，紐西蘭發生仇視伊斯蘭攻擊，這起屠殺事件很明顯呼應了赫努卡謬的用詞，可見「大取代」這個命名和影響力已經國際化了。 |
|
演講主題
|
The "Great Replacement”? (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月05日 |
|
演講講者
|
Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison |
|
演講摘要
|
「大取代」這個詞是法國極右派作家赫努卡謬(Renaud Camus)所提出的，他控訴穆斯林是族群「大取代」的起源，從而帶給法國社會與其「身分」的重大威脅。不久前，紐西蘭發生仇視伊斯蘭攻擊，這起屠殺事件很明顯呼應了赫努卡謬的用詞，可見「大取代」這個命名和影響力已經國際化了。 |
|
演講主題
|
The "Great Replacement”? (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月05日 |
|
演講講者
|
Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison |
|
演講摘要
|
「大取代」這個詞是法國極右派作家赫努卡謬(Renaud Camus)所提出的，他控訴穆斯林是族群「大取代」的起源，從而帶給法國社會與其「身分」的重大威脅。不久前，紐西蘭發生仇視伊斯蘭攻擊，這起屠殺事件很明顯呼應了赫努卡謬的用詞，可見「大取代」這個命名和影響力已經國際化了。 |
|
演講主題
|
The "Great Replacement”? (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月05日 |
|
演講講者
|
Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison |
|
演講摘要
|
「大取代」這個詞是法國極右派作家赫努卡謬(Renaud Camus)所提出的，他控訴穆斯林是族群「大取代」的起源，從而帶給法國社會與其「身分」的重大威脅。不久前，紐西蘭發生仇視伊斯蘭攻擊，這起屠殺事件很明顯呼應了赫努卡謬的用詞，可見「大取代」這個命名和影響力已經國際化了。 |
|
演講主題
|
The "Great Replacement”? (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年06月05日 |
|
演講講者
|
Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison |
|
演講摘要
|
「大取代」這個詞是法國極右派作家赫努卡謬(Renaud Camus)所提出的，他控訴穆斯林是族群「大取代」的起源，從而帶給法國社會與其「身分」的重大威脅。不久前，紐西蘭發生仇視伊斯蘭攻擊，這起屠殺事件很明顯呼應了赫努卡謬的用詞，可見「大取代」這個命名和影響力已經國際化了。 |
|
演講主題
|
Insolvency (1): The avant-garde after the end of modernism and the end of the working class movement in the West |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演講摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演講主題
|
Insolvency (2): The avant-garde after the end of modernism and the end of the working class movement in the West |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演講摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演講主題
|
Insolvency (3): The avant-garde after the end of modernism and the end of the working class movement in the West |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演講摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演講主題
|
Insolvency (4): The avant-garde after the end of modernism and the end of the working class movement in the West |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演講摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演講主題
|
Insolvency (5): The avant-garde after the end of modernism and the end of the working class movement in the West |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演講摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演講主題
|
Trump's Counter-Revolution (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演講摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演講主題
|
Trump's Counter-Revolution (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演講摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演講主題
|
Trump's Counter-Revolution (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演講摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演講主題
|
Trump's Counter-Revolution (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演講摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演講主題
|
Trump's Counter-Revolution (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演講摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演講主題
|
Trump's Counter-Revolution (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演講摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演講主題
|
Trump's Counter-Revolution (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演講摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演講主題
|
關於非洲暴力的感覺思考 Feeling-Thinking On Violence In Africa (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月22日 |
|
演講講者
|
朱元鴻 |
|
演講摘要
|
本講將視相關性以日常的、人類學的、歷史的、社會-政治的、或神話-哲學的角度，感覺思考曾經發生的烏干達內戰與盧安達族群屠殺，以及目前繼續發生於剛果民主共和國東部省份、奈及利亞、南蘇丹、以及南非的暴力衝突。 |
|
演講主題
|
關於非洲暴力的感覺思考 Feeling-Thinking On Violence In Africa (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月22日 |
|
演講講者
|
朱元鴻 |
|
演講摘要
|
本講將視相關性以日常的、人類學的、歷史的、社會-政治的、或神話-哲學的角度，感覺思考曾經發生的烏干達內戰與盧安達族群屠殺，以及目前繼續發生於剛果民主共和國東部省份、奈及利亞、南蘇丹、以及南非的暴力衝突。 |
|
演講主題
|
關於非洲暴力的感覺思考 Feeling-Thinking On Violence In Africa (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月22日 |
|
演講講者
|
朱元鴻 |
|
演講摘要
|
本講將視相關性以日常的、人類學的、歷史的、社會-政治的、或神話-哲學的角度，感覺思考曾經發生的烏干達內戰與盧安達族群屠殺，以及目前繼續發生於剛果民主共和國東部省份、奈及利亞、南蘇丹、以及南非的暴力衝突。 |
|
演講主題
|
關於非洲暴力的感覺思考 Feeling-Thinking On Violence In Africa (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月22日 |
|
演講講者
|
朱元鴻 |
|
演講摘要
|
本講將視相關性以日常的、人類學的、歷史的、社會-政治的、或神話-哲學的角度，感覺思考曾經發生的烏干達內戰與盧安達族群屠殺，以及目前繼續發生於剛果民主共和國東部省份、奈及利亞、南蘇丹、以及南非的暴力衝突。 |
|
演講主題
|
關於非洲暴力的感覺思考 Feeling-Thinking On Violence In Africa (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月22日 |
|
演講講者
|
朱元鴻 |
|
演講摘要
|
本講將視相關性以日常的、人類學的、歷史的、社會-政治的、或神話-哲學的角度，感覺思考曾經發生的烏干達內戰與盧安達族群屠殺，以及目前繼續發生於剛果民主共和國東部省份、奈及利亞、南蘇丹、以及南非的暴力衝突。 |
|
演講主題
|
關於非洲暴力的感覺思考 Feeling-Thinking On Violence In Africa (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月22日 |
|
演講講者
|
朱元鴻 |
|
演講摘要
|
本講將視相關性以日常的、人類學的、歷史的、社會-政治的、或神話-哲學的角度，感覺思考曾經發生的烏干達內戰與盧安達族群屠殺，以及目前繼續發生於剛果民主共和國東部省份、奈及利亞、南蘇丹、以及南非的暴力衝突。 |
|
演講主題
|
關於非洲暴力的感覺思考 Feeling-Thinking On Violence In Africa (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月22日 |
|
演講講者
|
朱元鴻 |
|
演講摘要
|
本講將視相關性以日常的、人類學的、歷史的、社會-政治的、或神話-哲學的角度，感覺思考曾經發生的烏干達內戰與盧安達族群屠殺，以及目前繼續發生於剛果民主共和國東部省份、奈及利亞、南蘇丹、以及南非的暴力衝突。 |
|
演講主題
|
Ritual Mediations and the Postmemory of the Cheju Massacre in Korea (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月10日 |
|
演講講者
|
Seong Nae Kim |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk inquires into questions of violence, memory, silence and memorialization with respect to a formative historical event, the Cheju Massacre or April Third (4.3 Sasam) Incident on Cheju Island in 1948 which was regarded as one of the first outbreaks of violent ideological conflict in the early Cold War. It explores the way in which the imagery of violent deaths in the family and villages during the massacres is ritually mediated through spirit possession and the re-burial rites of dead bodies that have been exhumed from mass graves sixty years after the event. In the ritual communication and public commemorations, the “ghostly” status of the massacre victims is granted new status as “the ancestor” of family and also acquired newly as “the victim” of state violence. This “ritualized hospitality” toward these new collective dead operates in variant forms of re-placing the dead victims across multiple scales of social relations involving families, local villages, the island, and finally, the South Korean state. The massacre victims shift their position from one of “nonplace” to “placed.” It was precisely due to their social alienation and historically liminal status that such nonaligned spirits served as the ideal object of ritual practices in ways that attest to a new paradigm of memory politics in which all dead are equally and permanently venerated. The talk envisages the new paradigm of memory work in the post–Cold War era. |
|
演講主題
|
Ritual Mediations and the Postmemory of the Cheju Massacre in Korea (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月10日 |
|
演講講者
|
Seong Nae Kim |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk inquires into questions of violence, memory, silence and memorialization with respect to a formative historical event, the Cheju Massacre or April Third (4.3 Sasam) Incident on Cheju Island in 1948 which was regarded as one of the first outbreaks of violent ideological conflict in the early Cold War. It explores the way in which the imagery of violent deaths in the family and villages during the massacres is ritually mediated through spirit possession and the re-burial rites of dead bodies that have been exhumed from mass graves sixty years after the event. In the ritual communication and public commemorations, the “ghostly” status of the massacre victims is granted new status as “the ancestor” of family and also acquired newly as “the victim” of state violence. This “ritualized hospitality” toward these new collective dead operates in variant forms of re-placing the dead victims across multiple scales of social relations involving families, local villages, the island, and finally, the South Korean state. The massacre victims shift their position from one of “nonplace” to “placed.” It was precisely due to their social alienation and historically liminal status that such nonaligned spirits served as the ideal object of ritual practices in ways that attest to a new paradigm of memory politics in which all dead are equally and permanently venerated. The talk envisages the new paradigm of memory work in the post–Cold War era. |
|
演講主題
|
Ritual Mediations and the Postmemory of the Cheju Massacre in Korea (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月10日 |
|
演講講者
|
Seong Nae Kim |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk inquires into questions of violence, memory, silence and memorialization with respect to a formative historical event, the Cheju Massacre or April Third (4.3 Sasam) Incident on Cheju Island in 1948 which was regarded as one of the first outbreaks of violent ideological conflict in the early Cold War. It explores the way in which the imagery of violent deaths in the family and villages during the massacres is ritually mediated through spirit possession and the re-burial rites of dead bodies that have been exhumed from mass graves sixty years after the event. In the ritual communication and public commemorations, the “ghostly” status of the massacre victims is granted new status as “the ancestor” of family and also acquired newly as “the victim” of state violence. This “ritualized hospitality” toward these new collective dead operates in variant forms of re-placing the dead victims across multiple scales of social relations involving families, local villages, the island, and finally, the South Korean state. The massacre victims shift their position from one of “nonplace” to “placed.” It was precisely due to their social alienation and historically liminal status that such nonaligned spirits served as the ideal object of ritual practices in ways that attest to a new paradigm of memory politics in which all dead are equally and permanently venerated. The talk envisages the new paradigm of memory work in the post–Cold War era. |
|
演講主題
|
Ritual Mediations and the Postmemory of the Cheju Massacre in Korea (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月10日 |
|
演講講者
|
Seong Nae Kim |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk inquires into questions of violence, memory, silence and memorialization with respect to a formative historical event, the Cheju Massacre or April Third (4.3 Sasam) Incident on Cheju Island in 1948 which was regarded as one of the first outbreaks of violent ideological conflict in the early Cold War. It explores the way in which the imagery of violent deaths in the family and villages during the massacres is ritually mediated through spirit possession and the re-burial rites of dead bodies that have been exhumed from mass graves sixty years after the event. In the ritual communication and public commemorations, the “ghostly” status of the massacre victims is granted new status as “the ancestor” of family and also acquired newly as “the victim” of state violence. This “ritualized hospitality” toward these new collective dead operates in variant forms of re-placing the dead victims across multiple scales of social relations involving families, local villages, the island, and finally, the South Korean state. The massacre victims shift their position from one of “nonplace” to “placed.” It was precisely due to their social alienation and historically liminal status that such nonaligned spirits served as the ideal object of ritual practices in ways that attest to a new paradigm of memory politics in which all dead are equally and permanently venerated. The talk envisages the new paradigm of memory work in the post–Cold War era. |
|
演講主題
|
Ritual Mediations and the Postmemory of the Cheju Massacre in Korea (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月10日 |
|
演講講者
|
Seong Nae Kim |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk inquires into questions of violence, memory, silence and memorialization with respect to a formative historical event, the Cheju Massacre or April Third (4.3 Sasam) Incident on Cheju Island in 1948 which was regarded as one of the first outbreaks of violent ideological conflict in the early Cold War. It explores the way in which the imagery of violent deaths in the family and villages during the massacres is ritually mediated through spirit possession and the re-burial rites of dead bodies that have been exhumed from mass graves sixty years after the event. In the ritual communication and public commemorations, the “ghostly” status of the massacre victims is granted new status as “the ancestor” of family and also acquired newly as “the victim” of state violence. This “ritualized hospitality” toward these new collective dead operates in variant forms of re-placing the dead victims across multiple scales of social relations involving families, local villages, the island, and finally, the South Korean state. The massacre victims shift their position from one of “nonplace” to “placed.” It was precisely due to their social alienation and historically liminal status that such nonaligned spirits served as the ideal object of ritual practices in ways that attest to a new paradigm of memory politics in which all dead are equally and permanently venerated. The talk envisages the new paradigm of memory work in the post–Cold War era. |
|
演講主題
|
Ritual Mediations and the Postmemory of the Cheju Massacre in Korea (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月10日 |
|
演講講者
|
Seong Nae Kim |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk inquires into questions of violence, memory, silence and memorialization with respect to a formative historical event, the Cheju Massacre or April Third (4.3 Sasam) Incident on Cheju Island in 1948 which was regarded as one of the first outbreaks of violent ideological conflict in the early Cold War. It explores the way in which the imagery of violent deaths in the family and villages during the massacres is ritually mediated through spirit possession and the re-burial rites of dead bodies that have been exhumed from mass graves sixty years after the event. In the ritual communication and public commemorations, the “ghostly” status of the massacre victims is granted new status as “the ancestor” of family and also acquired newly as “the victim” of state violence. This “ritualized hospitality” toward these new collective dead operates in variant forms of re-placing the dead victims across multiple scales of social relations involving families, local villages, the island, and finally, the South Korean state. The massacre victims shift their position from one of “nonplace” to “placed.” It was precisely due to their social alienation and historically liminal status that such nonaligned spirits served as the ideal object of ritual practices in ways that attest to a new paradigm of memory politics in which all dead are equally and permanently venerated. The talk envisages the new paradigm of memory work in the post–Cold War era. |
|
演講主題
|
Ritual Mediations and the Postmemory of the Cheju Massacre in Korea (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年05月10日 |
|
演講講者
|
Seong Nae Kim |
|
演講摘要
|
This talk inquires into questions of violence, memory, silence and memorialization with respect to a formative historical event, the Cheju Massacre or April Third (4.3 Sasam) Incident on Cheju Island in 1948 which was regarded as one of the first outbreaks of violent ideological conflict in the early Cold War. It explores the way in which the imagery of violent deaths in the family and villages during the massacres is ritually mediated through spirit possession and the re-burial rites of dead bodies that have been exhumed from mass graves sixty years after the event. In the ritual communication and public commemorations, the “ghostly” status of the massacre victims is granted new status as “the ancestor” of family and also acquired newly as “the victim” of state violence. This “ritualized hospitality” toward these new collective dead operates in variant forms of re-placing the dead victims across multiple scales of social relations involving families, local villages, the island, and finally, the South Korean state. The massacre victims shift their position from one of “nonplace” to “placed.” It was precisely due to their social alienation and historically liminal status that such nonaligned spirits served as the ideal object of ritual practices in ways that attest to a new paradigm of memory politics in which all dead are equally and permanently venerated. The talk envisages the new paradigm of memory work in the post–Cold War era. |
|
演講主題
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演講摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演講主題
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演講摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演講主題
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演講摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演講主題
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演講摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演講主題
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演講摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演講主題
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演講摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演講主題
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演講摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演講主題
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (8) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演講摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演講主題
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (9) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演講摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演講主題
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (10) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演講摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演講主題
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (11) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演講摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演講主題
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (12) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演講講者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演講摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演講主題
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演講講者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演講摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演講主題
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演講講者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演講摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演講主題
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演講講者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演講摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演講主題
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演講講者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演講摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演講主題
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演講講者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演講摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演講主題
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演講講者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演講摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演講主題
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演講講者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演講摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演講主題
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (8) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演講講者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演講摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演講主題
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (9) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演講講者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演講摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演講主題
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (10) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演講講者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演講摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演講主題
|
西谷修的戰爭哲學：戰爭的蛻變 (1)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講摘要
|
講者於本次演講講述現代國家的演變，探討戰爭型態的變化，由主權國家、民族國家、安全國家等等，討論出戰爭發動權、徵兵制、全面戰爭與總動員、核相互保證毀滅、反恐戰爭與非常狀態等等。最後他講述當前反恐戰爭中，恐怖分子的判定與分類，如何造成這些人的非人化、失去人權等等作為人類文明敵人的現象。 |
|
演講主題
|
西谷修的戰爭哲學：戰爭的蛻變 (2)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講摘要
|
講者於本次演講講述現代國家的演變，探討戰爭型態的變化，由主權國家、民族國家、安全國家等等，討論出戰爭發動權、徵兵制、全面戰爭與總動員、核相互保證毀滅、反恐戰爭與非常狀態等等。最後他講述當前反恐戰爭中，恐怖分子的判定與分類，如何造成這些人的非人化、失去人權等等作為人類文明敵人的現象。 |
|
演講主題
|
西谷修的戰爭哲學：戰爭的蛻變 (3)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講摘要
|
講者於本次演講講述現代國家的演變，探討戰爭型態的變化，由主權國家、民族國家、安全國家等等，討論出戰爭發動權、徵兵制、全面戰爭與總動員、核相互保證毀滅、反恐戰爭與非常狀態等等。最後他講述當前反恐戰爭中，恐怖分子的判定與分類，如何造成這些人的非人化、失去人權等等作為人類文明敵人的現象。 |
|
演講主題
|
西谷修的戰爭哲學：戰爭的蛻變 (4)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講摘要
|
講者於本次演講講述現代國家的演變，探討戰爭型態的變化，由主權國家、民族國家、安全國家等等，討論出戰爭發動權、徵兵制、全面戰爭與總動員、核相互保證毀滅、反恐戰爭與非常狀態等等。最後他講述當前反恐戰爭中，恐怖分子的判定與分類，如何造成這些人的非人化、失去人權等等作為人類文明敵人的現象。 |
|
演講主題
|
西谷修的戰爭哲學：戰爭的蛻變 (5)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講摘要
|
講者於本次演講講述現代國家的演變，探討戰爭型態的變化，由主權國家、民族國家、安全國家等等，討論出戰爭發動權、徵兵制、全面戰爭與總動員、核相互保證毀滅、反恐戰爭與非常狀態等等。最後他講述當前反恐戰爭中，恐怖分子的判定與分類，如何造成這些人的非人化、失去人權等等作為人類文明敵人的現象。 |
|
演講主題
|
西谷修的戰爭哲學：戰爭的蛻變 (6)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講摘要
|
講者於本次演講講述現代國家的演變，探討戰爭型態的變化，由主權國家、民族國家、安全國家等等，討論出戰爭發動權、徵兵制、全面戰爭與總動員、核相互保證毀滅、反恐戰爭與非常狀態等等。最後他講述當前反恐戰爭中，恐怖分子的判定與分類，如何造成這些人的非人化、失去人權等等作為人類文明敵人的現象。 |
|
演講主題
|
西谷修的戰爭哲學：戰爭的蛻變 (7)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講摘要
|
講者於本次演講講述現代國家的演變，探討戰爭型態的變化，由主權國家、民族國家、安全國家等等，討論出戰爭發動權、徵兵制、全面戰爭與總動員、核相互保證毀滅、反恐戰爭與非常狀態等等。最後他講述當前反恐戰爭中，恐怖分子的判定與分類，如何造成這些人的非人化、失去人權等等作為人類文明敵人的現象。 |
|
演講主題
|
西谷修的戰爭哲學：戰爭的蛻變 (8)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講摘要
|
講者於本次演講講述現代國家的演變，探討戰爭型態的變化，由主權國家、民族國家、安全國家等等，討論出戰爭發動權、徵兵制、全面戰爭與總動員、核相互保證毀滅、反恐戰爭與非常狀態等等。最後他講述當前反恐戰爭中，恐怖分子的判定與分類，如何造成這些人的非人化、失去人權等等作為人類文明敵人的現象。 |
|
演講主題
|
西谷修的戰爭哲學：戰爭的蛻變 (9)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講摘要
|
講者於本次演講講述現代國家的演變，探討戰爭型態的變化，由主權國家、民族國家、安全國家等等，討論出戰爭發動權、徵兵制、全面戰爭與總動員、核相互保證毀滅、反恐戰爭與非常狀態等等。最後他講述當前反恐戰爭中，恐怖分子的判定與分類，如何造成這些人的非人化、失去人權等等作為人類文明敵人的現象。 |
|
演講主題
|
西谷修的戰爭哲學：戰爭的蛻變 (10)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講摘要
|
講者於本次演講講述現代國家的演變，探討戰爭型態的變化，由主權國家、民族國家、安全國家等等，討論出戰爭發動權、徵兵制、全面戰爭與總動員、核相互保證毀滅、反恐戰爭與非常狀態等等。最後他講述當前反恐戰爭中，恐怖分子的判定與分類，如何造成這些人的非人化、失去人權等等作為人類文明敵人的現象。 |
|
演講主題
|
西谷修的戰爭哲學：戰爭的蛻變 (11)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演講講者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演講摘要
|
講者於本次演講講述現代國家的演變，探討戰爭型態的變化，由主權國家、民族國家、安全國家等等，討論出戰爭發動權、徵兵制、全面戰爭與總動員、核相互保證毀滅、反恐戰爭與非常狀態等等。最後他講述當前反恐戰爭中，恐怖分子的判定與分類，如何造成這些人的非人化、失去人權等等作為人類文明敵人的現象。 |
|
演講主題
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演講摘要
|
泰國成為難民、流離失所者，和移工的遷居地，已有三十年的時間。幾十萬的難民居住在沿著邊界所設立的九處難民營，另外有大約一萬人居住在市區。估計約有400萬移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰國。根據在四個泰緬邊境的省分所做的調查，民眾反應出對於安全議題的高度關注，多數泰國受訪者也認為這些難民與移工對公眾安全帶來危害，並可能帶有傳染病。受訪者也認為，難民與移工會搶了泰國本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近難民營的農民，相較於居住在距離較遠的都市區的受訪者，普遍有對於移工與難民有正向觀感。這些結果將有助於討論以甚麼觀點能夠消除誤解，並且幫助難民與移工融入泰國社會。 |
|
演講主題
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演講摘要
|
泰國成為難民、流離失所者，和移工的遷居地，已有三十年的時間。幾十萬的難民居住在沿著邊界所設立的九處難民營，另外有大約一萬人居住在市區。估計約有400萬移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰國。根據在四個泰緬邊境的省分所做的調查，民眾反應出對於安全議題的高度關注，多數泰國受訪者也認為這些難民與移工對公眾安全帶來危害，並可能帶有傳染病。受訪者也認為，難民與移工會搶了泰國本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近難民營的農民，相較於居住在距離較遠的都市區的受訪者，普遍有對於移工與難民有正向觀感。這些結果將有助於討論以甚麼觀點能夠消除誤解，並且幫助難民與移工融入泰國社會。 |
|
演講主題
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演講摘要
|
泰國成為難民、流離失所者，和移工的遷居地，已有三十年的時間。幾十萬的難民居住在沿著邊界所設立的九處難民營，另外有大約一萬人居住在市區。估計約有400萬移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰國。根據在四個泰緬邊境的省分所做的調查，民眾反應出對於安全議題的高度關注，多數泰國受訪者也認為這些難民與移工對公眾安全帶來危害，並可能帶有傳染病。受訪者也認為，難民與移工會搶了泰國本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近難民營的農民，相較於居住在距離較遠的都市區的受訪者，普遍有對於移工與難民有正向觀感。這些結果將有助於討論以甚麼觀點能夠消除誤解，並且幫助難民與移工融入泰國社會。 |
|
演講主題
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演講摘要
|
泰國成為難民、流離失所者，和移工的遷居地，已有三十年的時間。幾十萬的難民居住在沿著邊界所設立的九處難民營，另外有大約一萬人居住在市區。估計約有400萬移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰國。根據在四個泰緬邊境的省分所做的調查，民眾反應出對於安全議題的高度關注，多數泰國受訪者也認為這些難民與移工對公眾安全帶來危害，並可能帶有傳染病。受訪者也認為，難民與移工會搶了泰國本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近難民營的農民，相較於居住在距離較遠的都市區的受訪者，普遍有對於移工與難民有正向觀感。這些結果將有助於討論以甚麼觀點能夠消除誤解，並且幫助難民與移工融入泰國社會。 |
|
演講主題
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演講摘要
|
泰國成為難民、流離失所者，和移工的遷居地，已有三十年的時間。幾十萬的難民居住在沿著邊界所設立的九處難民營，另外有大約一萬人居住在市區。估計約有400萬移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰國。根據在四個泰緬邊境的省分所做的調查，民眾反應出對於安全議題的高度關注，多數泰國受訪者也認為這些難民與移工對公眾安全帶來危害，並可能帶有傳染病。受訪者也認為，難民與移工會搶了泰國本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近難民營的農民，相較於居住在距離較遠的都市區的受訪者，普遍有對於移工與難民有正向觀感。這些結果將有助於討論以甚麼觀點能夠消除誤解，並且幫助難民與移工融入泰國社會。 |
|
演講主題
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演講摘要
|
泰國成為難民、流離失所者，和移工的遷居地，已有三十年的時間。幾十萬的難民居住在沿著邊界所設立的九處難民營，另外有大約一萬人居住在市區。估計約有400萬移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰國。根據在四個泰緬邊境的省分所做的調查，民眾反應出對於安全議題的高度關注，多數泰國受訪者也認為這些難民與移工對公眾安全帶來危害，並可能帶有傳染病。受訪者也認為，難民與移工會搶了泰國本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近難民營的農民，相較於居住在距離較遠的都市區的受訪者，普遍有對於移工與難民有正向觀感。這些結果將有助於討論以甚麼觀點能夠消除誤解，並且幫助難民與移工融入泰國社會。 |
|
演講主題
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演講摘要
|
泰國成為難民、流離失所者，和移工的遷居地，已有三十年的時間。幾十萬的難民居住在沿著邊界所設立的九處難民營，另外有大約一萬人居住在市區。估計約有400萬移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰國。根據在四個泰緬邊境的省分所做的調查，民眾反應出對於安全議題的高度關注，多數泰國受訪者也認為這些難民與移工對公眾安全帶來危害，並可能帶有傳染病。受訪者也認為，難民與移工會搶了泰國本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近難民營的農民，相較於居住在距離較遠的都市區的受訪者，普遍有對於移工與難民有正向觀感。這些結果將有助於討論以甚麼觀點能夠消除誤解，並且幫助難民與移工融入泰國社會。 |
|
演講主題
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (8) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演講摘要
|
泰國成為難民、流離失所者，和移工的遷居地，已有三十年的時間。幾十萬的難民居住在沿著邊界所設立的九處難民營，另外有大約一萬人居住在市區。估計約有400萬移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰國。根據在四個泰緬邊境的省分所做的調查，民眾反應出對於安全議題的高度關注，多數泰國受訪者也認為這些難民與移工對公眾安全帶來危害，並可能帶有傳染病。受訪者也認為，難民與移工會搶了泰國本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近難民營的農民，相較於居住在距離較遠的都市區的受訪者，普遍有對於移工與難民有正向觀感。這些結果將有助於討論以甚麼觀點能夠消除誤解，並且幫助難民與移工融入泰國社會。 |
|
演講主題
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (9) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演講摘要
|
泰國成為難民、流離失所者，和移工的遷居地，已有三十年的時間。幾十萬的難民居住在沿著邊界所設立的九處難民營，另外有大約一萬人居住在市區。估計約有400萬移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰國。根據在四個泰緬邊境的省分所做的調查，民眾反應出對於安全議題的高度關注，多數泰國受訪者也認為這些難民與移工對公眾安全帶來危害，並可能帶有傳染病。受訪者也認為，難民與移工會搶了泰國本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近難民營的農民，相較於居住在距離較遠的都市區的受訪者，普遍有對於移工與難民有正向觀感。這些結果將有助於討論以甚麼觀點能夠消除誤解，並且幫助難民與移工融入泰國社會。 |
|
演講主題
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (10) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演講摘要
|
泰國成為難民、流離失所者，和移工的遷居地，已有三十年的時間。幾十萬的難民居住在沿著邊界所設立的九處難民營，另外有大約一萬人居住在市區。估計約有400萬移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰國。根據在四個泰緬邊境的省分所做的調查，民眾反應出對於安全議題的高度關注，多數泰國受訪者也認為這些難民與移工對公眾安全帶來危害，並可能帶有傳染病。受訪者也認為，難民與移工會搶了泰國本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近難民營的農民，相較於居住在距離較遠的都市區的受訪者，普遍有對於移工與難民有正向觀感。這些結果將有助於討論以甚麼觀點能夠消除誤解，並且幫助難民與移工融入泰國社會。 |
|
演講主題
|
Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk (1) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan、趙中麒 |
|
演講摘要
|
議題：《窮人。榴槤。麻藥。偷渡客》電影放映與映後座談 Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk 時間：2019/03/27 16:00-18:30 地點：交通大學人社二館106教室 |
|
演講主題
|
Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan、趙中麒 |
|
演講摘要
|
議題：《窮人。榴槤。麻藥。偷渡客》電影放映與映後座談 Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk 時間：2019/03/27 16:00-18:30 地點：交通大學人社二館106教室 |
|
演講主題
|
Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan、趙中麒 |
|
演講摘要
|
議題：《窮人。榴槤。麻藥。偷渡客》電影放映與映後座談 Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk 時間：2019/03/27 16:00-18:30 地點：交通大學人社二館106教室 |
|
演講主題
|
Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan、趙中麒 |
|
演講摘要
|
議題：《窮人。榴槤。麻藥。偷渡客》電影放映與映後座談 Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk 時間：2019/03/27 16:00-18:30 地點：交通大學人社二館106教室 |
|
演講主題
|
Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月27日 |
|
演講講者
|
MaleeSunpuwan、趙中麒 |
|
演講摘要
|
議題：《窮人。榴槤。麻藥。偷渡客》電影放映與映後座談 Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk 時間：2019/03/27 16:00-18:30 地點：交通大學人社二館106教室 |
|
|
演講主題
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (2) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
劉曉原 |
|
演講摘要
|
1949年以後，中華人民共和國政府面臨著歷史遺留的釐清國界的問題，涉及周邊多國。其中，中蒙邊界極具特殊性。首先，這是中國在20世紀最新近的邊界問題，开始於于1945年。其次，這項問題在1949年以後包含了極其複雜的邊界理念，集國際、黨際、民族／族群際内涵於一體。最後，60年代中蘇分裂以後，中蒙邊界地區成為冷戰時期最具戰略意義的邊疆地區之一，不但蘇聯陳重兵於蒙古，内蒙古地區也在「文革」期間成為國內唯一遭到肢解的省區。1962年中蒙邊界條約的簽訂，背景是雙方的黨際關係逐漸惡化、國家關係趨於「正常」，領土觀念大幅調整。中、蒙完成劃界，不僅取決於中、蒙、蘇三國政府在冷戰時期的外交決策，更是近現代中國領土屬性轉型和東亞國際關係現代化發展的必然結果。 |
|
演講主題
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (3) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
劉曉原 |
|
演講摘要
|
1949年以後，中華人民共和國政府面臨著歷史遺留的釐清國界的問題，涉及周邊多國。其中，中蒙邊界極具特殊性。首先，這是中國在20世紀最新近的邊界問題，开始於于1945年。其次，這項問題在1949年以後包含了極其複雜的邊界理念，集國際、黨際、民族／族群際内涵於一體。最後，60年代中蘇分裂以後，中蒙邊界地區成為冷戰時期最具戰略意義的邊疆地區之一，不但蘇聯陳重兵於蒙古，内蒙古地區也在「文革」期間成為國內唯一遭到肢解的省區。1962年中蒙邊界條約的簽訂，背景是雙方的黨際關係逐漸惡化、國家關係趨於「正常」，領土觀念大幅調整。中、蒙完成劃界，不僅取決於中、蒙、蘇三國政府在冷戰時期的外交決策，更是近現代中國領土屬性轉型和東亞國際關係現代化發展的必然結果。 |
|
演講主題
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (4) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
劉曉原 |
|
演講摘要
|
1949年以後，中華人民共和國政府面臨著歷史遺留的釐清國界的問題，涉及周邊多國。其中，中蒙邊界極具特殊性。首先，這是中國在20世紀最新近的邊界問題，开始於于1945年。其次，這項問題在1949年以後包含了極其複雜的邊界理念，集國際、黨際、民族／族群際内涵於一體。最後，60年代中蘇分裂以後，中蒙邊界地區成為冷戰時期最具戰略意義的邊疆地區之一，不但蘇聯陳重兵於蒙古，内蒙古地區也在「文革」期間成為國內唯一遭到肢解的省區。1962年中蒙邊界條約的簽訂，背景是雙方的黨際關係逐漸惡化、國家關係趨於「正常」，領土觀念大幅調整。中、蒙完成劃界，不僅取決於中、蒙、蘇三國政府在冷戰時期的外交決策，更是近現代中國領土屬性轉型和東亞國際關係現代化發展的必然結果。 |
|
演講主題
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (5) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
劉曉原 |
|
演講摘要
|
1949年以後，中華人民共和國政府面臨著歷史遺留的釐清國界的問題，涉及周邊多國。其中，中蒙邊界極具特殊性。首先，這是中國在20世紀最新近的邊界問題，开始於于1945年。其次，這項問題在1949年以後包含了極其複雜的邊界理念，集國際、黨際、民族／族群際内涵於一體。最後，60年代中蘇分裂以後，中蒙邊界地區成為冷戰時期最具戰略意義的邊疆地區之一，不但蘇聯陳重兵於蒙古，内蒙古地區也在「文革」期間成為國內唯一遭到肢解的省區。1962年中蒙邊界條約的簽訂，背景是雙方的黨際關係逐漸惡化、國家關係趨於「正常」，領土觀念大幅調整。中、蒙完成劃界，不僅取決於中、蒙、蘇三國政府在冷戰時期的外交決策，更是近現代中國領土屬性轉型和東亞國際關係現代化發展的必然結果。 |
|
演講主題
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (6) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
劉曉原 |
|
演講摘要
|
1949年以後，中華人民共和國政府面臨著歷史遺留的釐清國界的問題，涉及周邊多國。其中，中蒙邊界極具特殊性。首先，這是中國在20世紀最新近的邊界問題，开始於于1945年。其次，這項問題在1949年以後包含了極其複雜的邊界理念，集國際、黨際、民族／族群際内涵於一體。最後，60年代中蘇分裂以後，中蒙邊界地區成為冷戰時期最具戰略意義的邊疆地區之一，不但蘇聯陳重兵於蒙古，内蒙古地區也在「文革」期間成為國內唯一遭到肢解的省區。1962年中蒙邊界條約的簽訂，背景是雙方的黨際關係逐漸惡化、國家關係趨於「正常」，領土觀念大幅調整。中、蒙完成劃界，不僅取決於中、蒙、蘇三國政府在冷戰時期的外交決策，更是近現代中國領土屬性轉型和東亞國際關係現代化發展的必然結果。 |
|
演講主題
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (7) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
劉曉原 |
|
演講摘要
|
1949年以後，中華人民共和國政府面臨著歷史遺留的釐清國界的問題，涉及周邊多國。其中，中蒙邊界極具特殊性。首先，這是中國在20世紀最新近的邊界問題，开始於于1945年。其次，這項問題在1949年以後包含了極其複雜的邊界理念，集國際、黨際、民族／族群際内涵於一體。最後，60年代中蘇分裂以後，中蒙邊界地區成為冷戰時期最具戰略意義的邊疆地區之一，不但蘇聯陳重兵於蒙古，内蒙古地區也在「文革」期間成為國內唯一遭到肢解的省區。1962年中蒙邊界條約的簽訂，背景是雙方的黨際關係逐漸惡化、國家關係趨於「正常」，領土觀念大幅調整。中、蒙完成劃界，不僅取決於中、蒙、蘇三國政府在冷戰時期的外交決策，更是近現代中國領土屬性轉型和東亞國際關係現代化發展的必然結果。 |
|
演講主題
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (8) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
劉曉原 |
|
演講摘要
|
1949年以後，中華人民共和國政府面臨著歷史遺留的釐清國界的問題，涉及周邊多國。其中，中蒙邊界極具特殊性。首先，這是中國在20世紀最新近的邊界問題，开始於于1945年。其次，這項問題在1949年以後包含了極其複雜的邊界理念，集國際、黨際、民族／族群際内涵於一體。最後，60年代中蘇分裂以後，中蒙邊界地區成為冷戰時期最具戰略意義的邊疆地區之一，不但蘇聯陳重兵於蒙古，内蒙古地區也在「文革」期間成為國內唯一遭到肢解的省區。1962年中蒙邊界條約的簽訂，背景是雙方的黨際關係逐漸惡化、國家關係趨於「正常」，領土觀念大幅調整。中、蒙完成劃界，不僅取決於中、蒙、蘇三國政府在冷戰時期的外交決策，更是近現代中國領土屬性轉型和東亞國際關係現代化發展的必然結果。 |
|
演講主題
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (9) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
劉曉原 |
|
演講摘要
|
1949年以後，中華人民共和國政府面臨著歷史遺留的釐清國界的問題，涉及周邊多國。其中，中蒙邊界極具特殊性。首先，這是中國在20世紀最新近的邊界問題，开始於于1945年。其次，這項問題在1949年以後包含了極其複雜的邊界理念，集國際、黨際、民族／族群際内涵於一體。最後，60年代中蘇分裂以後，中蒙邊界地區成為冷戰時期最具戰略意義的邊疆地區之一，不但蘇聯陳重兵於蒙古，内蒙古地區也在「文革」期間成為國內唯一遭到肢解的省區。1962年中蒙邊界條約的簽訂，背景是雙方的黨際關係逐漸惡化、國家關係趨於「正常」，領土觀念大幅調整。中、蒙完成劃界，不僅取決於中、蒙、蘇三國政府在冷戰時期的外交決策，更是近現代中國領土屬性轉型和東亞國際關係現代化發展的必然結果。 |
|
演講主題
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (10) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
劉曉原 |
|
演講摘要
|
1949年以後，中華人民共和國政府面臨著歷史遺留的釐清國界的問題，涉及周邊多國。其中，中蒙邊界極具特殊性。首先，這是中國在20世紀最新近的邊界問題，开始於于1945年。其次，這項問題在1949年以後包含了極其複雜的邊界理念，集國際、黨際、民族／族群際内涵於一體。最後，60年代中蘇分裂以後，中蒙邊界地區成為冷戰時期最具戰略意義的邊疆地區之一，不但蘇聯陳重兵於蒙古，内蒙古地區也在「文革」期間成為國內唯一遭到肢解的省區。1962年中蒙邊界條約的簽訂，背景是雙方的黨際關係逐漸惡化、國家關係趨於「正常」，領土觀念大幅調整。中、蒙完成劃界，不僅取決於中、蒙、蘇三國政府在冷戰時期的外交決策，更是近現代中國領土屬性轉型和東亞國際關係現代化發展的必然結果。 |
|
演講主題
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (11) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
劉曉原 |
|
演講摘要
|
1949年以後，中華人民共和國政府面臨著歷史遺留的釐清國界的問題，涉及周邊多國。其中，中蒙邊界極具特殊性。首先，這是中國在20世紀最新近的邊界問題，开始於于1945年。其次，這項問題在1949年以後包含了極其複雜的邊界理念，集國際、黨際、民族／族群際内涵於一體。最後，60年代中蘇分裂以後，中蒙邊界地區成為冷戰時期最具戰略意義的邊疆地區之一，不但蘇聯陳重兵於蒙古，内蒙古地區也在「文革」期間成為國內唯一遭到肢解的省區。1962年中蒙邊界條約的簽訂，背景是雙方的黨際關係逐漸惡化、國家關係趨於「正常」，領土觀念大幅調整。中、蒙完成劃界，不僅取決於中、蒙、蘇三國政府在冷戰時期的外交決策，更是近現代中國領土屬性轉型和東亞國際關係現代化發展的必然結果。 |
|
演講主題
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (12) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
劉曉原 |
|
演講摘要
|
1949年以後，中華人民共和國政府面臨著歷史遺留的釐清國界的問題，涉及周邊多國。其中，中蒙邊界極具特殊性。首先，這是中國在20世紀最新近的邊界問題，开始於于1945年。其次，這項問題在1949年以後包含了極其複雜的邊界理念，集國際、黨際、民族／族群際内涵於一體。最後，60年代中蘇分裂以後，中蒙邊界地區成為冷戰時期最具戰略意義的邊疆地區之一，不但蘇聯陳重兵於蒙古，内蒙古地區也在「文革」期間成為國內唯一遭到肢解的省區。1962年中蒙邊界條約的簽訂，背景是雙方的黨際關係逐漸惡化、國家關係趨於「正常」，領土觀念大幅調整。中、蒙完成劃界，不僅取決於中、蒙、蘇三國政府在冷戰時期的外交決策，更是近現代中國領土屬性轉型和東亞國際關係現代化發展的必然結果。 |
|
演講主題
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (13) |
|
演講日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演講講者
|
劉曉原 |
|
演講摘要
|
1949年以後，中華人民共和國政府面臨著歷史遺留的釐清國界的問題，涉及周邊多國。其中，中蒙邊界極具特殊性。首先，這是中國在20世紀最新近的邊界問題，开始於于1945年。其次，這項問題在1949年以後包含了極其複雜的邊界理念，集國際、黨際、民族／族群際内涵於一體。最後，60年代中蘇分裂以後，中蒙邊界地區成為冷戰時期最具戰略意義的邊疆地區之一，不但蘇聯陳重兵於蒙古，内蒙古地區也在「文革」期間成為國內唯一遭到肢解的省區。1962年中蒙邊界條約的簽訂，背景是雙方的黨際關係逐漸惡化、國家關係趨於「正常」，領土觀念大幅調整。中、蒙完成劃界，不僅取決於中、蒙、蘇三國政府在冷戰時期的外交決策，更是近現代中國領土屬性轉型和東亞國際關係現代化發展的必然結果。 |
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|