浏览人次:
12439
相关演讲
|
演讲主题
|
作者来说书｜贺照田《革命-后革命：当代中国历史、思想、文化省思》线上座谈回顾 |
|
演讲日期
|
2020年6月12日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
贺照田 |
|
演讲摘要
|
贺照田老师，主要研究范围在中国十八世纪中叶以降政治史、思想史和中国现当代文学。 在他的《革命—后革命：当代中国历史、思想、文化省思》一书中，提供认识中国崛起的不同视角，并重新认识当代中国「革命—后革命」的历史进程。 因为疫情的关系，本场新书讲座采线上会议的方式进行。由交大刘纪蕙老师主持，并邀请王智明老师、林淑芬老师与作者贺照田老师对谈。本场讲座达100多位读者参与，是在疫情期间，难能可贵横跨两岸的成功线上座谈。 今次释出的片段为讲座过程的节录，供各位读者回顾四位老师的精彩对谈。 而贺照田老师更完整的论述与思想，也敬请参考他的新书：《革命—后革命：当代中国历史、思想、文化省思》 博客来：https://reurl.cc/oLAkyg 三民：https://reurl.cc/O1nZ5r 诚品：https://reurl.cc/oLAkYV 学生书局：https://reurl.cc/5lzjbR 主办单位：文化研究国际中心 International Center for Cultural Studies - UST 中央研究院 Academia Sinica 交通大学社会与文化研究所 SRCS 台湾社会研究学会 Association for Taiwan Social Studies |
|
演讲主题
|
青春的祝福 《蜗牛在荆棘上——路翎及其作品研究》新书座谈会 |
|
演讲日期
|
2020年5月26日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
宋玉雯、顾玉玲 |
|
演讲摘要
|
青春的祝福 《蜗牛在荆棘上——路翎及其作品研究》新书座谈会 时间：2020年5月26日(二) 8:00-10:00 地点：交通大学综合一馆A401教室 路翎（1923-1994）是四十年代中国现代文学的耀眼晨星，偏好描写流浪汉－工人和底层人物的复杂心灵，刻划知识青年在历史变局中的追寻和惶惑。1955年因「胡风反革命集团」案系狱，身心受挫，被迫辍笔逾四分之一世纪，晚年的文学炭火，重燃冷寂中难得的热与光。诚挚邀请您同来阅读路翎的创作故事，探索路翎「落后书写」的洞见和契机。 主持人：彭明伟 （交通大学社会与文化研究所副教授） 与谈：宋玉雯（国立中央大学中国文学系助理教授）、顾玉玲（台北艺术大学出版中心主任） 主办单位：国立交通大学文化研究国际中心、亚际文化研究国际硕士学位学程（台湾联合大学系统）、交通大学社会与文化研究所、交通大学出版社、交通大学通识中心 |
|
演讲主题
|
液态正义：以类造人的意识形态与治理术 |
|
演讲日期
|
2020年5月5日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
吴哲良 |
|
演讲摘要
|
讲题: 液态正义：以类造人的意识形态与治理术Liquid Justice: Ideology and Governmentality of Making up People 译书发表：《亚斯伯格的孩子们：自闭症在纳粹维也纳的起源》On Asperger's Children: The Origins of Autism in Nazi Vienna (Chinese edition) 时间：2020年5月5日（二）18:30-21:30 地点：交通大学人社二馆106A室（106A HA Building 2 ,NCTU） 自闭症与亚斯伯格症候群的研究先驱——汉斯・亚斯伯格（Hans Asperger），长久以来被视为捍卫身心障碍儿童的仁慈医生，然而，近年来有不少历史学者透过生涯历程、着作与档案史料的追溯，重新检视亚斯伯格医生与纳粹优生学及医疗体制的共谋联系。《亚斯伯格的孩子们：自闭症在纳粹维也纳的起源》一书，企图揭露心理疾病的命名与诊断、医疗制度运作、以及政治意识形态之间的潜在关连。「亚斯伯格」此一人名或是诊断名称的备受争议之处，正是引发我们反省当今对于界定「非常态」（abnormality）的阈限或谱系的历史破口。 主持：朱元鸿Yuan-Horng Chu（交大社会与文化研究所教授） 讲者：吴哲良Che-Liang Wu（清华大学书院导师及通识教育中心兼任助理教授） 对谈：黄明慧Ming-Hui Huang（英国谢菲尔德大学俄罗斯与斯拉夫研究所博士） *中文演讲（英语同步口译） 主办单位：国立交通大学文化研究国际中心、亚际文化研究国际硕士学位学程（台湾联合大学系统）、交通大学社会与文化研究所、交通大学出版社 |
|
演讲主题
|
The Role of Ethnography in Studying Taiwan's Migrant Workers and the Broker System |
|
演讲日期
|
2020年4月1日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Sudarat Musikawong |
|
演讲摘要
|
Date：2020/04/01 Time：14:00-17:00 Venue：106A HA Building 2 ,NCTU Lecture Description： The lecture is an informal discussion focused on methodology, primarily about the role of ethnography in the project "Broker & Employer Practices and Working Conditions Foreign Migrant Workers in Taiwan" (Qualitative Study- June 2019-November 2020). This project is still ongoing, in collaboration with faculty and researchers at Mahidol University/ IPSR, NCTU/ICCS and National Dongwa University, Department of Sociology. Taiwan’s formal international labor migration began in March 1989 when the government pursued fourteen large infrastructural projects like Highway 3, the MRT, which utilize the broker system to hire a majority of Thai workers, with Filipinos and Indonesians. That year Taiwan signed the Taiwan Beneficial Relations Act (1989), designating favorable import quotas for the Philippines. By 1992, the process of hiring foreign migrant workers in construction, industry, domestic caretaking, and fisheries sectors became more formalized (Chen, 2006). While after 2005, such infrastructural construction projects slowed, the demand for labor in personal care services, SME factories and both long-and short haul fisheries sectors increased. While some receiving countries like Thailand and South Korea have moved toward Government to Government direct hiring systems through MOU processes and government run migrant worker services, Taiwan continues to utilize the private broker industry (recently amended direct employer hiring), waranting more careful study of broker and employer practices. These developments in Taiwan are rather public and can be followed in the news, but how do we study brokering as social practices. The talk will consider methodological challenges of accessing interviews with broker companies, developing trust with manpower agencies, employers, and migrant worker populations, as well as the demands of NGO/Union solidarity practices in research. |
|
演讲主题
|
On the Corporate State |
|
演讲日期
|
2020年1月8日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Bruce Kapferer、Marina Gold |
|
演讲摘要
|
Date：2020.01.08 (Wed.) Time：14:00-17:00 Venue：国立交通大学人社二馆 106 / R106 HA Building 2, NCTU (全程英翻中同步口译) Abstract: A synopsis of an upcoming book, On the Corporate State, jointly authored by Kapferer, Gold and Donald Nonini. 本次讲座主题源自讲者Kapferer、Gold，以及 Donald Nonini 合着的新书《On the Corporate State》 ，其主要概念以「平等」议题为核心。事实上，「平等」的定义范围多元，由哲学论述涵盖至日常实践的基础领域。 同时，「平等主义」与「进步」也有同质的意思，因为其明确的主张和意识形态的合法化推动了经济和文化变迁、政治批判，以及社会运动。这次演讲主要探讨平等主义计划中与当代社会危机有关的理论目标，特别是民粹主义运动，以及图像在仪式传统、及科技时代中再仪式化现代性的潜力。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Egalitarianism and Inequality: A Theoretical & Cross-Cultural Dialogue 「平等主义与不平等事实: 一个理论和泛文化的探讨 」研讨会 |
|
演讲日期
|
2020年1月7日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Allen Chun陈奕麟、Bruce Kapferer、Alain Brossat、Derek Sheridan谢力登、Knut Rio、Joyce Liu 刘纪蕙、Ya-Chung Chuang庄雅仲、Bjørn Bertelsen、Yuan-Horng Chu朱元鸿、Kai-Shyh Lin 林开世、Kai-Shyh Lin 林开世、Shu-Fen Lin林淑芬 |
|
演讲摘要
|
日期：2020年1月7日(二) 时间：9:10-17:45 地点：国立交通大学人社三馆 201 / R201 HA Building 3, NCTU *全程英翻中同步口译 Simultaneous interpretation (English-Chinese) 其他影片：https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzLn5TDx5vGdH7STGmLsTyzYiObJm37it |
|
演讲主题
|
香港论坛：法治、警权、人民 |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年12月21日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
彭丽君、郑肇祺、陈锦荣、林志洁、叶荫聪、曾仲坚、容邵武、刘纪蕙、陈奕麟、朱元鸿、林淑芬 |
|
演讲摘要
|
自今年（2019）3月15日起，至6月9日大规模爆发的反对《逃犯条例》修订草案社会运动，至今已经八个月，香港示威堵路活动仍然不绝。虽然《逃犯条例》至今已暂时撤回，但在催泪瓦斯的烟硝不断，人民对法治与警权的信任基石已然动摇。 详细简介：https://iccs.nctu.edu.tw/zh/activity.php?USN=550 其他影片：https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzLn5TDx5vGclg-pq3pG9kONDmpGicpw_ |
|
演讲主题
|
Political Transition in Myanmar and the Conflict in Rakhine State Interlinked? |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年12月18日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Kristina Kironska |
|
演讲摘要
|
In this lecture, you will learn about ethnic groups in Asia that are stateless and what that means for them in their daily life. The main focus will, however, be on the Rohingya who have since 2012 left Myanmar's Rakhine State en masse. Who are they and why did they have to flee? How is the conflict in Rakhine State connected to the recent transition process in Myanmar? |
|
演讲主题
|
Global Shanghai through Trans-Asian Film & Literature |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年12月16日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Manas Ghosh |
|
演讲摘要
|
Shanghai in the nineteenth century and in the first half of the twentieth century grew as the Paris of Asia. It had a long experience of multiple modernities in the form of colonialism, expansion of overseas trade, industrialisation, underworld, imperial warfare and people’s resistance to the foreign invasion. Shanghai appeared as one of the most cosmopolitan global-cosmopolitan global city. It has become the principal axis of the articulation of post-May 4thChinese modernity. The city has a special historical significance in the context of Indo-China cultural interaction. Rabindranath Tagore visitedShanghai in 1924 and 1928. Shanghai modernity attracted him. In memory of Tagore's visit to China, a bust of Tagore has been installed in a Shanghai locality where he stayed while visiting Shanghai. The paper would discuss a minor novel that portrayed Shanghai. A noted Bengali writer Bibhuti Bhusan Bandyopadhyay in the 1940s wrote a novel called MaranerDonka Baje (The Death Drum Beats)for the Bengali young adults. The novel portrayed Shanghai as two protagonists of the novel ended up their voyage in the city in the time of Sino-Japanese war. The city, as described by Bandyopadhyay had become a space that corresponded with the desire for cosmopolitan modernity, belonged to the heart of the two young Bengali educated young men. In spite of their stay in the city was infested with war-time emergency and crisis, diseased by petty crimes, prostitution and poverty, Shanghai provided them with a kind of emancipatory air, globality and youthfulness. The presentation will discuss the Shanghai Leftwing cinema of the 1930s and the Bengali novel by Bandyapadhyay side by side towards an inter-Asian understanding of the global city Shanghai. |
|
演讲主题
|
THE DEMISE OF (STATE) MULTILATERALISM IN THE MULTIPOLAR WORLD; WHY? (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Goran Fejic |
|
演讲摘要
|
Why is multilateralism (the idea that international relations should be shaped by commonly agreed rules and implemented for the benefit of all) undergoing a crisis today, precisely at the time when the world seems to become genuinely multi-polar? |
|
演讲主题
|
THE DEMISE OF (STATE) MULTILATERALISM IN THE MULTIPOLAR WORLD; WHY? (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Goran Fejic |
|
演讲摘要
|
Why is multilateralism (the idea that international relations should be shaped by commonly agreed rules and implemented for the benefit of all) undergoing a crisis today, precisely at the time when the world seems to become genuinely multi-polar? |
|
演讲主题
|
THE DEMISE OF (STATE) MULTILATERALISM IN THE MULTIPOLAR WORLD; WHY? (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Goran Fejic |
|
演讲摘要
|
Why is multilateralism (the idea that international relations should be shaped by commonly agreed rules and implemented for the benefit of all) undergoing a crisis today, precisely at the time when the world seems to become genuinely multi-polar? |
|
演讲主题
|
THE DEMISE OF (STATE) MULTILATERALISM IN THE MULTIPOLAR WORLD; WHY? (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Goran Fejic |
|
演讲摘要
|
Why is multilateralism (the idea that international relations should be shaped by commonly agreed rules and implemented for the benefit of all) undergoing a crisis today, precisely at the time when the world seems to become genuinely multi-polar? |
|
演讲主题
|
THE DEMISE OF (STATE) MULTILATERALISM IN THE MULTIPOLAR WORLD; WHY? (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Goran Fejic |
|
演讲摘要
|
Why is multilateralism (the idea that international relations should be shaped by commonly agreed rules and implemented for the benefit of all) undergoing a crisis today, precisely at the time when the world seems to become genuinely multi-polar? |
|
演讲主题
|
THE DEMISE OF (STATE) MULTILATERALISM IN THE MULTIPOLAR WORLD; WHY? (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Goran Fejic |
|
演讲摘要
|
Why is multilateralism (the idea that international relations should be shaped by commonly agreed rules and implemented for the benefit of all) undergoing a crisis today, precisely at the time when the world seems to become genuinely multi-polar? |
|
演讲主题
|
THE DEMISE OF (STATE) MULTILATERALISM IN THE MULTIPOLAR WORLD; WHY? (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Goran Fejic |
|
演讲摘要
|
Why is multilateralism (the idea that international relations should be shaped by commonly agreed rules and implemented for the benefit of all) undergoing a crisis today, precisely at the time when the world seems to become genuinely multi-polar? |
|
演讲主题
|
White Slaves/Black Revolutionaries—Who Has the Right to Have Rights? Who Has the Right to Resist? Explorations of the US and the Haitian Revolutions (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月20日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Coterminous with US press coverage of US white “enslavement,” during the Barbary Wars, news of the slave uprisings in the French sugar colony of Saint Domingue hit the US popular press. Were the rebellious slaves in one of the most sadistic plantation slave economies justified in asserting their right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” or did they embody the worst threat to democratic rule—savage black mobs raping and murdering? This talk will explore the evolution of the Haitian Revolution and the radical press’s (in both France and the United States) response to Afro-Caribbean’s assertion to their rights to freedom, political agency and independence from French colonial rule. |
|
演讲主题
|
White Slaves/Black Revolutionaries—Who Has the Right to Have Rights? Who Has the Right to Resist? Explorations of the US and the Haitian Revolutions (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月20日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Coterminous with US press coverage of US white “enslavement,” during the Barbary Wars, news of the slave uprisings in the French sugar colony of Saint Domingue hit the US popular press. Were the rebellious slaves in one of the most sadistic plantation slave economies justified in asserting their right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” or did they embody the worst threat to democratic rule—savage black mobs raping and murdering? This talk will explore the evolution of the Haitian Revolution and the radical press’s (in both France and the United States) response to Afro-Caribbean’s assertion to their rights to freedom, political agency and independence from French colonial rule. |
|
演讲主题
|
White Slaves/Black Revolutionaries—Who Has the Right to Have Rights? Who Has the Right to Resist? Explorations of the US and the Haitian Revolutions (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月20日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Coterminous with US press coverage of US white “enslavement,” during the Barbary Wars, news of the slave uprisings in the French sugar colony of Saint Domingue hit the US popular press. Were the rebellious slaves in one of the most sadistic plantation slave economies justified in asserting their right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” or did they embody the worst threat to democratic rule—savage black mobs raping and murdering? This talk will explore the evolution of the Haitian Revolution and the radical press’s (in both France and the United States) response to Afro-Caribbean’s assertion to their rights to freedom, political agency and independence from French colonial rule. |
|
演讲主题
|
White Slaves/Black Revolutionaries—Who Has the Right to Have Rights? Who Has the Right to Resist? Explorations of the US and the Haitian Revolutions (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月20日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Coterminous with US press coverage of US white “enslavement,” during the Barbary Wars, news of the slave uprisings in the French sugar colony of Saint Domingue hit the US popular press. Were the rebellious slaves in one of the most sadistic plantation slave economies justified in asserting their right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” or did they embody the worst threat to democratic rule—savage black mobs raping and murdering? This talk will explore the evolution of the Haitian Revolution and the radical press’s (in both France and the United States) response to Afro-Caribbean’s assertion to their rights to freedom, political agency and independence from French colonial rule. |
|
演讲主题
|
White Slaves/Black Revolutionaries—Who Has the Right to Have Rights? Who Has the Right to Resist? Explorations of the US and the Haitian Revolutions (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月20日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Coterminous with US press coverage of US white “enslavement,” during the Barbary Wars, news of the slave uprisings in the French sugar colony of Saint Domingue hit the US popular press. Were the rebellious slaves in one of the most sadistic plantation slave economies justified in asserting their right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” or did they embody the worst threat to democratic rule—savage black mobs raping and murdering? This talk will explore the evolution of the Haitian Revolution and the radical press’s (in both France and the United States) response to Afro-Caribbean’s assertion to their rights to freedom, political agency and independence from French colonial rule. |
|
演讲主题
|
White Slaves/Black Revolutionaries—Who Has the Right to Have Rights? Who Has the Right to Resist? Explorations of the US and the Haitian Revolutions (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月20日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Coterminous with US press coverage of US white “enslavement,” during the Barbary Wars, news of the slave uprisings in the French sugar colony of Saint Domingue hit the US popular press. Were the rebellious slaves in one of the most sadistic plantation slave economies justified in asserting their right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” or did they embody the worst threat to democratic rule—savage black mobs raping and murdering? This talk will explore the evolution of the Haitian Revolution and the radical press’s (in both France and the United States) response to Afro-Caribbean’s assertion to their rights to freedom, political agency and independence from French colonial rule. |
|
演讲主题
|
White Slaves/Black Revolutionaries—Who Has the Right to Have Rights? Who Has the Right to Resist? Explorations of the US and the Haitian Revolutions (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月20日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Coterminous with US press coverage of US white “enslavement,” during the Barbary Wars, news of the slave uprisings in the French sugar colony of Saint Domingue hit the US popular press. Were the rebellious slaves in one of the most sadistic plantation slave economies justified in asserting their right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” or did they embody the worst threat to democratic rule—savage black mobs raping and murdering? This talk will explore the evolution of the Haitian Revolution and the radical press’s (in both France and the United States) response to Afro-Caribbean’s assertion to their rights to freedom, political agency and independence from French colonial rule. |
|
演讲主题
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演讲主题
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演讲主题
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演讲主题
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演讲主题
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演讲主题
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演讲主题
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演讲主题
|
Race, Rights and Revolution—Democratic Enigmas, Relentless Struggles and the Modern Republic: A History (8) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月18日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
Political democracy, republican governance and a commitment to human rights took form during one of the most radical periods in human history—the Age of Revolution, a time of chaos and transformation, a moment when the political world seemed remade and the promise of freedom unlimited. Today millions of stateless people roam the world from Miramar to Afghanistan, from Palestine and Syria to the Sudan and Central America. The UN Declaration of Human Rights has become a hollow promise, the cry “Never Again” a cruel mockery. How were the Age of Revolution’s brave promises of freedom and democracy, liberty and equality so brutally betrayed? |
|
演讲主题
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演讲主题
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演讲主题
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演讲主题
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演讲主题
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演讲主题
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演讲主题
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演讲主题
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (8) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演讲主题
|
The Mulatta—Desire, Danger and Gendered: Transgression in the Age of Revolution (9) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Carroll Smith-Rosenberg |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk will focus on the mulatta as the literal—and metaphoric—fusion of sameness and difference, a figure who fundamentally destabilized the eighteenth-century’s racialized and sexualized social and political order. This talk will examine legal and political discourses about miscegenation in the Francophone and Anglophone Caribbean focusing on the writings of Edward Long, Bryan Edwards and St. Moreau, as well as John Stedman’s book, Stedman’s Surinam: Life in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Society, and a 1820 novel by a US feminist, Leonora Sansay, titled Zelica, the Creole. |
|
演讲主题
|
Overcoming individual on success based art practices (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月11日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Reinaart Vanhoe |
|
演讲摘要
|
In the coming years, I would like to formulate a biotope of what I want to name a ‘caring/imaginative’ (art) practice’. How to understand art for a citizen-scene opposed to art for an art-scene, or culture-scene of a certain educational class. This formulation will, probably, be based on a mix of certain practices in South East Asia. Important for such a practice is how to speak together, how to understand its ecology and how to understand different perspectives of how people enter interactions. There is a need for formulations how these art-practices look like to give confidence and comfort to artists searching for new articulations. It serves to inspire a younger generation growing up with something named ‘global art’. What comes along with collaborations, how to understand the effort, where to locate critique, what is materialisation, where is the audience, who is the audience. |
|
演讲主题
|
Overcoming individual on success based art practices (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月11日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Reinaart Vanhoe |
|
演讲摘要
|
In the coming years, I would like to formulate a biotope of what I want to name a ‘caring/imaginative’ (art) practice’. How to understand art for a citizen-scene opposed to art for an art-scene, or culture-scene of a certain educational class. This formulation will, probably, be based on a mix of certain practices in South East Asia. Important for such a practice is how to speak together, how to understand its ecology and how to understand different perspectives of how people enter interactions. There is a need for formulations how these art-practices look like to give confidence and comfort to artists searching for new articulations. It serves to inspire a younger generation growing up with something named ‘global art’. What comes along with collaborations, how to understand the effort, where to locate critique, what is materialisation, where is the audience, who is the audience. |
|
演讲主题
|
Overcoming individual on success based art practices (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月11日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Reinaart Vanhoe |
|
演讲摘要
|
In the coming years, I would like to formulate a biotope of what I want to name a ‘caring/imaginative’ (art) practice’. How to understand art for a citizen-scene opposed to art for an art-scene, or culture-scene of a certain educational class. This formulation will, probably, be based on a mix of certain practices in South East Asia. Important for such a practice is how to speak together, how to understand its ecology and how to understand different perspectives of how people enter interactions. There is a need for formulations how these art-practices look like to give confidence and comfort to artists searching for new articulations. It serves to inspire a younger generation growing up with something named ‘global art’. What comes along with collaborations, how to understand the effort, where to locate critique, what is materialisation, where is the audience, who is the audience. |
|
演讲主题
|
Overcoming individual on success based art practices (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月11日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Reinaart Vanhoe |
|
演讲摘要
|
In the coming years, I would like to formulate a biotope of what I want to name a ‘caring/imaginative’ (art) practice’. How to understand art for a citizen-scene opposed to art for an art-scene, or culture-scene of a certain educational class. This formulation will, probably, be based on a mix of certain practices in South East Asia. Important for such a practice is how to speak together, how to understand its ecology and how to understand different perspectives of how people enter interactions. There is a need for formulations how these art-practices look like to give confidence and comfort to artists searching for new articulations. It serves to inspire a younger generation growing up with something named ‘global art’. What comes along with collaborations, how to understand the effort, where to locate critique, what is materialisation, where is the audience, who is the audience. |
|
演讲主题
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲主题
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲主题
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲主题
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲主题
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲主题
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲主题
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲主题
|
What Art Can Do in the XXIst Century? (8) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年11月04日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲摘要
|
Topic: Technical Tendencies, Technical Facts and Technodiversity Speaker: Bernard Stiegler Topic: The Paradox of Intelligence Speaker: Yuk Hui (许煜) |
|
演讲主题
|
Is same-sex marriage in Taiwan (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月30日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Alain Naze, Yung-Hao Liu |
|
演讲摘要
|
In France, the carrying of same-sex marriage has often been pictured as a progress for gays and lesbians, some people even saying that this legal advance promoting equality would be an extension of the so-called movements for « sexual freedom » in the 1970' – or even their completion. However, a comparative analysis of these two periods (the 1970' and the present) gives prominence strong disparities in terms of demands addressed by gays and lesbians and one might consider that a radical reversal of perspective has taken place in the meantime: some sort of a care for « respectability » seems to have come to light, a complete breach, in the French context, with what the gay philosopher Guy Hocquenghem would have called, in the 1970', a « rogue » (delinquent) homosexuality. Could some specificities of the local situation in Taiwan make that maybe same-sex marriage would be an exception to such a « normalization » of the gays and lesbians? |
|
演讲主题
|
Is same-sex marriage in Taiwan (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月30日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Alain Naze, Yung-Hao Liu |
|
演讲摘要
|
In France, the carrying of same-sex marriage has often been pictured as a progress for gays and lesbians, some people even saying that this legal advance promoting equality would be an extension of the so-called movements for « sexual freedom » in the 1970' – or even their completion. However, a comparative analysis of these two periods (the 1970' and the present) gives prominence strong disparities in terms of demands addressed by gays and lesbians and one might consider that a radical reversal of perspective has taken place in the meantime: some sort of a care for « respectability » seems to have come to light, a complete breach, in the French context, with what the gay philosopher Guy Hocquenghem would have called, in the 1970', a « rogue » (delinquent) homosexuality. Could some specificities of the local situation in Taiwan make that maybe same-sex marriage would be an exception to such a « normalization » of the gays and lesbians? |
|
演讲主题
|
Is same-sex marriage in Taiwan (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月30日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Alain Naze, Yung-Hao Liu |
|
演讲摘要
|
In France, the carrying of same-sex marriage has often been pictured as a progress for gays and lesbians, some people even saying that this legal advance promoting equality would be an extension of the so-called movements for « sexual freedom » in the 1970' – or even their completion. However, a comparative analysis of these two periods (the 1970' and the present) gives prominence strong disparities in terms of demands addressed by gays and lesbians and one might consider that a radical reversal of perspective has taken place in the meantime: some sort of a care for « respectability » seems to have come to light, a complete breach, in the French context, with what the gay philosopher Guy Hocquenghem would have called, in the 1970', a « rogue » (delinquent) homosexuality. Could some specificities of the local situation in Taiwan make that maybe same-sex marriage would be an exception to such a « normalization » of the gays and lesbians? |
|
演讲主题
|
Is same-sex marriage in Taiwan (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月30日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Alain Naze, Yung-Hao Liu |
|
演讲摘要
|
In France, the carrying of same-sex marriage has often been pictured as a progress for gays and lesbians, some people even saying that this legal advance promoting equality would be an extension of the so-called movements for « sexual freedom » in the 1970' – or even their completion. However, a comparative analysis of these two periods (the 1970' and the present) gives prominence strong disparities in terms of demands addressed by gays and lesbians and one might consider that a radical reversal of perspective has taken place in the meantime: some sort of a care for « respectability » seems to have come to light, a complete breach, in the French context, with what the gay philosopher Guy Hocquenghem would have called, in the 1970', a « rogue » (delinquent) homosexuality. Could some specificities of the local situation in Taiwan make that maybe same-sex marriage would be an exception to such a « normalization » of the gays and lesbians? |
|
演讲主题
|
Is same-sex marriage in Taiwan (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月30日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Alain Naze, Yung-Hao Liu |
|
演讲摘要
|
In France, the carrying of same-sex marriage has often been pictured as a progress for gays and lesbians, some people even saying that this legal advance promoting equality would be an extension of the so-called movements for « sexual freedom » in the 1970' – or even their completion. However, a comparative analysis of these two periods (the 1970' and the present) gives prominence strong disparities in terms of demands addressed by gays and lesbians and one might consider that a radical reversal of perspective has taken place in the meantime: some sort of a care for « respectability » seems to have come to light, a complete breach, in the French context, with what the gay philosopher Guy Hocquenghem would have called, in the 1970', a « rogue » (delinquent) homosexuality. Could some specificities of the local situation in Taiwan make that maybe same-sex marriage would be an exception to such a « normalization » of the gays and lesbians? |
|
演讲主题
|
Is same-sex marriage in Taiwan (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月30日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Alain Naze, Yung-Hao Liu |
|
演讲摘要
|
In France, the carrying of same-sex marriage has often been pictured as a progress for gays and lesbians, some people even saying that this legal advance promoting equality would be an extension of the so-called movements for « sexual freedom » in the 1970' – or even their completion. However, a comparative analysis of these two periods (the 1970' and the present) gives prominence strong disparities in terms of demands addressed by gays and lesbians and one might consider that a radical reversal of perspective has taken place in the meantime: some sort of a care for « respectability » seems to have come to light, a complete breach, in the French context, with what the gay philosopher Guy Hocquenghem would have called, in the 1970', a « rogue » (delinquent) homosexuality. Could some specificities of the local situation in Taiwan make that maybe same-sex marriage would be an exception to such a « normalization » of the gays and lesbians? |
|
演讲主题
|
Europe and Contemporary Migrations (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Rada Iveković |
|
演讲摘要
|
Europe is no exception to the contemporary closure of borders to people from the global south and east, but it is a particularly insidious example of what is going on practically world-wide in the 21st century and within the new world-configuration of powers. Migrations as an ancient human way of being, but at this time as an epochal and global issue, now define the 21st century. In a globalized world, migrations too should be apprehended globally and as a trans-national phenomenon. In the public lecture, as well as in my mini course at the International Institute for Cultural Studies (ICCS/IICS) of National Chiao Tung University, I shall raise some philosophical questions regarding the functioning of exception(s), immunisation and blind-spots within a given political context, and some political questions regarding the responsibility of Europe in this state of affairs. Postfascism and the status of tolerance in capitalism should be addressed, as well as the role of historiography and compared political economy. |
|
演讲主题
|
Europe and Contemporary Migrations (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Rada Iveković |
|
演讲摘要
|
Europe is no exception to the contemporary closure of borders to people from the global south and east, but it is a particularly insidious example of what is going on practically world-wide in the 21st century and within the new world-configuration of powers. Migrations as an ancient human way of being, but at this time as an epochal and global issue, now define the 21st century. In a globalized world, migrations too should be apprehended globally and as a trans-national phenomenon. In the public lecture, as well as in my mini course at the International Institute for Cultural Studies (ICCS/IICS) of National Chiao Tung University, I shall raise some philosophical questions regarding the functioning of exception(s), immunisation and blind-spots within a given political context, and some political questions regarding the responsibility of Europe in this state of affairs. Postfascism and the status of tolerance in capitalism should be addressed, as well as the role of historiography and compared political economy. |
|
演讲主题
|
Europe and Contemporary Migrations (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Rada Iveković |
|
演讲摘要
|
Europe is no exception to the contemporary closure of borders to people from the global south and east, but it is a particularly insidious example of what is going on practically world-wide in the 21st century and within the new world-configuration of powers. Migrations as an ancient human way of being, but at this time as an epochal and global issue, now define the 21st century. In a globalized world, migrations too should be apprehended globally and as a trans-national phenomenon. In the public lecture, as well as in my mini course at the International Institute for Cultural Studies (ICCS/IICS) of National Chiao Tung University, I shall raise some philosophical questions regarding the functioning of exception(s), immunisation and blind-spots within a given political context, and some political questions regarding the responsibility of Europe in this state of affairs. Postfascism and the status of tolerance in capitalism should be addressed, as well as the role of historiography and compared political economy. |
|
演讲主题
|
Europe and Contemporary Migrations (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Rada Iveković |
|
演讲摘要
|
Europe is no exception to the contemporary closure of borders to people from the global south and east, but it is a particularly insidious example of what is going on practically world-wide in the 21st century and within the new world-configuration of powers. Migrations as an ancient human way of being, but at this time as an epochal and global issue, now define the 21st century. In a globalized world, migrations too should be apprehended globally and as a trans-national phenomenon. In the public lecture, as well as in my mini course at the International Institute for Cultural Studies (ICCS/IICS) of National Chiao Tung University, I shall raise some philosophical questions regarding the functioning of exception(s), immunisation and blind-spots within a given political context, and some political questions regarding the responsibility of Europe in this state of affairs. Postfascism and the status of tolerance in capitalism should be addressed, as well as the role of historiography and compared political economy. |
|
演讲主题
|
Lecture: The Tree Remember (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月14日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
LAU Kek-huat |
|
演讲摘要
|
Derived from the proverb "What the axe forgets, the tree remembers", presents the current situation in Malaysia whereas the racial policy is still practised in Malaysia and the victims forced to have remained in silence. This film tackles the origin of racism in Malaysia and the taboo of racial riot in 1969. |
|
演讲主题
|
Lecture: The Tree Remember (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月14日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
LAU Kek-huat |
|
演讲摘要
|
Derived from the proverb "What the axe forgets, the tree remembers", presents the current situation in Malaysia whereas the racial policy is still practised in Malaysia and the victims forced to have remained in silence. This film tackles the origin of racism in Malaysia and the taboo of racial riot in 1969. |
|
演讲主题
|
Lecture: The Tree Remember (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月14日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
LAU Kek-huat |
|
演讲摘要
|
Derived from the proverb "What the axe forgets, the tree remembers", presents the current situation in Malaysia whereas the racial policy is still practised in Malaysia and the victims forced to have remained in silence. This film tackles the origin of racism in Malaysia and the taboo of racial riot in 1969. |
|
演讲主题
|
Insurgent Mobilities (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月09日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Maple J. Razsa |
|
演讲摘要
|
In 2015–2016, 1.2 million refugees sought safety in Europe via the Balkan Route. How, in an era of securitized borders, did this unprecedented movement of people from the global south reach the global north? Ethnographic research from two post-Yugoslav nodes along the Route—Preshevë, Serbia and Ljubljana, Slovenia—offers answers that diverge from state-centric accounts, revealing that the relationships between movements, in the sense of both migration and activism, were integral to the dynamics of the Route. |
|
演讲主题
|
Insurgent Mobilities (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月09日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Maple J. Razsa |
|
演讲摘要
|
In 2015–2016, 1.2 million refugees sought safety in Europe via the Balkan Route. How, in an era of securitized borders, did this unprecedented movement of people from the global south reach the global north? Ethnographic research from two post-Yugoslav nodes along the Route—Preshevë, Serbia and Ljubljana, Slovenia—offers answers that diverge from state-centric accounts, revealing that the relationships between movements, in the sense of both migration and activism, were integral to the dynamics of the Route. |
|
演讲主题
|
Insurgent Mobilities (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月09日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Maple J. Razsa |
|
演讲摘要
|
In 2015–2016, 1.2 million refugees sought safety in Europe via the Balkan Route. How, in an era of securitized borders, did this unprecedented movement of people from the global south reach the global north? Ethnographic research from two post-Yugoslav nodes along the Route—Preshevë, Serbia and Ljubljana, Slovenia—offers answers that diverge from state-centric accounts, revealing that the relationships between movements, in the sense of both migration and activism, were integral to the dynamics of the Route. |
|
演讲主题
|
Insurgent Mobilities (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月09日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Maple J. Razsa |
|
演讲摘要
|
In 2015–2016, 1.2 million refugees sought safety in Europe via the Balkan Route. How, in an era of securitized borders, did this unprecedented movement of people from the global south reach the global north? Ethnographic research from two post-Yugoslav nodes along the Route—Preshevë, Serbia and Ljubljana, Slovenia—offers answers that diverge from state-centric accounts, revealing that the relationships between movements, in the sense of both migration and activism, were integral to the dynamics of the Route. |
|
演讲主题
|
Insurgent Mobilities (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月09日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Maple J. Razsa |
|
演讲摘要
|
In 2015–2016, 1.2 million refugees sought safety in Europe via the Balkan Route. How, in an era of securitized borders, did this unprecedented movement of people from the global south reach the global north? Ethnographic research from two post-Yugoslav nodes along the Route—Preshevë, Serbia and Ljubljana, Slovenia—offers answers that diverge from state-centric accounts, revealing that the relationships between movements, in the sense of both migration and activism, were integral to the dynamics of the Route. |
|
演讲主题
|
Insurgent Mobilities (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月09日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Maple J. Razsa |
|
演讲摘要
|
In 2015–2016, 1.2 million refugees sought safety in Europe via the Balkan Route. How, in an era of securitized borders, did this unprecedented movement of people from the global south reach the global north? Ethnographic research from two post-Yugoslav nodes along the Route—Preshevë, Serbia and Ljubljana, Slovenia—offers answers that diverge from state-centric accounts, revealing that the relationships between movements, in the sense of both migration and activism, were integral to the dynamics of the Route. |
|
演讲主题
|
Insurgent Mobilities (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月09日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Maple J. Razsa |
|
演讲摘要
|
In 2015–2016, 1.2 million refugees sought safety in Europe via the Balkan Route. How, in an era of securitized borders, did this unprecedented movement of people from the global south reach the global north? Ethnographic research from two post-Yugoslav nodes along the Route—Preshevë, Serbia and Ljubljana, Slovenia—offers answers that diverge from state-centric accounts, revealing that the relationships between movements, in the sense of both migration and activism, were integral to the dynamics of the Route. |
|
演讲主题
|
Africa Rising? BRICS – Diversifying Dependency (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月02日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Ian Taylor |
|
演讲摘要
|
Africa is said to be rising, turning a definitive page in its history, heralding new and exciting possibilities for the continent. This discourse maintains that with upsurge in economic growth comes improved governance and endogenous dynamics; that the emerging economies, and especially the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India China, South Africa), have been instrumental in diversifying Africa's international relations, perhaps leading to a radical change in the global order, favourable to the developing world. But to what extent is this true, and how deep and how broad has been the impact on society at large? This book takes a critical look at the prevalent Africa Rising discourse, and explores the nature and implications of Africa's "rise" and the role that the BRICS have played in it. The author argues that Africa has still to undergo any structural transformation; that there is strong evidence that deindustrialisation and jobless growth have accompanied the upsurge of interest in the continent; and that far from making a radical turn in its developmental trajectory, Africa is being pushed into the resource corner as commodity exporters, to the North (and now, the BRICS) with little scope for industrial progress or skills advancement. Hope that the BRICS might offer an alternative to the extant neoliberal order are misplaced, for the BRICS have a stake in maintaining the current global unequality. Africa must therefore fashion its own independent path - while the emerging economies will be important, relying on external actors may simply reproduce anew the current state of underdevelopment. |
|
演讲主题
|
Africa Rising? BRICS – Diversifying Dependency (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月02日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Ian Taylor |
|
演讲摘要
|
Africa is said to be rising, turning a definitive page in its history, heralding new and exciting possibilities for the continent. This discourse maintains that with upsurge in economic growth comes improved governance and endogenous dynamics; that the emerging economies, and especially the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India China, South Africa), have been instrumental in diversifying Africa's international relations, perhaps leading to a radical change in the global order, favourable to the developing world. But to what extent is this true, and how deep and how broad has been the impact on society at large? This book takes a critical look at the prevalent Africa Rising discourse, and explores the nature and implications of Africa's "rise" and the role that the BRICS have played in it. The author argues that Africa has still to undergo any structural transformation; that there is strong evidence that deindustrialisation and jobless growth have accompanied the upsurge of interest in the continent; and that far from making a radical turn in its developmental trajectory, Africa is being pushed into the resource corner as commodity exporters, to the North (and now, the BRICS) with little scope for industrial progress or skills advancement. Hope that the BRICS might offer an alternative to the extant neoliberal order are misplaced, for the BRICS have a stake in maintaining the current global unequality. Africa must therefore fashion its own independent path - while the emerging economies will be important, relying on external actors may simply reproduce anew the current state of underdevelopment. |
|
演讲主题
|
Africa Rising? BRICS – Diversifying Dependency (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月02日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Ian Taylor |
|
演讲摘要
|
Africa is said to be rising, turning a definitive page in its history, heralding new and exciting possibilities for the continent. This discourse maintains that with upsurge in economic growth comes improved governance and endogenous dynamics; that the emerging economies, and especially the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India China, South Africa), have been instrumental in diversifying Africa's international relations, perhaps leading to a radical change in the global order, favourable to the developing world. But to what extent is this true, and how deep and how broad has been the impact on society at large? This book takes a critical look at the prevalent Africa Rising discourse, and explores the nature and implications of Africa's "rise" and the role that the BRICS have played in it. The author argues that Africa has still to undergo any structural transformation; that there is strong evidence that deindustrialisation and jobless growth have accompanied the upsurge of interest in the continent; and that far from making a radical turn in its developmental trajectory, Africa is being pushed into the resource corner as commodity exporters, to the North (and now, the BRICS) with little scope for industrial progress or skills advancement. Hope that the BRICS might offer an alternative to the extant neoliberal order are misplaced, for the BRICS have a stake in maintaining the current global unequality. Africa must therefore fashion its own independent path - while the emerging economies will be important, relying on external actors may simply reproduce anew the current state of underdevelopment. |
|
演讲主题
|
Africa Rising? BRICS – Diversifying Dependency (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月02日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Ian Taylor |
|
演讲摘要
|
Africa is said to be rising, turning a definitive page in its history, heralding new and exciting possibilities for the continent. This discourse maintains that with upsurge in economic growth comes improved governance and endogenous dynamics; that the emerging economies, and especially the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India China, South Africa), have been instrumental in diversifying Africa's international relations, perhaps leading to a radical change in the global order, favourable to the developing world. But to what extent is this true, and how deep and how broad has been the impact on society at large? This book takes a critical look at the prevalent Africa Rising discourse, and explores the nature and implications of Africa's "rise" and the role that the BRICS have played in it. The author argues that Africa has still to undergo any structural transformation; that there is strong evidence that deindustrialisation and jobless growth have accompanied the upsurge of interest in the continent; and that far from making a radical turn in its developmental trajectory, Africa is being pushed into the resource corner as commodity exporters, to the North (and now, the BRICS) with little scope for industrial progress or skills advancement. Hope that the BRICS might offer an alternative to the extant neoliberal order are misplaced, for the BRICS have a stake in maintaining the current global unequality. Africa must therefore fashion its own independent path - while the emerging economies will be important, relying on external actors may simply reproduce anew the current state of underdevelopment. |
|
演讲主题
|
Africa Rising? BRICS – Diversifying Dependency (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月02日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Ian Taylor |
|
演讲摘要
|
Africa is said to be rising, turning a definitive page in its history, heralding new and exciting possibilities for the continent. This discourse maintains that with upsurge in economic growth comes improved governance and endogenous dynamics; that the emerging economies, and especially the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India China, South Africa), have been instrumental in diversifying Africa's international relations, perhaps leading to a radical change in the global order, favourable to the developing world. But to what extent is this true, and how deep and how broad has been the impact on society at large? This book takes a critical look at the prevalent Africa Rising discourse, and explores the nature and implications of Africa's "rise" and the role that the BRICS have played in it. The author argues that Africa has still to undergo any structural transformation; that there is strong evidence that deindustrialisation and jobless growth have accompanied the upsurge of interest in the continent; and that far from making a radical turn in its developmental trajectory, Africa is being pushed into the resource corner as commodity exporters, to the North (and now, the BRICS) with little scope for industrial progress or skills advancement. Hope that the BRICS might offer an alternative to the extant neoliberal order are misplaced, for the BRICS have a stake in maintaining the current global unequality. Africa must therefore fashion its own independent path - while the emerging economies will be important, relying on external actors may simply reproduce anew the current state of underdevelopment. |
|
演讲主题
|
The Rise of China and the US-led World Order (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月01日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Li Xing |
|
演讲摘要
|
内容简介: 讲座着重分析和解读中国崛起对现存美国主导的世界秩序所产生的重大影响，并从不同的角度以及多层次的解析，将全球化，现行世界秩序的危机以及中国崛起这些问题建构在一个立体的架构，全面地分析中国崛起过程中与美国为主导的资本主义世界秩序之间的既有融合合作又有矛盾冲突的复杂关系。讲座通过结合一些主流国际关系和国际政治经济理论视角的讨论和反思，指出中国崛起所带来的复杂性，挑战性和不确定性。世界秩序的主导权(hegemony)已经进入到”相互依存主导权” ( interdependent hegemony)的时代。 *中文演讲 (Chinese Lectures) |
|
演讲主题
|
The Rise of China and the US-led World Order (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月01日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Li Xing |
|
演讲摘要
|
内容简介: 讲座着重分析和解读中国崛起对现存美国主导的世界秩序所产生的重大影响，并从不同的角度以及多层次的解析，将全球化，现行世界秩序的危机以及中国崛起这些问题建构在一个立体的架构，全面地分析中国崛起过程中与美国为主导的资本主义世界秩序之间的既有融合合作又有矛盾冲突的复杂关系。讲座通过结合一些主流国际关系和国际政治经济理论视角的讨论和反思，指出中国崛起所带来的复杂性，挑战性和不确定性。世界秩序的主导权(hegemony)已经进入到”相互依存主导权” ( interdependent hegemony)的时代。 *中文演讲 (Chinese Lectures) |
|
演讲主题
|
The Rise of China and the US-led World Order (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月01日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Li Xing |
|
演讲摘要
|
内容简介: 讲座着重分析和解读中国崛起对现存美国主导的世界秩序所产生的重大影响，并从不同的角度以及多层次的解析，将全球化，现行世界秩序的危机以及中国崛起这些问题建构在一个立体的架构，全面地分析中国崛起过程中与美国为主导的资本主义世界秩序之间的既有融合合作又有矛盾冲突的复杂关系。讲座通过结合一些主流国际关系和国际政治经济理论视角的讨论和反思，指出中国崛起所带来的复杂性，挑战性和不确定性。世界秩序的主导权(hegemony)已经进入到”相互依存主导权” ( interdependent hegemony)的时代。 *中文演讲 (Chinese Lectures) |
|
演讲主题
|
The Rise of China and the US-led World Order (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月01日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Li Xing |
|
演讲摘要
|
内容简介: 讲座着重分析和解读中国崛起对现存美国主导的世界秩序所产生的重大影响，并从不同的角度以及多层次的解析，将全球化，现行世界秩序的危机以及中国崛起这些问题建构在一个立体的架构，全面地分析中国崛起过程中与美国为主导的资本主义世界秩序之间的既有融合合作又有矛盾冲突的复杂关系。讲座通过结合一些主流国际关系和国际政治经济理论视角的讨论和反思，指出中国崛起所带来的复杂性，挑战性和不确定性。世界秩序的主导权(hegemony)已经进入到”相互依存主导权” ( interdependent hegemony)的时代。 *中文演讲 (Chinese Lectures) |
|
演讲主题
|
The Rise of China and the US-led World Order (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月01日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Li Xing |
|
演讲摘要
|
内容简介: 讲座着重分析和解读中国崛起对现存美国主导的世界秩序所产生的重大影响，并从不同的角度以及多层次的解析，将全球化，现行世界秩序的危机以及中国崛起这些问题建构在一个立体的架构，全面地分析中国崛起过程中与美国为主导的资本主义世界秩序之间的既有融合合作又有矛盾冲突的复杂关系。讲座通过结合一些主流国际关系和国际政治经济理论视角的讨论和反思，指出中国崛起所带来的复杂性，挑战性和不确定性。世界秩序的主导权(hegemony)已经进入到”相互依存主导权” ( interdependent hegemony)的时代。 *中文演讲 (Chinese Lectures) |
|
演讲主题
|
The Rise of China and the US-led World Order (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年10月01日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Li Xing |
|
演讲摘要
|
内容简介: 讲座着重分析和解读中国崛起对现存美国主导的世界秩序所产生的重大影响，并从不同的角度以及多层次的解析，将全球化，现行世界秩序的危机以及中国崛起这些问题建构在一个立体的架构，全面地分析中国崛起过程中与美国为主导的资本主义世界秩序之间的既有融合合作又有矛盾冲突的复杂关系。讲座通过结合一些主流国际关系和国际政治经济理论视角的讨论和反思，指出中国崛起所带来的复杂性，挑战性和不确定性。世界秩序的主导权(hegemony)已经进入到”相互依存主导权” ( interdependent hegemony)的时代。 *中文演讲 (Chinese Lectures) |
|
演讲主题
|
Queer Radiance: Disability, Sexuality, and Vision (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年09月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演讲摘要
|
In this talk, Professor Villarejo will introduce to students an intersectional approach to disability studies, gender studies, queer theory, and TV studies. |
|
演讲主题
|
Queer Radiance: Disability, Sexuality, and Vision (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年09月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演讲摘要
|
In this talk, Professor Villarejo will introduce to students an intersectional approach to disability studies, gender studies, queer theory, and TV studies. |
|
演讲主题
|
Queer Radiance: Disability, Sexuality, and Vision (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年09月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演讲摘要
|
In this talk, Professor Villarejo will introduce to students an intersectional approach to disability studies, gender studies, queer theory, and TV studies. |
|
演讲主题
|
Queer Radiance: Disability, Sexuality, and Vision (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年09月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演讲摘要
|
In this talk, Professor Villarejo will introduce to students an intersectional approach to disability studies, gender studies, queer theory, and TV studies. |
|
演讲主题
|
Queer Sentiment on Television Venue (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年09月26日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演讲摘要
|
A helpful tradition of queer theory — from Lauren Berlant to others involved in the collective called “political emotions” — has helped us to understand sentiment as a power wielded socially and historically, in which the public is sustained and defined through shared feeling. This talk examines how sentiment is activated in the particular mode of crying in response to television programs, using recent examples from Queer Eye and the reboot of Tales of the City. |
|
演讲主题
|
Queer Sentiment on Television Venue (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年09月26日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演讲摘要
|
A helpful tradition of queer theory — from Lauren Berlant to others involved in the collective called “political emotions” — has helped us to understand sentiment as a power wielded socially and historically, in which the public is sustained and defined through shared feeling. This talk examines how sentiment is activated in the particular mode of crying in response to television programs, using recent examples from Queer Eye and the reboot of Tales of the City. |
|
演讲主题
|
Queer Sentiment on Television Venue (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年09月26日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演讲摘要
|
A helpful tradition of queer theory — from Lauren Berlant to others involved in the collective called “political emotions” — has helped us to understand sentiment as a power wielded socially and historically, in which the public is sustained and defined through shared feeling. This talk examines how sentiment is activated in the particular mode of crying in response to television programs, using recent examples from Queer Eye and the reboot of Tales of the City. |
|
演讲主题
|
Queer Sentiment on Television Venue (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年09月26日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演讲摘要
|
A helpful tradition of queer theory — from Lauren Berlant to others involved in the collective called “political emotions” — has helped us to understand sentiment as a power wielded socially and historically, in which the public is sustained and defined through shared feeling. This talk examines how sentiment is activated in the particular mode of crying in response to television programs, using recent examples from Queer Eye and the reboot of Tales of the City. |
|
演讲主题
|
Queer Sentiment on Television Venue (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年09月26日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演讲摘要
|
A helpful tradition of queer theory — from Lauren Berlant to others involved in the collective called “political emotions” — has helped us to understand sentiment as a power wielded socially and historically, in which the public is sustained and defined through shared feeling. This talk examines how sentiment is activated in the particular mode of crying in response to television programs, using recent examples from Queer Eye and the reboot of Tales of the City. |
|
演讲主题
|
Queer Sentiment on Television Venue (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年09月26日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演讲摘要
|
A helpful tradition of queer theory — from Lauren Berlant to others involved in the collective called “political emotions” — has helped us to understand sentiment as a power wielded socially and historically, in which the public is sustained and defined through shared feeling. This talk examines how sentiment is activated in the particular mode of crying in response to television programs, using recent examples from Queer Eye and the reboot of Tales of the City. |
|
演讲主题
|
Queer Sentiment on Television Venue (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年09月26日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Amy Villarejo |
|
演讲摘要
|
A helpful tradition of queer theory — from Lauren Berlant to others involved in the collective called “political emotions” — has helped us to understand sentiment as a power wielded socially and historically, in which the public is sustained and defined through shared feeling. This talk examines how sentiment is activated in the particular mode of crying in response to television programs, using recent examples from Queer Eye and the reboot of Tales of the City. |
|
演讲主题
|
难民与移工：马来西亚的平行社会 (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月06日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
唐南发(Josh Hong) |
|
演讲摘要
|
自1970年代中开始，马来西亚就成为东南亚难民暂居的主要国家之一，四十几年来收容过来自菲律宾，越南，柬埔寨，印尼，缅甸，泰国以及世界其他地区的难民。 但马来西亚并未签署1951年联合国的难民公约，因此无义务为这些人士提供教育，医疗和就业机会，于是这些责任主要由驻在马来西亚的联合国难民署(United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR)扛下来。直至今日，有高达16万的各国难民和寻求庇护者向UNHCR登记，这个数字尚未包括因菲律宾南部动乱而长期居住在沙巴，难以估算的菲律宾籍人口。 除此之外，马来西亚还拥有人数庞大的移工群体，是东南亚主要的移工接收国之一。根据人力资源部数据，截至2018年底为止，马来西亚有证照(documented)的各国移工达180万，主要来自印尼，孟加拉，尼泊尔，印度和缅甸，而在这个数字之上还有人数可能达到300万的无证照(undocumented)移工。 换句话说，马来西亚人口仅仅3200万，竟然有将近500万的外籍人士 - 绝大多数还是无证照者 - 居住其中，难怪这个议题经常成为媒体和公众的焦点，也是政治人物借题发挥的素材。 无论难民或移工，其实几乎都以一种无形的方式存在，和主流马来西亚社会并行，形成了所谓“平行社会”的现象。尽管这些群体为马来西亚经济作出巨大贡献，基于对国家体制缺乏人权保障的恐惧，加上对主流社会的不信任，他们于教育，就业甚至经贸层面衍生出一套求存的策略。 本次交流旨在透过马来西亚特殊的历史，宗教，族群和文化脉络，分享他们与一般民众时而紧张，时而有趣而正面的互动，并解构马来西亚作为一个“三大族群同心同德”国家的荒谬与谜思。 |
|
演讲主题
|
难民与移工：马来西亚的平行社会 (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月06日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
唐南发(Josh Hong) |
|
演讲摘要
|
自1970年代中开始，马来西亚就成为东南亚难民暂居的主要国家之一，四十几年来收容过来自菲律宾，越南，柬埔寨，印尼，缅甸，泰国以及世界其他地区的难民。 但马来西亚并未签署1951年联合国的难民公约，因此无义务为这些人士提供教育，医疗和就业机会，于是这些责任主要由驻在马来西亚的联合国难民署(United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR)扛下来。直至今日，有高达16万的各国难民和寻求庇护者向UNHCR登记，这个数字尚未包括因菲律宾南部动乱而长期居住在沙巴，难以估算的菲律宾籍人口。 除此之外，马来西亚还拥有人数庞大的移工群体，是东南亚主要的移工接收国之一。根据人力资源部数据，截至2018年底为止，马来西亚有证照(documented)的各国移工达180万，主要来自印尼，孟加拉，尼泊尔，印度和缅甸，而在这个数字之上还有人数可能达到300万的无证照(undocumented)移工。 换句话说，马来西亚人口仅仅3200万，竟然有将近500万的外籍人士 - 绝大多数还是无证照者 - 居住其中，难怪这个议题经常成为媒体和公众的焦点，也是政治人物借题发挥的素材。 无论难民或移工，其实几乎都以一种无形的方式存在，和主流马来西亚社会并行，形成了所谓“平行社会”的现象。尽管这些群体为马来西亚经济作出巨大贡献，基于对国家体制缺乏人权保障的恐惧，加上对主流社会的不信任，他们于教育，就业甚至经贸层面衍生出一套求存的策略。 本次交流旨在透过马来西亚特殊的历史，宗教，族群和文化脉络，分享他们与一般民众时而紧张，时而有趣而正面的互动，并解构马来西亚作为一个“三大族群同心同德”国家的荒谬与谜思。 |
|
演讲主题
|
难民与移工：马来西亚的平行社会 (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月06日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
唐南发(Josh Hong) |
|
演讲摘要
|
自1970年代中开始，马来西亚就成为东南亚难民暂居的主要国家之一，四十几年来收容过来自菲律宾，越南，柬埔寨，印尼，缅甸，泰国以及世界其他地区的难民。 但马来西亚并未签署1951年联合国的难民公约，因此无义务为这些人士提供教育，医疗和就业机会，于是这些责任主要由驻在马来西亚的联合国难民署(United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR)扛下来。直至今日，有高达16万的各国难民和寻求庇护者向UNHCR登记，这个数字尚未包括因菲律宾南部动乱而长期居住在沙巴，难以估算的菲律宾籍人口。 除此之外，马来西亚还拥有人数庞大的移工群体，是东南亚主要的移工接收国之一。根据人力资源部数据，截至2018年底为止，马来西亚有证照(documented)的各国移工达180万，主要来自印尼，孟加拉，尼泊尔，印度和缅甸，而在这个数字之上还有人数可能达到300万的无证照(undocumented)移工。 换句话说，马来西亚人口仅仅3200万，竟然有将近500万的外籍人士 - 绝大多数还是无证照者 - 居住其中，难怪这个议题经常成为媒体和公众的焦点，也是政治人物借题发挥的素材。 无论难民或移工，其实几乎都以一种无形的方式存在，和主流马来西亚社会并行，形成了所谓“平行社会”的现象。尽管这些群体为马来西亚经济作出巨大贡献，基于对国家体制缺乏人权保障的恐惧，加上对主流社会的不信任，他们于教育，就业甚至经贸层面衍生出一套求存的策略。 本次交流旨在透过马来西亚特殊的历史，宗教，族群和文化脉络，分享他们与一般民众时而紧张，时而有趣而正面的互动，并解构马来西亚作为一个“三大族群同心同德”国家的荒谬与谜思。 |
|
演讲主题
|
难民与移工：马来西亚的平行社会 (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月06日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
唐南发(Josh Hong) |
|
演讲摘要
|
自1970年代中开始，马来西亚就成为东南亚难民暂居的主要国家之一，四十几年来收容过来自菲律宾，越南，柬埔寨，印尼，缅甸，泰国以及世界其他地区的难民。 但马来西亚并未签署1951年联合国的难民公约，因此无义务为这些人士提供教育，医疗和就业机会，于是这些责任主要由驻在马来西亚的联合国难民署(United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR)扛下来。直至今日，有高达16万的各国难民和寻求庇护者向UNHCR登记，这个数字尚未包括因菲律宾南部动乱而长期居住在沙巴，难以估算的菲律宾籍人口。 除此之外，马来西亚还拥有人数庞大的移工群体，是东南亚主要的移工接收国之一。根据人力资源部数据，截至2018年底为止，马来西亚有证照(documented)的各国移工达180万，主要来自印尼，孟加拉，尼泊尔，印度和缅甸，而在这个数字之上还有人数可能达到300万的无证照(undocumented)移工。 换句话说，马来西亚人口仅仅3200万，竟然有将近500万的外籍人士 - 绝大多数还是无证照者 - 居住其中，难怪这个议题经常成为媒体和公众的焦点，也是政治人物借题发挥的素材。 无论难民或移工，其实几乎都以一种无形的方式存在，和主流马来西亚社会并行，形成了所谓“平行社会”的现象。尽管这些群体为马来西亚经济作出巨大贡献，基于对国家体制缺乏人权保障的恐惧，加上对主流社会的不信任，他们于教育，就业甚至经贸层面衍生出一套求存的策略。 本次交流旨在透过马来西亚特殊的历史，宗教，族群和文化脉络，分享他们与一般民众时而紧张，时而有趣而正面的互动，并解构马来西亚作为一个“三大族群同心同德”国家的荒谬与谜思。 |
|
演讲主题
|
难民与移工：马来西亚的平行社会 (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月06日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
唐南发(Josh Hong) |
|
演讲摘要
|
自1970年代中开始，马来西亚就成为东南亚难民暂居的主要国家之一，四十几年来收容过来自菲律宾，越南，柬埔寨，印尼，缅甸，泰国以及世界其他地区的难民。 但马来西亚并未签署1951年联合国的难民公约，因此无义务为这些人士提供教育，医疗和就业机会，于是这些责任主要由驻在马来西亚的联合国难民署(United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR)扛下来。直至今日，有高达16万的各国难民和寻求庇护者向UNHCR登记，这个数字尚未包括因菲律宾南部动乱而长期居住在沙巴，难以估算的菲律宾籍人口。 除此之外，马来西亚还拥有人数庞大的移工群体，是东南亚主要的移工接收国之一。根据人力资源部数据，截至2018年底为止，马来西亚有证照(documented)的各国移工达180万，主要来自印尼，孟加拉，尼泊尔，印度和缅甸，而在这个数字之上还有人数可能达到300万的无证照(undocumented)移工。 换句话说，马来西亚人口仅仅3200万，竟然有将近500万的外籍人士 - 绝大多数还是无证照者 - 居住其中，难怪这个议题经常成为媒体和公众的焦点，也是政治人物借题发挥的素材。 无论难民或移工，其实几乎都以一种无形的方式存在，和主流马来西亚社会并行，形成了所谓“平行社会”的现象。尽管这些群体为马来西亚经济作出巨大贡献，基于对国家体制缺乏人权保障的恐惧，加上对主流社会的不信任，他们于教育，就业甚至经贸层面衍生出一套求存的策略。 本次交流旨在透过马来西亚特殊的历史，宗教，族群和文化脉络，分享他们与一般民众时而紧张，时而有趣而正面的互动，并解构马来西亚作为一个“三大族群同心同德”国家的荒谬与谜思。 |
|
演讲主题
|
难民与移工：马来西亚的平行社会 (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月06日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
唐南发(Josh Hong) |
|
演讲摘要
|
自1970年代中开始，马来西亚就成为东南亚难民暂居的主要国家之一，四十几年来收容过来自菲律宾，越南，柬埔寨，印尼，缅甸，泰国以及世界其他地区的难民。 但马来西亚并未签署1951年联合国的难民公约，因此无义务为这些人士提供教育，医疗和就业机会，于是这些责任主要由驻在马来西亚的联合国难民署(United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR)扛下来。直至今日，有高达16万的各国难民和寻求庇护者向UNHCR登记，这个数字尚未包括因菲律宾南部动乱而长期居住在沙巴，难以估算的菲律宾籍人口。 除此之外，马来西亚还拥有人数庞大的移工群体，是东南亚主要的移工接收国之一。根据人力资源部数据，截至2018年底为止，马来西亚有证照(documented)的各国移工达180万，主要来自印尼，孟加拉，尼泊尔，印度和缅甸，而在这个数字之上还有人数可能达到300万的无证照(undocumented)移工。 换句话说，马来西亚人口仅仅3200万，竟然有将近500万的外籍人士 - 绝大多数还是无证照者 - 居住其中，难怪这个议题经常成为媒体和公众的焦点，也是政治人物借题发挥的素材。 无论难民或移工，其实几乎都以一种无形的方式存在，和主流马来西亚社会并行，形成了所谓“平行社会”的现象。尽管这些群体为马来西亚经济作出巨大贡献，基于对国家体制缺乏人权保障的恐惧，加上对主流社会的不信任，他们于教育，就业甚至经贸层面衍生出一套求存的策略。 本次交流旨在透过马来西亚特殊的历史，宗教，族群和文化脉络，分享他们与一般民众时而紧张，时而有趣而正面的互动，并解构马来西亚作为一个“三大族群同心同德”国家的荒谬与谜思。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Another way of making philosophy (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月11日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou |
|
演讲摘要
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou是希腊爱琴(海)大学教育哲学与应用哲学系教授，爱琴海大学应用哲学研究中心主任。Elena Theodoropoulou主要研究领域为应用哲学及其多元型态、教育伦理及其实务型态，哲学的当代逻辑性。她在希腊引进儿童教育哲学之对话与反思、从哲学探讨职场伦理等。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Another way of making philosophy (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月11日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou |
|
演讲摘要
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou是希腊爱琴(海)大学教育哲学与应用哲学系教授，爱琴海大学应用哲学研究中心主任。Elena Theodoropoulou主要研究领域为应用哲学及其多元型态、教育伦理及其实务型态，哲学的当代逻辑性。她在希腊引进儿童教育哲学之对话与反思、从哲学探讨职场伦理等。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Another way of making philosophy (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月11日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou |
|
演讲摘要
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou是希腊爱琴(海)大学教育哲学与应用哲学系教授，爱琴海大学应用哲学研究中心主任。Elena Theodoropoulou主要研究领域为应用哲学及其多元型态、教育伦理及其实务型态，哲学的当代逻辑性。她在希腊引进儿童教育哲学之对话与反思、从哲学探讨职场伦理等。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Another way of making philosophy (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月11日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou |
|
演讲摘要
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou是希腊爱琴(海)大学教育哲学与应用哲学系教授，爱琴海大学应用哲学研究中心主任。Elena Theodoropoulou主要研究领域为应用哲学及其多元型态、教育伦理及其实务型态，哲学的当代逻辑性。她在希腊引进儿童教育哲学之对话与反思、从哲学探讨职场伦理等。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Another way of making philosophy (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月11日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou |
|
演讲摘要
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou是希腊爱琴(海)大学教育哲学与应用哲学系教授，爱琴海大学应用哲学研究中心主任。Elena Theodoropoulou主要研究领域为应用哲学及其多元型态、教育伦理及其实务型态，哲学的当代逻辑性。她在希腊引进儿童教育哲学之对话与反思、从哲学探讨职场伦理等。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Another way of making philosophy (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月11日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou |
|
演讲摘要
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou是希腊爱琴(海)大学教育哲学与应用哲学系教授，爱琴海大学应用哲学研究中心主任。Elena Theodoropoulou主要研究领域为应用哲学及其多元型态、教育伦理及其实务型态，哲学的当代逻辑性。她在希腊引进儿童教育哲学之对话与反思、从哲学探讨职场伦理等。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Another way of making philosophy (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月11日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou |
|
演讲摘要
|
Eleni Theodoropoulou是希腊爱琴(海)大学教育哲学与应用哲学系教授，爱琴海大学应用哲学研究中心主任。Elena Theodoropoulou主要研究领域为应用哲学及其多元型态、教育伦理及其实务型态，哲学的当代逻辑性。她在希腊引进儿童教育哲学之对话与反思、从哲学探讨职场伦理等。 |
|
演讲主题
|
The "Great Replacement”? (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月05日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison |
|
演讲摘要
|
「大取代」这个词是法国极右派作家赫努卡谬(Renaud Camus)所提出的，他控诉穆斯林是族群「大取代」的起源，从而带给法国社会与其「身分」的重大威胁。不久前，新西兰发生仇视伊斯兰攻击，这起屠杀事件很明显呼应了赫努卡谬的用词，可见「大取代」这个命名和影响力已经国际化了。 |
|
演讲主题
|
The "Great Replacement”? (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月05日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison |
|
演讲摘要
|
「大取代」这个词是法国极右派作家赫努卡谬(Renaud Camus)所提出的，他控诉穆斯林是族群「大取代」的起源，从而带给法国社会与其「身分」的重大威胁。不久前，新西兰发生仇视伊斯兰攻击，这起屠杀事件很明显呼应了赫努卡谬的用词，可见「大取代」这个命名和影响力已经国际化了。 |
|
演讲主题
|
The "Great Replacement”? (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月05日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison |
|
演讲摘要
|
「大取代」这个词是法国极右派作家赫努卡谬(Renaud Camus)所提出的，他控诉穆斯林是族群「大取代」的起源，从而带给法国社会与其「身分」的重大威胁。不久前，新西兰发生仇视伊斯兰攻击，这起屠杀事件很明显呼应了赫努卡谬的用词，可见「大取代」这个命名和影响力已经国际化了。 |
|
演讲主题
|
The "Great Replacement”? (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月05日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison |
|
演讲摘要
|
「大取代」这个词是法国极右派作家赫努卡谬(Renaud Camus)所提出的，他控诉穆斯林是族群「大取代」的起源，从而带给法国社会与其「身分」的重大威胁。不久前，新西兰发生仇视伊斯兰攻击，这起屠杀事件很明显呼应了赫努卡谬的用词，可见「大取代」这个命名和影响力已经国际化了。 |
|
演讲主题
|
The "Great Replacement”? (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月05日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison |
|
演讲摘要
|
「大取代」这个词是法国极右派作家赫努卡谬(Renaud Camus)所提出的，他控诉穆斯林是族群「大取代」的起源，从而带给法国社会与其「身分」的重大威胁。不久前，新西兰发生仇视伊斯兰攻击，这起屠杀事件很明显呼应了赫努卡谬的用词，可见「大取代」这个命名和影响力已经国际化了。 |
|
演讲主题
|
The "Great Replacement”? (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月05日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison |
|
演讲摘要
|
「大取代」这个词是法国极右派作家赫努卡谬(Renaud Camus)所提出的，他控诉穆斯林是族群「大取代」的起源，从而带给法国社会与其「身分」的重大威胁。不久前，新西兰发生仇视伊斯兰攻击，这起屠杀事件很明显呼应了赫努卡谬的用词，可见「大取代」这个命名和影响力已经国际化了。 |
|
演讲主题
|
The "Great Replacement”? (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年06月05日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison |
|
演讲摘要
|
「大取代」这个词是法国极右派作家赫努卡谬(Renaud Camus)所提出的，他控诉穆斯林是族群「大取代」的起源，从而带给法国社会与其「身分」的重大威胁。不久前，新西兰发生仇视伊斯兰攻击，这起屠杀事件很明显呼应了赫努卡谬的用词，可见「大取代」这个命名和影响力已经国际化了。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Insolvency (1): The avant-garde after the end of modernism and the end of the working class movement in the West |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演讲摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演讲主题
|
Insolvency (2): The avant-garde after the end of modernism and the end of the working class movement in the West |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演讲摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演讲主题
|
Insolvency (3): The avant-garde after the end of modernism and the end of the working class movement in the West |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演讲摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演讲主题
|
Insolvency (4): The avant-garde after the end of modernism and the end of the working class movement in the West |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演讲摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演讲主题
|
Insolvency (5): The avant-garde after the end of modernism and the end of the working class movement in the West |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演讲摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演讲主题
|
Trump's Counter-Revolution (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演讲摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演讲主题
|
Trump's Counter-Revolution (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演讲摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演讲主题
|
Trump's Counter-Revolution (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演讲摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演讲主题
|
Trump's Counter-Revolution (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演讲摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演讲主题
|
Trump's Counter-Revolution (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演讲摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演讲主题
|
Trump's Counter-Revolution (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演讲摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演讲主题
|
Trump's Counter-Revolution (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen |
|
演讲摘要
|
In Trump's Counter-Revolution, Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen looks behind the craziness of Donald Trump to decipher the formation of a new kind of fascism, late-capitalist fascism, that is intent on preventing any kind of real social change. Trump projects an image of America as threatened, but capable of re-creating itself as a united, white and patriarchal community: "Make America great again.” After forty years of extreme, uneven development in the US, Trump's late-capitalist fascism fuses popular culture and ultra-nationalism in an attempt to renew the old alliance between the white working class and the capitalist class, preventing the coming into being of an anti-capitalist alliance between Occupy and Black Lives Matter. |
|
演讲主题
|
关于非洲暴力的感觉思考 Feeling-Thinking On Violence In Africa (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月22日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
朱元鸿 |
|
演讲摘要
|
本讲将视相关性以日常的、人类学的、历史的、社会-政治的、或神话-哲学的角度，感觉思考曾经发生的乌干达内战与卢旺达族群屠杀，以及目前继续发生于刚果民主共和国东部省份、尼日尔利亚、南苏丹、以及南非的暴力冲突。 |
|
演讲主题
|
关于非洲暴力的感觉思考 Feeling-Thinking On Violence In Africa (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月22日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
朱元鸿 |
|
演讲摘要
|
本讲将视相关性以日常的、人类学的、历史的、社会-政治的、或神话-哲学的角度，感觉思考曾经发生的乌干达内战与卢旺达族群屠杀，以及目前继续发生于刚果民主共和国东部省份、尼日尔利亚、南苏丹、以及南非的暴力冲突。 |
|
演讲主题
|
关于非洲暴力的感觉思考 Feeling-Thinking On Violence In Africa (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月22日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
朱元鸿 |
|
演讲摘要
|
本讲将视相关性以日常的、人类学的、历史的、社会-政治的、或神话-哲学的角度，感觉思考曾经发生的乌干达内战与卢旺达族群屠杀，以及目前继续发生于刚果民主共和国东部省份、尼日尔利亚、南苏丹、以及南非的暴力冲突。 |
|
演讲主题
|
关于非洲暴力的感觉思考 Feeling-Thinking On Violence In Africa (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月22日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
朱元鸿 |
|
演讲摘要
|
本讲将视相关性以日常的、人类学的、历史的、社会-政治的、或神话-哲学的角度，感觉思考曾经发生的乌干达内战与卢旺达族群屠杀，以及目前继续发生于刚果民主共和国东部省份、尼日尔利亚、南苏丹、以及南非的暴力冲突。 |
|
演讲主题
|
关于非洲暴力的感觉思考 Feeling-Thinking On Violence In Africa (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月22日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
朱元鸿 |
|
演讲摘要
|
本讲将视相关性以日常的、人类学的、历史的、社会-政治的、或神话-哲学的角度，感觉思考曾经发生的乌干达内战与卢旺达族群屠杀，以及目前继续发生于刚果民主共和国东部省份、尼日尔利亚、南苏丹、以及南非的暴力冲突。 |
|
演讲主题
|
关于非洲暴力的感觉思考 Feeling-Thinking On Violence In Africa (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月22日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
朱元鸿 |
|
演讲摘要
|
本讲将视相关性以日常的、人类学的、历史的、社会-政治的、或神话-哲学的角度，感觉思考曾经发生的乌干达内战与卢旺达族群屠杀，以及目前继续发生于刚果民主共和国东部省份、尼日尔利亚、南苏丹、以及南非的暴力冲突。 |
|
演讲主题
|
关于非洲暴力的感觉思考 Feeling-Thinking On Violence In Africa (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月22日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
朱元鸿 |
|
演讲摘要
|
本讲将视相关性以日常的、人类学的、历史的、社会-政治的、或神话-哲学的角度，感觉思考曾经发生的乌干达内战与卢旺达族群屠杀，以及目前继续发生于刚果民主共和国东部省份、尼日尔利亚、南苏丹、以及南非的暴力冲突。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Ritual Mediations and the Postmemory of the Cheju Massacre in Korea (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月10日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Seong Nae Kim |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk inquires into questions of violence, memory, silence and memorialization with respect to a formative historical event, the Cheju Massacre or April Third (4.3 Sasam) Incident on Cheju Island in 1948 which was regarded as one of the first outbreaks of violent ideological conflict in the early Cold War. It explores the way in which the imagery of violent deaths in the family and villages during the massacres is ritually mediated through spirit possession and the re-burial rites of dead bodies that have been exhumed from mass graves sixty years after the event. In the ritual communication and public commemorations, the “ghostly” status of the massacre victims is granted new status as “the ancestor” of family and also acquired newly as “the victim” of state violence. This “ritualized hospitality” toward these new collective dead operates in variant forms of re-placing the dead victims across multiple scales of social relations involving families, local villages, the island, and finally, the South Korean state. The massacre victims shift their position from one of “nonplace” to “placed.” It was precisely due to their social alienation and historically liminal status that such nonaligned spirits served as the ideal object of ritual practices in ways that attest to a new paradigm of memory politics in which all dead are equally and permanently venerated. The talk envisages the new paradigm of memory work in the post–Cold War era. |
|
演讲主题
|
Ritual Mediations and the Postmemory of the Cheju Massacre in Korea (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月10日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Seong Nae Kim |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk inquires into questions of violence, memory, silence and memorialization with respect to a formative historical event, the Cheju Massacre or April Third (4.3 Sasam) Incident on Cheju Island in 1948 which was regarded as one of the first outbreaks of violent ideological conflict in the early Cold War. It explores the way in which the imagery of violent deaths in the family and villages during the massacres is ritually mediated through spirit possession and the re-burial rites of dead bodies that have been exhumed from mass graves sixty years after the event. In the ritual communication and public commemorations, the “ghostly” status of the massacre victims is granted new status as “the ancestor” of family and also acquired newly as “the victim” of state violence. This “ritualized hospitality” toward these new collective dead operates in variant forms of re-placing the dead victims across multiple scales of social relations involving families, local villages, the island, and finally, the South Korean state. The massacre victims shift their position from one of “nonplace” to “placed.” It was precisely due to their social alienation and historically liminal status that such nonaligned spirits served as the ideal object of ritual practices in ways that attest to a new paradigm of memory politics in which all dead are equally and permanently venerated. The talk envisages the new paradigm of memory work in the post–Cold War era. |
|
演讲主题
|
Ritual Mediations and the Postmemory of the Cheju Massacre in Korea (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月10日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Seong Nae Kim |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk inquires into questions of violence, memory, silence and memorialization with respect to a formative historical event, the Cheju Massacre or April Third (4.3 Sasam) Incident on Cheju Island in 1948 which was regarded as one of the first outbreaks of violent ideological conflict in the early Cold War. It explores the way in which the imagery of violent deaths in the family and villages during the massacres is ritually mediated through spirit possession and the re-burial rites of dead bodies that have been exhumed from mass graves sixty years after the event. In the ritual communication and public commemorations, the “ghostly” status of the massacre victims is granted new status as “the ancestor” of family and also acquired newly as “the victim” of state violence. This “ritualized hospitality” toward these new collective dead operates in variant forms of re-placing the dead victims across multiple scales of social relations involving families, local villages, the island, and finally, the South Korean state. The massacre victims shift their position from one of “nonplace” to “placed.” It was precisely due to their social alienation and historically liminal status that such nonaligned spirits served as the ideal object of ritual practices in ways that attest to a new paradigm of memory politics in which all dead are equally and permanently venerated. The talk envisages the new paradigm of memory work in the post–Cold War era. |
|
演讲主题
|
Ritual Mediations and the Postmemory of the Cheju Massacre in Korea (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月10日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Seong Nae Kim |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk inquires into questions of violence, memory, silence and memorialization with respect to a formative historical event, the Cheju Massacre or April Third (4.3 Sasam) Incident on Cheju Island in 1948 which was regarded as one of the first outbreaks of violent ideological conflict in the early Cold War. It explores the way in which the imagery of violent deaths in the family and villages during the massacres is ritually mediated through spirit possession and the re-burial rites of dead bodies that have been exhumed from mass graves sixty years after the event. In the ritual communication and public commemorations, the “ghostly” status of the massacre victims is granted new status as “the ancestor” of family and also acquired newly as “the victim” of state violence. This “ritualized hospitality” toward these new collective dead operates in variant forms of re-placing the dead victims across multiple scales of social relations involving families, local villages, the island, and finally, the South Korean state. The massacre victims shift their position from one of “nonplace” to “placed.” It was precisely due to their social alienation and historically liminal status that such nonaligned spirits served as the ideal object of ritual practices in ways that attest to a new paradigm of memory politics in which all dead are equally and permanently venerated. The talk envisages the new paradigm of memory work in the post–Cold War era. |
|
演讲主题
|
Ritual Mediations and the Postmemory of the Cheju Massacre in Korea (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月10日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Seong Nae Kim |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk inquires into questions of violence, memory, silence and memorialization with respect to a formative historical event, the Cheju Massacre or April Third (4.3 Sasam) Incident on Cheju Island in 1948 which was regarded as one of the first outbreaks of violent ideological conflict in the early Cold War. It explores the way in which the imagery of violent deaths in the family and villages during the massacres is ritually mediated through spirit possession and the re-burial rites of dead bodies that have been exhumed from mass graves sixty years after the event. In the ritual communication and public commemorations, the “ghostly” status of the massacre victims is granted new status as “the ancestor” of family and also acquired newly as “the victim” of state violence. This “ritualized hospitality” toward these new collective dead operates in variant forms of re-placing the dead victims across multiple scales of social relations involving families, local villages, the island, and finally, the South Korean state. The massacre victims shift their position from one of “nonplace” to “placed.” It was precisely due to their social alienation and historically liminal status that such nonaligned spirits served as the ideal object of ritual practices in ways that attest to a new paradigm of memory politics in which all dead are equally and permanently venerated. The talk envisages the new paradigm of memory work in the post–Cold War era. |
|
演讲主题
|
Ritual Mediations and the Postmemory of the Cheju Massacre in Korea (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月10日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Seong Nae Kim |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk inquires into questions of violence, memory, silence and memorialization with respect to a formative historical event, the Cheju Massacre or April Third (4.3 Sasam) Incident on Cheju Island in 1948 which was regarded as one of the first outbreaks of violent ideological conflict in the early Cold War. It explores the way in which the imagery of violent deaths in the family and villages during the massacres is ritually mediated through spirit possession and the re-burial rites of dead bodies that have been exhumed from mass graves sixty years after the event. In the ritual communication and public commemorations, the “ghostly” status of the massacre victims is granted new status as “the ancestor” of family and also acquired newly as “the victim” of state violence. This “ritualized hospitality” toward these new collective dead operates in variant forms of re-placing the dead victims across multiple scales of social relations involving families, local villages, the island, and finally, the South Korean state. The massacre victims shift their position from one of “nonplace” to “placed.” It was precisely due to their social alienation and historically liminal status that such nonaligned spirits served as the ideal object of ritual practices in ways that attest to a new paradigm of memory politics in which all dead are equally and permanently venerated. The talk envisages the new paradigm of memory work in the post–Cold War era. |
|
演讲主题
|
Ritual Mediations and the Postmemory of the Cheju Massacre in Korea (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年05月10日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Seong Nae Kim |
|
演讲摘要
|
This talk inquires into questions of violence, memory, silence and memorialization with respect to a formative historical event, the Cheju Massacre or April Third (4.3 Sasam) Incident on Cheju Island in 1948 which was regarded as one of the first outbreaks of violent ideological conflict in the early Cold War. It explores the way in which the imagery of violent deaths in the family and villages during the massacres is ritually mediated through spirit possession and the re-burial rites of dead bodies that have been exhumed from mass graves sixty years after the event. In the ritual communication and public commemorations, the “ghostly” status of the massacre victims is granted new status as “the ancestor” of family and also acquired newly as “the victim” of state violence. This “ritualized hospitality” toward these new collective dead operates in variant forms of re-placing the dead victims across multiple scales of social relations involving families, local villages, the island, and finally, the South Korean state. The massacre victims shift their position from one of “nonplace” to “placed.” It was precisely due to their social alienation and historically liminal status that such nonaligned spirits served as the ideal object of ritual practices in ways that attest to a new paradigm of memory politics in which all dead are equally and permanently venerated. The talk envisages the new paradigm of memory work in the post–Cold War era. |
|
演讲主题
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演讲摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演讲主题
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演讲摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演讲主题
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演讲摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演讲主题
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演讲摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演讲主题
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演讲摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演讲主题
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演讲摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演讲主题
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演讲摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演讲主题
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (8) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演讲摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演讲主题
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (9) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演讲摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演讲主题
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (10) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演讲摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演讲主题
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (11) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演讲摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演讲主题
|
Decolonising Social Science: Meaning and Prospects (12) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月24日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Syed Farid Alatas |
|
演讲摘要
|
Decades of the critique of Eurocentrism and Orientalism in the social sciences have refined our understanding of the various theoretical and epistemological problems that beset the process of knowledge production. Less, however, has been achieved by way of the actual creation of alternative or decolonial options in knowledge production, owing to the persistence of intellectual imperialism and academic dependency. This presentation discusses what knowledge in the decolonial mode may look like and what factors continue to obstruct or retard the growth of alternative discourses in the social sciences. |
|
演讲主题
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演讲摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演讲主题
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演讲摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演讲主题
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演讲摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演讲主题
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演讲摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演讲主题
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演讲摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演讲主题
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演讲摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演讲主题
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演讲摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演讲主题
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (8) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演讲摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演讲主题
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (9) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演讲摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演讲主题
|
Can a Research Question Violate a Human Right? (10) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月19日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Cindy Patton |
|
演讲摘要
|
Pierre Bourdieu's later work on the state revised Weber's notion of bureaucracy to consider the dual 'habitus' of the bureaucratic field, that is, the bureaucrat has a double moral duty, first to their specific discipline and second, to act on behalf of the whole. The two talks position state-sponsored scientists as bureaucrats who on one hand, produce science on behalf of the whole, but also, experience 'moral fatigue' when their research products fail to achieve desired social goals. |
|
演讲主题
|
西谷修的战争哲学：战争的蜕变 (1)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲摘要
|
讲者于本次演讲讲述现代国家的演变，探讨战争型态的变化，由主权国家、民族国家、安全国家等等，讨论出战争发动权、征兵制、全面战争与总动员、核相互保证毁灭、反恐战争与非常状态等等。最后他讲述当前反恐战争中，恐怖分子的判定与分类，如何造成这些人的非人化、失去人权等等作为人类文明敌人的现象。 |
|
演讲主题
|
西谷修的战争哲学：战争的蜕变 (2)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲摘要
|
讲者于本次演讲讲述现代国家的演变，探讨战争型态的变化，由主权国家、民族国家、安全国家等等，讨论出战争发动权、征兵制、全面战争与总动员、核相互保证毁灭、反恐战争与非常状态等等。最后他讲述当前反恐战争中，恐怖分子的判定与分类，如何造成这些人的非人化、失去人权等等作为人类文明敌人的现象。 |
|
演讲主题
|
西谷修的战争哲学：战争的蜕变 (3)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲摘要
|
讲者于本次演讲讲述现代国家的演变，探讨战争型态的变化，由主权国家、民族国家、安全国家等等，讨论出战争发动权、征兵制、全面战争与总动员、核相互保证毁灭、反恐战争与非常状态等等。最后他讲述当前反恐战争中，恐怖分子的判定与分类，如何造成这些人的非人化、失去人权等等作为人类文明敌人的现象。 |
|
演讲主题
|
西谷修的战争哲学：战争的蜕变 (4)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲摘要
|
讲者于本次演讲讲述现代国家的演变，探讨战争型态的变化，由主权国家、民族国家、安全国家等等，讨论出战争发动权、征兵制、全面战争与总动员、核相互保证毁灭、反恐战争与非常状态等等。最后他讲述当前反恐战争中，恐怖分子的判定与分类，如何造成这些人的非人化、失去人权等等作为人类文明敌人的现象。 |
|
演讲主题
|
西谷修的战争哲学：战争的蜕变 (5)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲摘要
|
讲者于本次演讲讲述现代国家的演变，探讨战争型态的变化，由主权国家、民族国家、安全国家等等，讨论出战争发动权、征兵制、全面战争与总动员、核相互保证毁灭、反恐战争与非常状态等等。最后他讲述当前反恐战争中，恐怖分子的判定与分类，如何造成这些人的非人化、失去人权等等作为人类文明敌人的现象。 |
|
演讲主题
|
西谷修的战争哲学：战争的蜕变 (6)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲摘要
|
讲者于本次演讲讲述现代国家的演变，探讨战争型态的变化，由主权国家、民族国家、安全国家等等，讨论出战争发动权、征兵制、全面战争与总动员、核相互保证毁灭、反恐战争与非常状态等等。最后他讲述当前反恐战争中，恐怖分子的判定与分类，如何造成这些人的非人化、失去人权等等作为人类文明敌人的现象。 |
|
演讲主题
|
西谷修的战争哲学：战争的蜕变 (7)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲摘要
|
讲者于本次演讲讲述现代国家的演变，探讨战争型态的变化，由主权国家、民族国家、安全国家等等，讨论出战争发动权、征兵制、全面战争与总动员、核相互保证毁灭、反恐战争与非常状态等等。最后他讲述当前反恐战争中，恐怖分子的判定与分类，如何造成这些人的非人化、失去人权等等作为人类文明敌人的现象。 |
|
演讲主题
|
西谷修的战争哲学：战争的蜕变 (8)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲摘要
|
讲者于本次演讲讲述现代国家的演变，探讨战争型态的变化，由主权国家、民族国家、安全国家等等，讨论出战争发动权、征兵制、全面战争与总动员、核相互保证毁灭、反恐战争与非常状态等等。最后他讲述当前反恐战争中，恐怖分子的判定与分类，如何造成这些人的非人化、失去人权等等作为人类文明敌人的现象。 |
|
演讲主题
|
西谷修的战争哲学：战争的蜕变 (9)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲摘要
|
讲者于本次演讲讲述现代国家的演变，探讨战争型态的变化，由主权国家、民族国家、安全国家等等，讨论出战争发动权、征兵制、全面战争与总动员、核相互保证毁灭、反恐战争与非常状态等等。最后他讲述当前反恐战争中，恐怖分子的判定与分类，如何造成这些人的非人化、失去人权等等作为人类文明敌人的现象。 |
|
演讲主题
|
西谷修的战争哲学：战争的蜕变 (10)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲摘要
|
讲者于本次演讲讲述现代国家的演变，探讨战争型态的变化，由主权国家、民族国家、安全国家等等，讨论出战争发动权、征兵制、全面战争与总动员、核相互保证毁灭、反恐战争与非常状态等等。最后他讲述当前反恐战争中，恐怖分子的判定与分类，如何造成这些人的非人化、失去人权等等作为人类文明敌人的现象。 |
|
演讲主题
|
西谷修的战争哲学：战争的蜕变 (11)-Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年04月17日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
Osamu NISHITANI |
|
演讲摘要
|
讲者于本次演讲讲述现代国家的演变，探讨战争型态的变化，由主权国家、民族国家、安全国家等等，讨论出战争发动权、征兵制、全面战争与总动员、核相互保证毁灭、反恐战争与非常状态等等。最后他讲述当前反恐战争中，恐怖分子的判定与分类，如何造成这些人的非人化、失去人权等等作为人类文明敌人的现象。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演讲摘要
|
泰国成为难民、流离失所者，和移工的迁居地，已有三十年的时间。几十万的难民居住在沿着边界所设立的九处难民营，另外有大约一万人居住在市区。估计约有400万移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰国。根据在四个泰缅边境的省分所做的调查，民众反应出对于安全议题的高度关注，多数泰国受访者也认为这些难民与移工对公众安全带来危害，并可能带有传染病。受访者也认为，难民与移工会抢了泰国本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近难民营的农民，相较于居住在距离较远的都市区的受访者，普遍有对于移工与难民有正向观感。这些结果将有助于讨论以甚么观点能够消除误解，并且帮助难民与移工融入泰国社会。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演讲摘要
|
泰国成为难民、流离失所者，和移工的迁居地，已有三十年的时间。几十万的难民居住在沿着边界所设立的九处难民营，另外有大约一万人居住在市区。估计约有400万移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰国。根据在四个泰缅边境的省分所做的调查，民众反应出对于安全议题的高度关注，多数泰国受访者也认为这些难民与移工对公众安全带来危害，并可能带有传染病。受访者也认为，难民与移工会抢了泰国本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近难民营的农民，相较于居住在距离较远的都市区的受访者，普遍有对于移工与难民有正向观感。这些结果将有助于讨论以甚么观点能够消除误解，并且帮助难民与移工融入泰国社会。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演讲摘要
|
泰国成为难民、流离失所者，和移工的迁居地，已有三十年的时间。几十万的难民居住在沿着边界所设立的九处难民营，另外有大约一万人居住在市区。估计约有400万移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰国。根据在四个泰缅边境的省分所做的调查，民众反应出对于安全议题的高度关注，多数泰国受访者也认为这些难民与移工对公众安全带来危害，并可能带有传染病。受访者也认为，难民与移工会抢了泰国本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近难民营的农民，相较于居住在距离较远的都市区的受访者，普遍有对于移工与难民有正向观感。这些结果将有助于讨论以甚么观点能够消除误解，并且帮助难民与移工融入泰国社会。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演讲摘要
|
泰国成为难民、流离失所者，和移工的迁居地，已有三十年的时间。几十万的难民居住在沿着边界所设立的九处难民营，另外有大约一万人居住在市区。估计约有400万移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰国。根据在四个泰缅边境的省分所做的调查，民众反应出对于安全议题的高度关注，多数泰国受访者也认为这些难民与移工对公众安全带来危害，并可能带有传染病。受访者也认为，难民与移工会抢了泰国本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近难民营的农民，相较于居住在距离较远的都市区的受访者，普遍有对于移工与难民有正向观感。这些结果将有助于讨论以甚么观点能够消除误解，并且帮助难民与移工融入泰国社会。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演讲摘要
|
泰国成为难民、流离失所者，和移工的迁居地，已有三十年的时间。几十万的难民居住在沿着边界所设立的九处难民营，另外有大约一万人居住在市区。估计约有400万移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰国。根据在四个泰缅边境的省分所做的调查，民众反应出对于安全议题的高度关注，多数泰国受访者也认为这些难民与移工对公众安全带来危害，并可能带有传染病。受访者也认为，难民与移工会抢了泰国本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近难民营的农民，相较于居住在距离较远的都市区的受访者，普遍有对于移工与难民有正向观感。这些结果将有助于讨论以甚么观点能够消除误解，并且帮助难民与移工融入泰国社会。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演讲摘要
|
泰国成为难民、流离失所者，和移工的迁居地，已有三十年的时间。几十万的难民居住在沿着边界所设立的九处难民营，另外有大约一万人居住在市区。估计约有400万移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰国。根据在四个泰缅边境的省分所做的调查，民众反应出对于安全议题的高度关注，多数泰国受访者也认为这些难民与移工对公众安全带来危害，并可能带有传染病。受访者也认为，难民与移工会抢了泰国本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近难民营的农民，相较于居住在距离较远的都市区的受访者，普遍有对于移工与难民有正向观感。这些结果将有助于讨论以甚么观点能够消除误解，并且帮助难民与移工融入泰国社会。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演讲摘要
|
泰国成为难民、流离失所者，和移工的迁居地，已有三十年的时间。几十万的难民居住在沿着边界所设立的九处难民营，另外有大约一万人居住在市区。估计约有400万移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰国。根据在四个泰缅边境的省分所做的调查，民众反应出对于安全议题的高度关注，多数泰国受访者也认为这些难民与移工对公众安全带来危害，并可能带有传染病。受访者也认为，难民与移工会抢了泰国本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近难民营的农民，相较于居住在距离较远的都市区的受访者，普遍有对于移工与难民有正向观感。这些结果将有助于讨论以甚么观点能够消除误解，并且帮助难民与移工融入泰国社会。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (8) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演讲摘要
|
泰国成为难民、流离失所者，和移工的迁居地，已有三十年的时间。几十万的难民居住在沿着边界所设立的九处难民营，另外有大约一万人居住在市区。估计约有400万移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰国。根据在四个泰缅边境的省分所做的调查，民众反应出对于安全议题的高度关注，多数泰国受访者也认为这些难民与移工对公众安全带来危害，并可能带有传染病。受访者也认为，难民与移工会抢了泰国本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近难民营的农民，相较于居住在距离较远的都市区的受访者，普遍有对于移工与难民有正向观感。这些结果将有助于讨论以甚么观点能够消除误解，并且帮助难民与移工融入泰国社会。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (9) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演讲摘要
|
泰国成为难民、流离失所者，和移工的迁居地，已有三十年的时间。几十万的难民居住在沿着边界所设立的九处难民营，另外有大约一万人居住在市区。估计约有400万移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰国。根据在四个泰缅边境的省分所做的调查，民众反应出对于安全议题的高度关注，多数泰国受访者也认为这些难民与移工对公众安全带来危害，并可能带有传染病。受访者也认为，难民与移工会抢了泰国本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近难民营的农民，相较于居住在距离较远的都市区的受访者，普遍有对于移工与难民有正向观感。这些结果将有助于讨论以甚么观点能够消除误解，并且帮助难民与移工融入泰国社会。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Perceptions of Thais towards refugees and migrants from Myanmar (10) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月29日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan |
|
演讲摘要
|
泰国成为难民、流离失所者，和移工的迁居地，已有三十年的时间。几十万的难民居住在沿着边界所设立的九处难民营，另外有大约一万人居住在市区。估计约有400万移工，以合法和非法身分居住在泰国。根据在四个泰缅边境的省分所做的调查，民众反应出对于安全议题的高度关注，多数泰国受访者也认为这些难民与移工对公众安全带来危害，并可能带有传染病。受访者也认为，难民与移工会抢了泰国本地工人的工作。然而，那些居住在靠近难民营的农民，相较于居住在距离较远的都市区的受访者，普遍有对于移工与难民有正向观感。这些结果将有助于讨论以甚么观点能够消除误解，并且帮助难民与移工融入泰国社会。 |
|
演讲主题
|
Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk (1) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan、赵中麒 |
|
演讲摘要
|
议题：《穷人。榴梿。麻药。偷渡客》电影放映与映后座谈 Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk 时间：2019/03/27 16:00-18:30 地点：交通大学人社二馆106教室 |
|
演讲主题
|
Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan、赵中麒 |
|
演讲摘要
|
议题：《穷人。榴梿。麻药。偷渡客》电影放映与映后座谈 Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk 时间：2019/03/27 16:00-18:30 地点：交通大学人社二馆106教室 |
|
演讲主题
|
Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan、赵中麒 |
|
演讲摘要
|
议题：《穷人。榴梿。麻药。偷渡客》电影放映与映后座谈 Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk 时间：2019/03/27 16:00-18:30 地点：交通大学人社二馆106教室 |
|
演讲主题
|
Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan、赵中麒 |
|
演讲摘要
|
议题：《穷人。榴梿。麻药。偷渡客》电影放映与映后座谈 Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk 时间：2019/03/27 16:00-18:30 地点：交通大学人社二馆106教室 |
|
演讲主题
|
Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月27日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
MaleeSunpuwan、赵中麒 |
|
演讲摘要
|
议题：《穷人。榴梿。麻药。偷渡客》电影放映与映后座谈 Film Screening and After-Screening Discussion：Poor Folk 时间：2019/03/27 16:00-18:30 地点：交通大学人社二馆106教室 |
|
|
演讲主题
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (2) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
刘晓原 |
|
演讲摘要
|
1949年以后，中华人民共和国政府面临着历史遗留的厘清国界的问题，涉及周边多国。其中，中蒙边界极具特殊性。首先，这是中国在20世纪最新近的边界问题，开始于于1945年。其次，这项问题在1949年以后包含了极其复杂的边界理念，集国际、党际、民族／族群际内涵于一体。最后，60年代中苏分裂以后，中蒙边界地区成为冷战时期最具战略意义的边疆地区之一，不但苏联陈重兵于蒙古，内蒙古地区也在「文革」期间成为国内唯一遭到肢解的省区。1962年中蒙边界条约的签订，背景是双方的党际关系逐渐恶化、国家关系趋于「正常」，领土观念大幅调整。中、蒙完成划界，不仅取决于中、蒙、苏三国政府在冷战时期的外交决策，更是近现代中国领土属性转型和东亚国际关系现代化发展的必然结果。 |
|
演讲主题
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (3) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
刘晓原 |
|
演讲摘要
|
1949年以后，中华人民共和国政府面临着历史遗留的厘清国界的问题，涉及周边多国。其中，中蒙边界极具特殊性。首先，这是中国在20世纪最新近的边界问题，开始于于1945年。其次，这项问题在1949年以后包含了极其复杂的边界理念，集国际、党际、民族／族群际内涵于一体。最后，60年代中苏分裂以后，中蒙边界地区成为冷战时期最具战略意义的边疆地区之一，不但苏联陈重兵于蒙古，内蒙古地区也在「文革」期间成为国内唯一遭到肢解的省区。1962年中蒙边界条约的签订，背景是双方的党际关系逐渐恶化、国家关系趋于「正常」，领土观念大幅调整。中、蒙完成划界，不仅取决于中、蒙、苏三国政府在冷战时期的外交决策，更是近现代中国领土属性转型和东亚国际关系现代化发展的必然结果。 |
|
演讲主题
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (4) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
刘晓原 |
|
演讲摘要
|
1949年以后，中华人民共和国政府面临着历史遗留的厘清国界的问题，涉及周边多国。其中，中蒙边界极具特殊性。首先，这是中国在20世纪最新近的边界问题，开始于于1945年。其次，这项问题在1949年以后包含了极其复杂的边界理念，集国际、党际、民族／族群际内涵于一体。最后，60年代中苏分裂以后，中蒙边界地区成为冷战时期最具战略意义的边疆地区之一，不但苏联陈重兵于蒙古，内蒙古地区也在「文革」期间成为国内唯一遭到肢解的省区。1962年中蒙边界条约的签订，背景是双方的党际关系逐渐恶化、国家关系趋于「正常」，领土观念大幅调整。中、蒙完成划界，不仅取决于中、蒙、苏三国政府在冷战时期的外交决策，更是近现代中国领土属性转型和东亚国际关系现代化发展的必然结果。 |
|
演讲主题
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (5) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
刘晓原 |
|
演讲摘要
|
1949年以后，中华人民共和国政府面临着历史遗留的厘清国界的问题，涉及周边多国。其中，中蒙边界极具特殊性。首先，这是中国在20世纪最新近的边界问题，开始于于1945年。其次，这项问题在1949年以后包含了极其复杂的边界理念，集国际、党际、民族／族群际内涵于一体。最后，60年代中苏分裂以后，中蒙边界地区成为冷战时期最具战略意义的边疆地区之一，不但苏联陈重兵于蒙古，内蒙古地区也在「文革」期间成为国内唯一遭到肢解的省区。1962年中蒙边界条约的签订，背景是双方的党际关系逐渐恶化、国家关系趋于「正常」，领土观念大幅调整。中、蒙完成划界，不仅取决于中、蒙、苏三国政府在冷战时期的外交决策，更是近现代中国领土属性转型和东亚国际关系现代化发展的必然结果。 |
|
演讲主题
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (6) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
刘晓原 |
|
演讲摘要
|
1949年以后，中华人民共和国政府面临着历史遗留的厘清国界的问题，涉及周边多国。其中，中蒙边界极具特殊性。首先，这是中国在20世纪最新近的边界问题，开始于于1945年。其次，这项问题在1949年以后包含了极其复杂的边界理念，集国际、党际、民族／族群际内涵于一体。最后，60年代中苏分裂以后，中蒙边界地区成为冷战时期最具战略意义的边疆地区之一，不但苏联陈重兵于蒙古，内蒙古地区也在「文革」期间成为国内唯一遭到肢解的省区。1962年中蒙边界条约的签订，背景是双方的党际关系逐渐恶化、国家关系趋于「正常」，领土观念大幅调整。中、蒙完成划界，不仅取决于中、蒙、苏三国政府在冷战时期的外交决策，更是近现代中国领土属性转型和东亚国际关系现代化发展的必然结果。 |
|
演讲主题
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (7) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
刘晓原 |
|
演讲摘要
|
1949年以后，中华人民共和国政府面临着历史遗留的厘清国界的问题，涉及周边多国。其中，中蒙边界极具特殊性。首先，这是中国在20世纪最新近的边界问题，开始于于1945年。其次，这项问题在1949年以后包含了极其复杂的边界理念，集国际、党际、民族／族群际内涵于一体。最后，60年代中苏分裂以后，中蒙边界地区成为冷战时期最具战略意义的边疆地区之一，不但苏联陈重兵于蒙古，内蒙古地区也在「文革」期间成为国内唯一遭到肢解的省区。1962年中蒙边界条约的签订，背景是双方的党际关系逐渐恶化、国家关系趋于「正常」，领土观念大幅调整。中、蒙完成划界，不仅取决于中、蒙、苏三国政府在冷战时期的外交决策，更是近现代中国领土属性转型和东亚国际关系现代化发展的必然结果。 |
|
演讲主题
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (8) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
刘晓原 |
|
演讲摘要
|
1949年以后，中华人民共和国政府面临着历史遗留的厘清国界的问题，涉及周边多国。其中，中蒙边界极具特殊性。首先，这是中国在20世纪最新近的边界问题，开始于于1945年。其次，这项问题在1949年以后包含了极其复杂的边界理念，集国际、党际、民族／族群际内涵于一体。最后，60年代中苏分裂以后，中蒙边界地区成为冷战时期最具战略意义的边疆地区之一，不但苏联陈重兵于蒙古，内蒙古地区也在「文革」期间成为国内唯一遭到肢解的省区。1962年中蒙边界条约的签订，背景是双方的党际关系逐渐恶化、国家关系趋于「正常」，领土观念大幅调整。中、蒙完成划界，不仅取决于中、蒙、苏三国政府在冷战时期的外交决策，更是近现代中国领土属性转型和东亚国际关系现代化发展的必然结果。 |
|
演讲主题
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (9) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
刘晓原 |
|
演讲摘要
|
1949年以后，中华人民共和国政府面临着历史遗留的厘清国界的问题，涉及周边多国。其中，中蒙边界极具特殊性。首先，这是中国在20世纪最新近的边界问题，开始于于1945年。其次，这项问题在1949年以后包含了极其复杂的边界理念，集国际、党际、民族／族群际内涵于一体。最后，60年代中苏分裂以后，中蒙边界地区成为冷战时期最具战略意义的边疆地区之一，不但苏联陈重兵于蒙古，内蒙古地区也在「文革」期间成为国内唯一遭到肢解的省区。1962年中蒙边界条约的签订，背景是双方的党际关系逐渐恶化、国家关系趋于「正常」，领土观念大幅调整。中、蒙完成划界，不仅取决于中、蒙、苏三国政府在冷战时期的外交决策，更是近现代中国领土属性转型和东亚国际关系现代化发展的必然结果。 |
|
演讲主题
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (10) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
刘晓原 |
|
演讲摘要
|
1949年以后，中华人民共和国政府面临着历史遗留的厘清国界的问题，涉及周边多国。其中，中蒙边界极具特殊性。首先，这是中国在20世纪最新近的边界问题，开始于于1945年。其次，这项问题在1949年以后包含了极其复杂的边界理念，集国际、党际、民族／族群际内涵于一体。最后，60年代中苏分裂以后，中蒙边界地区成为冷战时期最具战略意义的边疆地区之一，不但苏联陈重兵于蒙古，内蒙古地区也在「文革」期间成为国内唯一遭到肢解的省区。1962年中蒙边界条约的签订，背景是双方的党际关系逐渐恶化、国家关系趋于「正常」，领土观念大幅调整。中、蒙完成划界，不仅取决于中、蒙、苏三国政府在冷战时期的外交决策，更是近现代中国领土属性转型和东亚国际关系现代化发展的必然结果。 |
|
演讲主题
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (11) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
刘晓原 |
|
演讲摘要
|
1949年以后，中华人民共和国政府面临着历史遗留的厘清国界的问题，涉及周边多国。其中，中蒙边界极具特殊性。首先，这是中国在20世纪最新近的边界问题，开始于于1945年。其次，这项问题在1949年以后包含了极其复杂的边界理念，集国际、党际、民族／族群际内涵于一体。最后，60年代中苏分裂以后，中蒙边界地区成为冷战时期最具战略意义的边疆地区之一，不但苏联陈重兵于蒙古，内蒙古地区也在「文革」期间成为国内唯一遭到肢解的省区。1962年中蒙边界条约的签订，背景是双方的党际关系逐渐恶化、国家关系趋于「正常」，领土观念大幅调整。中、蒙完成划界，不仅取决于中、蒙、苏三国政府在冷战时期的外交决策，更是近现代中国领土属性转型和东亚国际关系现代化发展的必然结果。 |
|
演讲主题
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (12) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
刘晓原 |
|
演讲摘要
|
1949年以后，中华人民共和国政府面临着历史遗留的厘清国界的问题，涉及周边多国。其中，中蒙边界极具特殊性。首先，这是中国在20世纪最新近的边界问题，开始于于1945年。其次，这项问题在1949年以后包含了极其复杂的边界理念，集国际、党际、民族／族群际内涵于一体。最后，60年代中苏分裂以后，中蒙边界地区成为冷战时期最具战略意义的边疆地区之一，不但苏联陈重兵于蒙古，内蒙古地区也在「文革」期间成为国内唯一遭到肢解的省区。1962年中蒙边界条约的签订，背景是双方的党际关系逐渐恶化、国家关系趋于「正常」，领土观念大幅调整。中、蒙完成划界，不仅取决于中、蒙、苏三国政府在冷战时期的外交决策，更是近现代中国领土属性转型和东亚国际关系现代化发展的必然结果。 |
|
演讲主题
|
2019/03/13 Entanglement of Nation, Class, and State (13) |
|
演讲日期
|
2019年03月13日 |
|
演讲讲者
|
刘晓原 |
|
演讲摘要
|
1949年以后，中华人民共和国政府面临着历史遗留的厘清国界的问题，涉及周边多国。其中，中蒙边界极具特殊性。首先，这是中国在20世纪最新近的边界问题，开始于于1945年。其次，这项问题在1949年以后包含了极其复杂的边界理念，集国际、党际、民族／族群际内涵于一体。最后，60年代中苏分裂以后，中蒙边界地区成为冷战时期最具战略意义的边疆地区之一，不但苏联陈重兵于蒙古，内蒙古地区也在「文革」期间成为国内唯一遭到肢解的省区。1962年中蒙边界条约的签订，背景是双方的党际关系逐渐恶化、国家关系趋于「正常」，领土观念大幅调整。中、蒙完成划界，不仅取决于中、蒙、苏三国政府在冷战时期的外交决策，更是近现代中国领土属性转型和东亚国际关系现代化发展的必然结果。 |
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|